- #1
GTOM
- 955
- 64
Sorry for my speculative question, i just wondered, is there any sensible theory that thinks strong nuclei force is so weak in the distance, because it isn't three dimensional?
Again i don't intend to say my speculations are facts, but i think the above question needs a bit explanation.
I would think, since the surface of a three dimensional orb depends on square of the radius, the power of a three dimensional orb shaped field should decrease with square of the radius. But strong nuclei force is stronger than repulsive electric force at very low distance, but much weaker at larger distance, that is why heavy elements are unstable.
If this speculation is totally wrong, i would like to have a reading material about that phenonemon, since i only learned about theese things in middle school.
Again i don't intend to say my speculations are facts, but i think the above question needs a bit explanation.
I would think, since the surface of a three dimensional orb depends on square of the radius, the power of a three dimensional orb shaped field should decrease with square of the radius. But strong nuclei force is stronger than repulsive electric force at very low distance, but much weaker at larger distance, that is why heavy elements are unstable.
If this speculation is totally wrong, i would like to have a reading material about that phenonemon, since i only learned about theese things in middle school.