Solving a Satellite Orbit Problem: Help Appreciated!

In summary, the conversation discusses the problem of finding the launch velocity for a satellite so that it does not orbit further than six times the Earth's radius. The approach involves using conservation laws, such as conservation of energy and conservation of angular momentum. Further discussion includes the direction of the velocity at the farthest point of the orbit and the use of smiley faces in the conversation.
  • #1
AwesomeTrains
116
3
Warning read on your own risk: This is my first post here. I'm new to english, sorry for my bad grammar.

Homework Statement


A satellite is launched one time Earth radius straight above the northpole (two times radius from center), with an angle of 60° to vertical.
Find the launch velocity [itex]v_{0}[/itex] so that the satellite won't orbit further away than six times Earth radius from the center of the earth.

Homework Equations


FG=G[itex]\frac{Mm}{r^{2}}[/itex]
FC=m[itex]\frac{v^{2}}{r}[/itex]
FNet=[itex]m[/itex][itex]\cdot[/itex][itex]a[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried solving it by finding the satellite's trajectory.

Initial velocity in x and y direction:
[itex]v_{x}=cos 60°[/itex][itex]\cdot[/itex][itex]v_{0}[/itex]
[itex]v_{y}=sin 60°[/itex][itex]\cdot[/itex][itex]v_{0}[/itex]

Velocity from gravitational force in x and y direction:
(Θ the angle the satellite makes with the vertical y-axis through the northpole, when it's in orbit)
[itex]v_{Gx}[/itex]=[itex]\frac{F_{G} \cdot cos Θ \cdot t}{m}[/itex]
[itex]v_{Gy}[/itex]=[itex]\frac{F_{G} \cdot sin Θ \cdot t}{m}[/itex]

Total velocity:
(Vector addition)
[itex]v_{Tot}[/itex]=[itex] (v_{x} - v_{Gx}) + (v_{y} - v_{Gy})[/itex]

I don't know if this approach makes sense/ is correct. If it is, how should I continue?
Feel free to ask if something is unclear. Any help or tips are much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The position of the satellite and therefore the gravitational force is not constant, that approach does not work.

You will need some conservation laws or (but that is more complicated) solutions to the Kepler problem.
 
  • #3
What about this solution:
The kinetik energy from the launch must be equal to the potential energy at 6R for the satellite to get no further away than 6R?
[itex]U=[/itex][itex]\frac{-GMm}{R_{2}-R_{1}}[/itex] and [itex]E_{kin}=\frac{mv_{0}^{2}}{2}[/itex]
The path is not important since it's a conservative field. Energy is conserved.
Therefore
[itex] \frac{-GMm}{5R}[/itex][itex]=[/itex][itex]\frac{mv_{0}^{2}}{2}[/itex]
Then I just solve for [itex]v_{0}[/itex]

Is this true?
 
  • #4
That is better, but still not it. If the potential energy at 6R equals the total energy at 1R, that means the satellite has no kinetic energy, which means it has no velocity. This is possible if the satellite is launched strictly vertically, but it is not in this problem.

You need another conservation law here.
 
  • #5
The torque is zero because r and F vectors are parallel in a central-force field, therefore the angular momentum is conserved.
Then we have [itex]\textbf{r}_{0}[/itex][itex]\times[/itex][itex]\textbf{p}_{0}[/itex][itex]=[/itex][itex]\textbf{r}_{1}[/itex][itex]\times[/itex][itex]\textbf{p}_{1}[/itex]
I'm not sure if the next steps are correct.
Total energy:
[itex]E_{kin0}+E_{pot0}=E_{kin1}+E_{pot1}[/itex]
[itex]\frac{mv^{2}_{0}}{2}+\frac{-GMm}{R}=\frac{mv_{1}^{2}}{2}+\frac{-GMm}{6R}[/itex]

This is where I think I made a mistake:
[itex]v_{0}mr_{0} sin θ = v_{1}mr_{1} sin Θ [/itex]

In orbit velocity and radius vector are perpendicular
[itex]v_{0}m\:1R\:sin (90°+60°) = v_{1}m\:6R\:sin 90° [/itex]
 
  • #6
AwesomeTrains said:
The torque is zero because r and F vectors are parallel in a central-force field, therefore the angular momentum is conserved.
Then we have [itex]\textbf{r}_{0}[/itex][itex]\times[/itex][itex]\textbf{p}_{0}[/itex][itex]=[/itex][itex]\textbf{r}_{1}[/itex][itex]\times[/itex][itex]\textbf{p}_{1}[/itex]
I'm not sure if the next steps are correct.
Total energy:
[itex]E_{kin0}+E_{pot0}=E_{kin1}+E_{pot1}[/itex]
[itex]\frac{mv^{2}_{0}}{2}+\frac{-GMm}{R}=\frac{mv_{1}^{2}}{2}+\frac{-GMm}{6R}[/itex]

This is where I think I made a mistake:
[itex]v_{0}mr_{0} sin θ = v_{1}mr_{1} sin Θ [/itex]

All correct so far.

In orbit velocity and radius vector are perpendicular

It is not clear what you mean by that. Is it everywhere in the orbit? Then it is definitely not true, because at the time of launch the angle between the velocity and the radius vector was 60 degrees.

But what about the the farthest point of the orbit? What is the direction of velocity there?
 
  • #7
voko said:
But what about the the farthest point of the orbit? What is the direction of velocity there?
I meant at 6R the velocity is perpendicular to the radius vector therefore sin is 1.
Then I can solve my equations for initial velocity and velocity at 6R, and I'm done right? :)
(By the way are smileys allowed?)
 
  • #8
AwesomeTrains said:
I meant at 6R the velocity is perpendicular to the radius vector therefore sin is 1.
Then I can solve my equations for initial velocity and velocity at 6R, and I'm done right? :)

Your reasoning is correct.

I do not understand, however, how you obtained ## \sin (90 + 60) ## for the initial position.

(By the way are smileys allowed?)

Yes. You can use the simple text form like you did, or you can insert graphical smiles. Check out the smiley face icon next too the font controls in the reply box.
 
  • #9
Okay. Well I thought the angle between the position vector and the initial velocity vector would be 90°+60° because if you put the origo at the center of the earth, and the velocity vector is 60° compared to horizontal.
Made a drawing: http://imageshack.com/a/img838/8807/qyf5.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
But the problem said "with an angle of 60° to vertical", not horizontal.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #11
Oh, oops. Yea it does. Well thanks for the help :biggrin:! Really kind of you
 
  • #12
Please don't include images of that size directly, it does not fit to the page layout. I converted the img-tags to a link.

The position vector points from (0,0) to the satellite, there is no 90° to add.
 
  • #13
Yes, I understand, will solve the equations now and will put in large images as a link in the future.
Thanks for the help :smile:
 

Related to Solving a Satellite Orbit Problem: Help Appreciated!

1. What is a satellite orbit problem?

A satellite orbit problem refers to the challenge of determining the trajectory and position of a satellite in space. This is important in order to properly control and monitor the satellite's movements and ensure it stays in the desired orbit.

2. How is a satellite's orbit calculated?

A satellite's orbit is calculated using mathematical equations and models that take into account the gravitational forces of the Earth, as well as other factors such as the satellite's mass, velocity, and altitude. These calculations are typically done using sophisticated computer software.

3. What are some common difficulties in solving a satellite orbit problem?

Some common difficulties in solving a satellite orbit problem include inaccuracies in the data used to calculate the orbit, external factors such as atmospheric drag that can affect the satellite's trajectory, and the complexity of the equations and models used.

4. How can I help solve a satellite orbit problem?

There are several ways you can help solve a satellite orbit problem. You can assist in collecting and analyzing data, developing new mathematical models, or using software to simulate and predict satellite orbits. Additionally, collaboration with other experts in the field can lead to new insights and solutions.

5. What are the potential applications of solving a satellite orbit problem?

The accurate determination of satellite orbits has a wide range of applications, including satellite communications, weather forecasting, navigation systems, and remote sensing. It is also crucial for the safe and efficient operation of space missions and for monitoring and protecting Earth's environment.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
303
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
917
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
847
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
580
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
36
Views
2K
Back
Top