Solving WIMP & Dark Matter Equation

In summary, the conversation is about arriving at a final expression of 10^-37 cm^2 using given values and equations. The speaker mentions trying to normalize the equation using values of spins and x parameter, as well as considering the (G)^1/2 (from m_planck)= 10^19 GeV and converting critical density to 1.054 h^2 10^-5 GeV/cm^3. They then discuss using Latex instead of a PDF and showing that the equation for dark matter can be rewritten to match the final expression.
  • #1
Thiwanka Jayasiri
17
0
qTdd0s7SCP7equ0yiNuhdREgRGMQcxLRhR26ky1jmEbq2mtM4GQp_wUCxbs6cM-Bq27iavKYOKmijptBYkuk=w1366-h654.jpg


I'm trying to figure out how to arrive at the final expression, as given in the lecture notes. I tried to work this out by myself but getting different figure and units. I've considered the followings,

normalize the equation from its values e.g. spins and x parameter, as g~100, x~10(m/t~10) also I considered the (G)^1/2 (from m_planck)= 10^19 GeV when solving. Also converted, Critical density = 1.054 h^2 10^-5 GeV/cm^3 (cubed).
 

Attachments

  • qTdd0s7SCP7equ0yiNuhdREgRGMQcxLRhR26ky1jmEbq2mtM4GQp_wUCxbs6cM-Bq27iavKYOKmijptBYkuk=w1366-h654.jpg
    qTdd0s7SCP7equ0yiNuhdREgRGMQcxLRhR26ky1jmEbq2mtM4GQp_wUCxbs6cM-Bq27iavKYOKmijptBYkuk=w1366-h654.jpg
    54.9 KB · Views: 695
Space news on Phys.org
  • #2
First of all, you cannot link to a google drive image like that. You need the image URL, not the URL where google drive will display it for you along with a google drive frame.

It is also unclear to me exactly what you have a problem with because it is unclear exactly what you have done.
 
  • Like
Likes Thiwanka Jayasiri
  • #3
Orodruin said:
First of all, you cannot link to a google drive image like that. You need the image URL, not the URL where google drive will display it for you along with a google drive frame.

It is also unclear to me exactly what you have a problem with because it is unclear exactly what you have done.

Thanks for the tip on the google link. Frist time posting a question here. Let me clarify the question a bit. I want to arrive at the point where 10^-37 cm^2 , for that I used the mentioned values "normalize the equation from its values e.g. spins and x parameter, as g~100, x~10(m/t~10) also I considered the (G)^1/2 (from m_planck)= 10^19 GeV when solving. Also converted, Critical density = 1.054 h^2 10^-5 GeV/cm^3 (cubed)." Hence I need some support to arrive at to that point of 10^-37 cm^2.
 
  • #4
Please use Latex and not a PDF of scribbles.
 
  • Like
Likes Thiwanka Jayasiri
  • #5
Vanadium 50 said:
Please use Latex and not a PDF of scribbles.
Please refer to the below,

$$\Omega_x = \sqrt[]{\frac{4\pi^3G}{45}*g_*(m)}\frac{1}{\langle \sigma\nu\rangle}\frac{x_fT_0^3}{30\rho_cr}$$\\

Considering the facts at WIMP dark matter ,

$$\Omega_X \approx\Omega_dm\approx0.3$$

considering
$$\rho_cr = 1.054h^2 10^{-5} \frac{GeV}{cm^3}$$

$$G^\frac{1}{2} = 10^{19} GeV$$

$$ x = \frac{m}{T}$$
$$ x_f \approx 10$$
$$ g_m \approx 100 $$
$$ T_0 = 10^{-13} GeV$$

Hence the equation for $$\Omega_dm =\sqrt[]{\frac{4\pi^3G}{45}*g_*(m)}\frac{1}{\langle \sigma\nu\rangle}\frac{x_fT_0^3}{30\rho_cr}$$

\clearpage

Need to show that the

$$\Omega_dm =0.3 h^{-2} (\frac{x_f}{10})(\frac{g_*(m)}{100})^\frac{1}{2} \frac{10^{-37}cm^2}{\langle\sigma\nu\rangle}$$

follows from the first equation when baryons are neglected.

considering the normalizing factors, the equation can be rewritten as, taken 0.3 as the magnitude.

$$\Omega_dm =0.3\sqrt[]{\frac{4\pi^3G}{45}}*\sqrt[]{\frac{g_*(m)}{100}}\frac{1}{\langle \sigma\nu\rangle}\frac{x_f}{10}[\frac{T_0^3}{30*1.054h^2*10^{-5}\frac{GeV}{cm^3}}]$$

$$\Omega_dm =0.3 \sqrt[]{\frac{4\pi^3G}{45}} (\frac{g_*(m)}{100})^\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{\langle \sigma\nu\rangle}\frac{x_f}{10}[\frac{(10^{-13} GeV)^3}{30*1.054h^2*10^{-5}\frac{GeV}{cm^3}}]$$

Organizing the above equation to tally with the formula needs to be proven,

$$\Omega_dm = 0.3 h^{-2} (\frac{g_*(m)}{100})^\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{\langle \sigma\nu\rangle}(\frac{x_f}{10}) \sqrt[]{\frac{4\pi^3G}{45}}[\frac{(10^{-13} GeV)^3}{30*1.054*10^{-5}\frac{GeV}{cm^3}}] $$

applying the value of the $$(G^\frac{1}{2})= 10^{19} GeV$$

$$\Omega_dm = 0.3 h^{-2 }(\frac{g_*(m)}{100})^\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{\langle \sigma\nu\rangle}(\frac{x_f}{10}) \sqrt[]{\frac{4\pi^3}{45}}(G)^\frac{1}{2}\frac{(10^{-13} GeV)^3}{30*1.054*10^{-5}\frac{GeV}{cm^3}}] $$

\small $$\Omega_dm = 0.3 h^{-2} (\frac{g_*(m)}{100})^\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{\langle \sigma\nu\rangle}(\frac{x_f}{10}) \sqrt[]{\frac{4\pi^3}{45}}(10^{19})Gev\frac{(10^{-13} GeV)^3}{30*1.054*10^{-5}\frac{GeV}{cm^3}}] $$
 
Last edited:
  • #6
Thiwanka Jayasiri said:
Please refer to the below,

$$\Omega_x = \sqrt[]{\frac{4\pi^3G}{45}*g_*(m)}\frac{1}{\langle \sigma\nu\rangle}\frac{x_fT_0^3}{30\rho_cr}$$\\

Considering the facts at WIMP dark matter ,

$$\Omega_X \approx\Omega_dm\approx0.3$$

considering
$$\rho_cr = 1.054h^2 10^{-5} \frac{GeV}{cm^3}$$

$$G^\frac{1}{2} = 10^{19} GeV$$

$$ x = \frac{m}{T}$$
$$ x_f \approx 10$$
$$ g_m \approx 100 $$
$$ T_0 = 10^{-13} GeV$$

Hence the equation for $$\Omega_dm =\sqrt[]{\frac{4\pi^3G}{45}*g_*(m)}\frac{1}{\langle \sigma\nu\rangle}\frac{x_fT_0^3}{30\rho_cr}$$

\clearpage

Need to show that the

$$\Omega_dm =0.3 h^{-2} (\frac{x_f}{10})(\frac{g_*(m)}{100})^\frac{1}{2} \frac{10^{-37}cm^2}{\langle\sigma\nu\rangle}$$

follows from the first equation when baryons are neglected.

considering the normalizing factors, the equation can be rewritten as, taken 0.3 as the magnitude.

$$\Omega_dm =0.3\sqrt[]{\frac{4\pi^3G}{45}}*\sqrt[]{\frac{g_*(m)}{100}}\frac{1}{\langle \sigma\nu\rangle}\frac{x_f}{10}[\frac{T_0^3}{30*1.054h^2*10^{-5}\frac{GeV}{cm^3}}]$$

$$\Omega_dm =0.3 \sqrt[]{\frac{4\pi^3G}{45}} (\frac{g_*(m)}{100})^\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{\langle \sigma\nu\rangle}\frac{x_f}{10}[\frac{(10^{-13} GeV)^3}{30*1.054h^2*10^{-5}\frac{GeV}{cm^3}}]$$

Organizing the above equation to tally with the formula needs to be proven,

$$\Omega_dm = 0.3 h^{-2} (\frac{g_*(m)}{100})^\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{\langle \sigma\nu\rangle}(\frac{x_f}{10}) \sqrt[]{\frac{4\pi^3G}{45}}[\frac{(10^{-13} GeV)^3}{30*1.054*10^{-5}\frac{GeV}{cm^3}}] $$

applying the value of the $$(G^\frac{1}{2})= 10^{19} GeV$$

$$\Omega_dm = 0.3 h^{-2 }(\frac{g_*(m)}{100})^\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{\langle \sigma\nu\rangle}(\frac{x_f}{10}) \sqrt[]{\frac{4\pi^3}{45}}(G)^\frac{1}{2}\frac{(10^{-13} GeV)^3}{30*1.054*10^{-5}\frac{GeV}{cm^3}}] $$

\small $$\Omega_dm = 0.3 h^{-2} (\frac{g_*(m)}{100})^\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{\langle \sigma\nu\rangle}(\frac{x_f}{10}) \sqrt[]{\frac{4\pi^3}{45}}(10^{19})Gev\frac{(10^{-13} GeV)^3}{30*1.054*10^{-5}\frac{GeV}{cm^3}}] $$

then Equation(1.1) becomes,\

$$\Omega_dm = 0.3 h^{-2} (\frac{g_*(m)}{100})^\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{\langle \sigma\nu\rangle}(\frac{x_f}{10}) \sqrt[]{\frac{4\pi^3}{45}}10^{19}Gev[\frac{(10^{-13} GeV)^3}{30*1.054*10^{-5}\frac{GeV}{cm^3}}] $$

Equation( 1.2)Converting the GeV to eV and Joules got the units of $$[kg][meters^{2}][seconds^{-2}]$$

Hence, we can write the GeV numbers in above equation as follows,

$$10^{19} GeV = 1 *10^{28} eV = 1.602177 *10^{9} J$$
$$10^{-13} GeV = 1 *10^{-4} eV = 1.602177 *10^{-23} J$$
$$316200 eV = 5.066 *10^{-14} J cm^{-3}$$

applying and solving the values in the equation(1.1) reads as follows,

$$\Omega_dm = 0.3 h^{-2} (\frac{g_*(m)}{100})^\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{\langle \sigma\nu\rangle}(\frac{x_f}{10}) (2.1593228 * 10^{-46} J^{3} cm{^3})$$$$\Omega_dm = 0.3 h^{-2} (\frac{g_*(m)}{100})^\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{\langle \sigma\nu\rangle}(\frac{x_f}{10}) (2.1593228 * 10^{-46} kg^{3} m^{6} s^{-6} cm{^3})$$$$\Omega_dm = 0.3 h^{-2} (\frac{g_*(m)}{100})^\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{\langle \sigma\nu\rangle}(\frac{x_f}{10}) (2.1593228 * 10^{-34} kg^{3} s^{-6} cm{^9})$$
 
  • #7
Orodruin said:
First of all, you cannot link to a google drive image like that. You need the image URL, not the URL where google drive will display it for you along with a google drive frame.

It is also unclear to me exactly what you have a problem with because it is unclear exactly what you have done.
Hi, would you be able to help me to check whether Units being used is in order?
 
  • #8
Thiwanka Jayasiri said:
considering the normalizing factors, the equation can be rewritten as, taken 0.3 as the magnitude
It is unclear to me what you are doing here. Where are you getting the 0.3 from? Note that this is not the 0.3 from the observed ##\Omega_{DM}##. You need to insert the nominal values for your parameters into the equation. As a simpler example, consider the typical distance-speed-time relationship ##s = vt## and imagine that you have a typical speed ##v = 1## km/h and a typical time of 1 minute. Your distance ##s## could then be written as
$$
s = vt = \left(\frac{v \cdot \mbox{1 km/h}}{\mbox{1 km/h}}\right) \left(\frac{t \cdot \mbox{1 min}}{\mbox{1 min}}\right)
= \left(\frac{v}{\mbox{1 km/h}}\right) \left(\frac{t}{\mbox{1 min}}\right) \cdot 1~\mbox{min km/h}
\simeq 0.167~\mbox{km} \cdot \left(\frac{v}{\mbox{1 km/h}}\right) \left(\frac{t}{\mbox{1 min}}\right),
$$
since 1 min ≈ 0.167 h. You need to do the corresponding thing for your equation.
 
  • #9
Orodruin said:
It is unclear to me what you are doing here. Where are you getting the 0.3 from? Note that this is not the 0.3 from the observed ##\Omega_{DM}##. You need to insert the nominal values for your parameters into the equation. As a simpler example, consider the typical distance-speed-time relationship ##s = vt## and imagine that you have a typical speed ##v = 1## km/h and a typical time of 1 minute. Your distance ##s## could then be written as
$$
s = vt = \left(\frac{v \cdot \mbox{1 km/h}}{\mbox{1 km/h}}\right) \left(\frac{t \cdot \mbox{1 min}}{\mbox{1 min}}\right)
= \left(\frac{v}{\mbox{1 km/h}}\right) \left(\frac{t}{\mbox{1 min}}\right) \cdot 1~\mbox{min km/h}
\simeq 0.167~\mbox{km} \cdot \left(\frac{v}{\mbox{1 km/h}}\right) \left(\frac{t}{\mbox{1 min}}\right),
$$
since 1 min ≈ 0.167 h. You need to do the corresponding thing for your equation.
Noted, but 0.3 comes as the magnitude of the when applying to the equation. As per the notes given I took magnitude of that to apply into the equation. This is when the freeze-out begins.
The fraction of critical density due to dark matter today,

$$\Omega_{X0}$$ , equation given as
$$\Omega_{x0} = \sqrt[]{\frac{4\pi^3G}{45}*g_*(m)}\frac{1}{\langle \sigma\nu\rangle}\frac{x_fT_0^3}{30\rho_cr}$$\\ then we need to apply the result obtained from the observations and the predictions of the BBN. so I used the 0.3 as magnitued , normalized the $$x_f \approx10 $$ and etc. Could you confirm whether I've used it correctly ? about the $$h^{-2} $$ it comes from $$\rho_{cr}$$

Ref to what you quote; are u saying that if I use the normalizing factors, I've to add $$\frac{10}{1} (\frac{1}{100})^\frac{1}{2} \frac{1}{0.3}$$ respectively to the equation?
 
Last edited:
  • #10
You should not be "adding" anything to the equation. It is a matter of multiplying by ones (e.g., 1 = 1 km/ 1 km) and then extracting the numerator.
 
  • Like
Likes Thiwanka Jayasiri
  • #11
Orodruin said:
You should not be "adding" anything to the equation. It is a matter of multiplying by ones (e.g., 1 = 1 km/ 1 km) and then extracting the numerator.
ok, if I plug in the nominal values into the equation
$$\Omega_dm =\sqrt[]{\frac{4\pi^3G}{45}*g_*(m)}\frac{1}{\langle \sigma\nu\rangle}\frac{x_fT_0^3}{30\rho_cr}$$

$$\Omega_m =\sqrt[]{\frac{4\pi^3
10^{19} GeV }{45}*g_*(m)}\frac{1}{\langle \sigma\nu\rangle}\frac{x_f(10^{-13}GeV)^3}{(30*1.054*h^{2}10^{-5} \frac{GeV}{cm^3})}$$

Still didnt apply the followings,

$$g_*(a_1) = 2 + 16 + 7+8+(30 + 30 + 12 + 12) = 91.5$$
$$g_*\approx100$$

if I'm getting this properly at CDM, WIMP $$X\approx 100GeV$$
 
  • #12
You also need to plug in the nominal values for the cross section, ##g_*##, and ##x_f##. In addition, your result is dimensionally inconsistent because you inserted ##\sqrt{G}## instead of ##G##.
 
  • #13
Orodruin said:
You also need to plug in the nominal values for the cross section, ##g_*##, and ##x_f##. In addition, your result is dimensionally inconsistent because you inserted ##\sqrt{G}## instead of ##G##.
$$\Omega_m =\sqrt[]{\frac{4\pi^3
10^{19} GeV }{45}*(100)}\frac{1}{\langle \sigma\nu\rangle}\frac{(10)*(10^{-13}GeV)^3}{(30*1.054*h^{2}10^{-5} \frac{GeV}{cm^3})}$$
 
  • #14
Thiwanka Jayasiri said:
$$\Omega_m =\sqrt[]{\frac{4\pi^3
10^{19} GeV }{45}*(100)}\frac{1}{\langle \sigma\nu\rangle}\frac{(10)*(10^{-13}GeV)^3}{(30*1.054*h^{2}10^{-5} \frac{GeV}{cm^3})}$$
$$g_{x0} $$ value at T = 0.1 MeV $$\approx 100$$
 
  • #15
Orodruin said:
You also need to plug in the nominal values for the cross-section, ##g_*##, and ##x_f##. In addition, your result is dimensionally inconsistent because you inserted ##\sqrt{G}## instead of ##G##.
Hi add the values the equation but I'm still not getting the numerator part, because I'm missing the ##g_*##, and ##x_f##. For me to add that is it fine to include those to the equation ? or what's the best move?
 
  • #16
Orodruin said:
You should not be "adding" anything to the equation. It is a matter of multiplying by ones (e.g., 1 = 1 km/ 1 km) and then extracting the numerator.
solving part by part,\

part 1, $$\sqrt[]{\frac{4\pi^3 10^{19} GeV }{45}*(100)} = 6.64513 \frac{(kg^{\frac{1}{2}})m}{s}$$

part 2, $$10*(10^{-13}GeV)^{3} = 1*10^{-38}GeV^{3} = 1 * 10^{-11} eV^{3}= 4.112739 *10^{-68}J^{3}$$\
$$= 4.122739 *10^{-68}\frac{kg^{3}m^{6}}{s^{6}}$$

part 3, $$30*1.054*10^{-5} \frac{\small GeV}{\small cm^3} =5.066*10^{-8}\frac{kg}{ms^{2}} $$

summing (part 1,2 and 3 up we get,

$$\frac{(6.64513*4.112739)*10^{-68}}{(5.066)*10^{-8}} \frac{kg^{\frac{5}{2}}m^{8}}{s^5}$$
adding the same to the equation ()

$$\frac{1}{h^2}\frac{1}{\langle \sigma\nu\rangle}\frac{(6.64513*4.112739)*10^{-68}}{(5.066)*10^{-8}} \frac{kg^{\frac{5}{2}}m^{8}}{s^5}$$

could further simplified,

$$\frac{1}{h^2}\frac{1}{\langle \sigma\nu\rangle} (1.000...) \frac{kg^{\frac{5}{2}}m^{8}}{s^5}$$
 
  • #17
Thiwanka Jayasiri said:
Hi add the values the equation but I'm still not getting the numerator part, because I'm missing the ##g_*##, and ##x_f##. For me to add that is it fine to include those to the equation ? or what's the best move?
What if I ignore the units of part 2 and part 3 since $$\rho_{cr} \propto T_0^3 $$
 
  • #18
Again, you are inserting ##G^{1/2}## instead of ##G##. I am out of here until you fix that.
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50 and Thiwanka Jayasiri
  • #19
Orodruin said:
Again, you are inserting ##G^{1/2}## instead of ##G##. I am out of here until you fix that.
part 1, $$\sqrt[]{\frac{4\pi^3 10^{19} GeV }{45}*(100)} = 6.64513 \frac{(kg^{\frac{1}{2}})m}{s}$$

$$\sqrt[]{\frac{4\pi^3}{45}*(100)} * (G^\frac{1}{2})*\frac{G^\frac{1}{2}}{G^\frac{1}{2}} $$

$$\sqrt[]{\frac{4\pi^3}{45}*(100)} * (\frac{G}{G^\frac{1}{2}}) $$

else I can write it as,

$$\sqrt[]{\frac{4\pi^3}{45}*(100)} * (\frac{G^{\frac{3}{2}}}{G}) $$
 
  • #20
No. I am not sure I can say it in another way, you are using ##\sqrt G## instead of ##G##. G is not 1e19 GeV.

See http://pdg.lbl.gov/1998/consrpp.pdf

I cannot help you if you are unable to insert values into a given equation properly.
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50
  • #21
Orodruin said:
No. I am not sure I can say it in another way, you are using ##\sqrt G## instead of ##G##. G is not 1e19 GeV.

See http://pdg.lbl.gov/1998/consrpp.pdf

I cannot help you if you are unable to insert values into a given equation properly.
I'm new to physics hence please excuse me, I guess you are referring to, ##6.707 11(86)×10^{−39} ~c (GeV/c2)−2##
 
  • #22
Orodruin said:
No. I am not sure I can say it in another way, you are using ##\sqrt G## instead of ##G##. G is not 1e19 GeV.

See http://pdg.lbl.gov/1998/consrpp.pdf

I cannot help you if you are unable to insert values into a given equation properly.
$$\sqrt[]{\frac{4\pi^3 G}{45}*(100)} = \sqrt[]{\frac{4\pi^3 *6.707 11(86)×10^{−39} (GeV/c^{2})^{−2 }}{45}*(100)} $$
 
  • #23
Thiwanka Jayasiri said:
$$\sqrt[]{\frac{4\pi^3 G}{45}*(100)} = \sqrt[]{\frac{4\pi^3 *6.707 11(86)×10^{−39} (GeV/c^{2})^{−2 }}{45}*(100)} $$

Reuslt:
gif&s=47.gif
 

Attachments

  • gif&s=47.gif
    gif&s=47.gif
    2.6 KB · Views: 449
  • #24
Orodruin said:
It is unclear to me what you are doing here. Where are you getting the 0.3 from? Note that this is not the 0.3 from the observed ##\Omega_{DM}##. You need to insert the nominal values for your parameters into the equation. As a simpler example, consider the typical distance-speed-time relationship ##s = vt## and imagine that you have a typical speed ##v = 1## km/h and a typical time of 1 minute. Your distance ##s## could then be written as
$$
s = vt = \left(\frac{v \cdot \mbox{1 km/h}}{\mbox{1 km/h}}\right) \left(\frac{t \cdot \mbox{1 min}}{\mbox{1 min}}\right)
= \left(\frac{v}{\mbox{1 km/h}}\right) \left(\frac{t}{\mbox{1 min}}\right) \cdot 1~\mbox{min km/h}
\simeq 0.167~\mbox{km} \cdot \left(\frac{v}{\mbox{1 km/h}}\right) \left(\frac{t}{\mbox{1 min}}\right),
$$
since 1 min ≈ 0.167 h. You need to do the corresponding thing for your equation.
solving part by part,\

Equation (1)\\
Need to show that the below Equation (2)
\small
$$\Omega_dm =0.3 h^{-2} (\frac{x_f}{10})(\frac{g_*(m)}{100})^\frac{1}{2} \frac{10^{-37}cm^2}{\langle\sigma\nu\rangle}$$
Equation(2 )\ follows from the first equation when baryons are neglected.

\small
$$\Omega_m =\sqrt[]{\frac{4\pi^3
10^{19} GeV }{45}*(100)}\frac{1}{\langle \sigma\nu\rangle}\frac{(10)*(10^{-13}GeV)^3}{(30*1.054*h^{2}10^{-5} \frac{GeV}{cm^3})}$$
\clearpage
\small
solving part by part,\

part 1,

$$\sqrt{\frac{4\pi^3G}{45}*(100)} = \sqrt[]{\frac{4\pi^3*6.70711(86)*10^{-39}(\frac{GeV}{c^{2}})^{-2}*(100)}{45}}$$

solving the part 1 equation,

$$\sqrt[]{\frac{4\pi^3*6.70711(86)*10^{-39}(\frac{GeV}{c^{2}})^{-2}*(100)}{45}} = 3.137*10^{-21} \frac{kg^{2}m^{6}}{s^{6}}$$

part 2, $$10*(10^{-13}GeV)^{3} = 10*10^{-39}GeV^{3} = 1 * 10^{-29} eV^{3}= 1.602177*10^{-49}J^{3}$$\
$$= 1.602177*10^{-48}\frac{kg^{3}m^{6}}{s^{6}}$$

part 3, $$30*1.054*10^{-5} \frac{\small GeV}{\small cm^3} =5.066*10^{-8}\frac{kg}{ms^{2}} $$
$$\frac{P1 * P2}{P3}$$summing part 1,2 and 3 up we get,

\large
$$\frac{(5.078909*10^{-69}\frac{kg^3 m^6}{s^6})}{(5.066*10^{-8} \frac{kg}{s^{2}}\frac{m^{6}kg^{2}}{s^4})}(\frac{s^4}{m^7 kg^2})(\frac{1}{kg})$$$$1.00254 * 10^{-61} \frac{1}{ms^{2}}$$

adding the same to the equation (2)

$$\frac{1}{h^2}\frac{1}{\langle \sigma\nu\rangle}1.00254 * 10^{-61} \frac{1}{ms^{2}}$$
Hi, could you check and adv.
 
Last edited:
  • #25
Thiwanka Jayasiri said:
I'm new to physics

You have marked this thread as "A" level (and its subject matter seems to be consistent with that). That means you are expected to have graduate level background in the subject matter. If you are really new to physics, then you are trying to tackle a problem that is well beyond your background knowledge, and you should probably take the time to get the necessary background first.

Thiwanka Jayasiri said:
could you check and adv

In an "A" level thread you should not be asking others to check every significant result of your math; you should be able to do correct math yourself at this level without requiring constant checking.
 

1. What is WIMP and why is it important in solving the dark matter equation?

WIMP stands for Weakly Interacting Massive Particle, which is a hypothetical type of particle that is believed to make up a large portion of the universe's dark matter. It is important in solving the dark matter equation because it is a leading candidate for explaining the missing mass in the universe and has been the focus of many research efforts.

2. How do scientists currently approach solving the WIMP and dark matter equation?

Currently, scientists use a combination of theoretical models, observations from astrophysical and cosmological studies, and experiments with particle accelerators to try and understand the properties and behavior of WIMPs and how they may contribute to dark matter. This multidisciplinary approach allows for a comprehensive investigation of the unknown nature of dark matter.

3. What are the challenges faced in solving the WIMP and dark matter equation?

One of the main challenges is the lack of direct evidence for the existence of WIMPs and dark matter. This means that scientists must rely on indirect observations and theoretical models to study and understand these particles. Additionally, the properties of WIMPs, such as their mass and interaction strength, are still not well understood, making it difficult to accurately model their behavior.

4. Are there any current theories or hypotheses that offer potential solutions to the WIMP and dark matter equation?

Yes, there are several theories and hypotheses that have been proposed to explain the nature of dark matter and its potential connection to WIMPs. These include Supersymmetry, Extra Dimensions, and Axion particles, among others. However, more research and evidence are needed to confirm or refute these theories.

5. What impact will solving the WIMP and dark matter equation have on our understanding of the universe?

Solving the WIMP and dark matter equation would have a significant impact on our understanding of the universe. It would not only help us fill in the missing pieces of the puzzle in our current understanding of the universe's composition and evolution but also potentially lead to new discoveries and advancements in physics and cosmology. It could also have implications for the search for life in other parts of the universe, as dark matter is thought to play a crucial role in the formation of galaxies and the conditions necessary for life to exist.

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
2K
  • Cosmology
Replies
2
Views
894
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Cosmology
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
919
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Cosmology
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top