Showing there are no eigenvectors of the annhilation operator

In summary: This is true of any "lowering" operator. A "lowering operator" is an operator that is 0 on the lowest state, and that maps other states to lower ones. It is a "step down." In summary, There are no eigenvectors of a^{\dagger} assuming the ground state |0> is the lowest energy state of the system.
  • #1
Hakkinen
42
0

Homework Statement


Show there are no eigenvectors of [itex] a^{\dagger}[/itex] assuming the ground state |0> is the lowest energy state of the system.


Homework Equations


Coherent states of the SHO satisfy:
a|z> = z|z>


The Attempt at a Solution


Based on the hint that was given (assume there is such an eigenvector like the coherent state above and expand the state in the basis |n>) I tried this, but it seems too simple.

[itex]a^{\dagger}|0> = k|0> [/itex] (is this expansion in the |n> basis? or |0> basis?)

then conjugate transpose both sides

[itex] a<0|=\bar{k}<0|[/itex]

the lhs vanishes as a is acting on the ground state ket

Is this correct? Any help is greatly appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hello Hakkinen!

You are not taking the conjugate transpose correctly - the left hand side should read [itex]\langle 0 \lvert a[/itex]. That is, it should look like a row vector multiplying a matrix. The operator [itex]a[/itex] "acts to the left" as a creation operator, not as an annihilation operator.
 
  • #3
Oxvillian said:
Hello Hakkinen!

You are not taking the conjugate transpose correctly - the left hand side should read [itex]\langle 0 \lvert a[/itex]. That is, it should look like a row vector multiplying a matrix. The operator [itex]a[/itex] "acts to the left" as a creation operator, not as an annihilation operator.

Thanks for the reply! sorry for the simple mistakes

So is this not the correct approach to show this? If it is, should I start with [itex] a|0> = k|0>[/itex] and then conjugate, leaving the annihilation operator acting on the ground state bra?

so [itex]0 = <0|\bar{k}[/itex]

but this doesn't necessarily show there are no eigenvectors of the ann. operator does it?
 
  • #4
Well [itex]a\lvert 0 \rangle = 0[/itex], since [itex]\lvert 0 \rangle[/itex] is the ground state. We need a new name for the hypothetical eigenstate of [itex]a^{\dagger}[/itex], let's just call it [itex]\lvert \psi \rangle[/itex]. Then

[itex]a^{\dagger}\lvert \psi \rangle = \lambda \lvert \psi \rangle,[/itex]

where [itex]\lambda[/itex] is some number (the eigenvalue). Try expanding [itex]\lvert \psi \rangle[/itex] in terms of the [itex]\lvert n \rangle[/itex] and see what you get.
 
  • #5
Note that people usually call [itex]a[/itex] the annihilation operator, and [itex]a^\dagger[/itex] the creation operator. The reason it is worth to avoid confusion here, is that the annihilation operator [itex]a[/itex] (which satisfies [itex]a|0\rangle=0[/itex], where [itex]|0[/itex] is the ground state) actually has an eigenstate, while the creation operator does not.
 

Related to Showing there are no eigenvectors of the annhilation operator

1. What is an annihilation operator?

The annihilation operator is a mathematical operator used in quantum mechanics to describe the process of removing particles from a system. It is represented by the symbol â and is the Hermitian conjugate of the creation operator.

2. How is the annihilation operator related to eigenvectors?

The annihilation operator does not have any eigenvectors. This means that when we apply the annihilation operator to any state, the resulting state will not be an eigenvector of the operator. This is because the annihilation operator changes the number of particles in a system, making it impossible for any state to remain an eigenvector.

3. Can we prove that there are no eigenvectors of the annihilation operator?

Yes, we can prove this by showing that the annihilation operator does not have any eigenvalues. Since eigenvectors are defined as the vectors that satisfy the eigenvalue equation, if there are no eigenvalues, there can be no eigenvectors.

4. Why is it important to show that there are no eigenvectors of the annihilation operator?

It is important because the annihilation operator is a fundamental concept in quantum mechanics, and understanding its properties can help us make predictions about physical systems. Showing that it has no eigenvectors helps us understand the limitations of the operator and its relationship with other operators.

5. Are there any other operators that do not have eigenvectors?

Yes, there are other operators that do not have eigenvectors. For example, the momentum operator in quantum mechanics also does not have any eigenvectors. This is because it is a non-Hermitian operator, meaning its Hermitian conjugate is not equal to itself, and it does not have a complete set of eigenfunctions.

Similar threads

  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top