Should I become a Classical Physicist?

In summary, the conversation revolves around a person's interest in classical physics, particularly electrodynamics, thermodynamics, and relativity. They are also interested in quantum theory and astrophysics but have a stronger passion for classical physics. The conversation also touches on the importance of undergraduate studies and the difficulty of the math involved in studying physics. Some individuals share their experiences with starting a physics degree and offer advice on how to approach it. They mention the importance of starting with a strong foundation in math and possibly taking intro courses at smaller campuses or community colleges. The conversation also highlights the challenges of studying physics at a larger university and the need for determination and passion to succeed.
  • #1
master cat
2
0
I will start undergrad next year (majoring in Physics). I am very interested in classical physics especially electrodynamics, thermodynamics, and Relativity. I want to explore them and possible come up with new ideas. I also have an interest in Quantum theory and Astrophysics; however, I am more interested in electrodynamics thermodynamics, and Relativity. I know they are classical but I am very interested in them. Should I focus on them or focus on the new theories. Would I be a classical physicist?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
one of the importances of undergraduate study is to get a taste of many aspects of physics. you need not worry now about a focus. instead, maybe it will benefit you most to just enjoy the classes that you need and let that experience guide you to the next level. good luck, as it will be an exciting time for you!
 
  • #3
Thank you for the advise. I am starting late (I am 29). I was suppose to be a physics major went I first went to college, but I chickened out and got a BA in Japanese studies. I want to a least try. I don't want to go through life wondering if I could do it. Now I am studying math to prepare for school next year. I understand the math, but I am still a little worried.
 
  • #4
I recently started a Physics Degree and dropped out because the maths was too hard for me, even in my mid 20's. It was simply a matter of time, the information comes so thick and fast that you barley have time to think about what it means and how valid it is or formulate any real understanding. I found it was just constant jumping through hoops, so i quit.

I underestimated how dificult the maths would be to be honest, i should have spent more time working up to it. Perhaps an intermediate maths course would have been wiser.

So my advice is to make sure your maths is at the level, or youll find it hard to get going.

I also started it because i didnt want to go through life wondering if i could, now i know, i couldn't :P
 
  • #5
3trQN said:
I recently started a Physics Degree and dropped out because the maths was too hard for me, even in my mid 20's. It was simply a matter of time, the information comes so thick and fast that you barley have time to think about what it means and how valid it is or formulate any real understanding. I found it was just constant jumping through hoops, so i quit.

I underestimated how dificult the maths would be to be honest, i should have spent more time working up to it. Perhaps an intermediate maths course would have been wiser.

So my advice is to make sure your maths is at the level, or youll find it hard to get going.

I also started it because i didnt want to go through life wondering if i could, now i know, i couldn't :P

same with me. i took a beginners physics at uni level and even without calculus it proved to be too much for me. i guess i'd stick with chemistry and biology next sem

i suck at physics :redface:
 
  • #6
Second year is the worst...they try and "weed out the weak" so as to make sure the most competent students make it to grad school...lol

and you should learn how to program it helps.
 
  • #7
"It was simply a matter of time, the information comes so thick and fast that you barley have time to think about what it means and how valid it is or formulate any real understanding. I found it was just constant jumping through hoops, so i quit."

this is often the problem, but it's really got to be: get that extra cup of coffee and remember you love the stuff, and really spend a lot of time with it.

i think after a bit sitting the classical world you'd want to branch out - i mean, that's how all the rest happened anyway. science is progressive
 
  • #8
If you can, take the intro to physics course at a community college, or a branch campus,they go a lot slower and its a ton easier so you don't get slapped in the face with it all and give up.

To weigh how much different the physics is at Penn STate Main campus compared to one of penn state's branch campuses was the following:

Class average of Physics 212: E&M was around 50%, i had a 40% after the first midterm, and the class at a 50%.

I then got into an accident so had to go to my community college for a year and drop all my classes I had taken.

The same course, the class average was an 80% and I had a 99% when the semester was over. So smaller is somtimes better. The professor glady went over things a second time to make sure we all understood what was going on. He really taught the subject great. But at penn state main campus, we didn't even foucs on Physics, we were doing trippple integrals on exams, so everyone was getting lost in the math and yet very little physics was being focused on in the lectures.

WHen you in a lecture hall with 300+ and the professor could careless about you, he isn't going to slow down even if the class average is that low. The point of the course is to weed out the non-engineers.
 

Related to Should I become a Classical Physicist?

1. What is a classical physicist?

A classical physicist is a scientist who studies the foundational principles and laws of physics as described by classical mechanics. This includes concepts such as motion, energy, and forces.

2. What kind of education is required to become a classical physicist?

Becoming a classical physicist typically requires a minimum of a bachelor's degree in physics or a related field. Many professionals in this field also have a graduate degree or doctorate in physics.

3. What skills are important for a career in classical physics?

To excel as a classical physicist, strong analytical and mathematical skills are crucial. Attention to detail, problem-solving abilities, and a curious mindset are also important for conducting experiments and analyzing data.

4. What are the job prospects for classical physicists?

The job prospects for classical physicists are generally good, with opportunities in research, academia, and industry. However, competition for positions can be high, so it's important to gain experience and develop a strong skill set.

5. What is the difference between a classical physicist and a theoretical physicist?

While both classical physicists and theoretical physicists study the same fundamental principles of physics, the main difference is in their approach. Classical physicists focus on understanding and explaining physical phenomena through experiments and observations, while theoretical physicists use mathematical models and simulations to make predictions about the behavior of physical systems.

Similar threads

  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
11
Views
526
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
797
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
2
Views
903
Replies
6
Views
856
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
9
Views
884
Back
Top