Sound: Speakers Woofers vs. Tweeters

  • Thread starter Thread starter JoshMG
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sound
JoshMG
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Why are speakers that are used to produce low notes such as woofers bigger than speakers used to produce higher notes such as tweeters?


The idea that I have is that, lower notes have higher frequency which is harder to hear so in order to hear it has to be produced my a bigger instrument.

But I'm not sure if it's right.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Woof! Tweet!

JoshMG said:
Why are speakers that are used to produce low notes such as woofers bigger than speakers used to produce higher notes such as tweeters?

The idea that I have is that, lower notes have higher frequency which is harder to hear so in order to hear it has to be produced my a bigger instrument.

But I'm not sure if it's right.

hi JoshMG!

i don't really know anything about woofing and tweeting, 'cos I'm only a goldfish :blushing: … but i do know some sea bass …

so i think it's the same reason why bass organ pipes and bass fiddles are so large! :biggrin:
 
Firstly, lower notes have lower, not higher, frequencies.

Looking at the equation:

wavespeed = frequency * wavelength

Since all sound waves travel approximately at the same speed (340 metres per second) this means that low notes must have long wavelengths.

In Summary:

LOW NOTES = LOW FREQUENCY = LONG WAVELENGTH

Because of these long wavelengths and the fact that the bass part of the spectrum takes more energy to reproduce than any other part, large amounts of air need to be moved to recreate a bass note.

Large speakers have a greater mass and therefore more inertia which means they cannot move fast enough to produce high frequencies. Although small speakers are capable of vibrating slow enough to match bass notes, they won't push enough air at low speeds to be audible, so a large surface area is required to produce the lower-range sounds. Hence big woofers!

Hope this helped.
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top