SU(2) Pure YM on R^4: Derivation and Solutions

  • Thread starter Charles_Henry
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Pure Su(2)
Then, show that A_{\mu} (cx) is also a solution with the same action.In summary, we are asked to derive the pure SU(2) YM theory on \mathbb{R}^4 from the action and show that \tilde{A}_{\mu} (cx) is also a solution with the same action, which can be done by using the Euler-Lagrange equations and taking into account the scale-invariance of pure YM.
  • #1
Charles_Henry
14
0

Homework Statement



Derive the pure SU(2) YM theory on [itex] \mathbb{R}^4 [/itex] from the action. Let [itex] A_{\mu} (x) [/itex] be a solution to these equations. Show:

[itex]\tilde{A}_{\mu} (cx) [/itex] is also a solution (with the same action).Background

The Euclidean YM action

[itex] \mathbb{S} = - \int_{\mathbb{R^4}} Tr (F \wedge \ast F) [/itex]

yields

[itex] D \ast F = 0 [/itex]

Let [itex] \ast: \wedge^{p} \rightarrow \wedge^{D+1-p} [/itex] be a linear map, such that

[itex] \ast (dx^{\mu_{1}} \wedge ... \wedge dx^{\mu_{p}} = \frac{\sqrt{|det(n)!|}}{(D+1-p)!} \epsilon^{\mu_{1}...\mu_{p}}_{{\mu}_{p+1}...{\mu}_{D+1}} dx^{\mu}_{p+1} \wedge ... \wedge dx^{{\mu}_{p+1}} [/itex]

if [itex] G = SU(2) [/itex] we choose a basis [itex] T_{a}, a = 1, 2, 3 [/itex] for an Anti-Hermitian 2 x 2 matrix

[itex] T_{a}, T_{b} [/itex] = [itex] - \epsilon_{abc} T_{c}, T_{a} = \frac{1}{2} i \sigma_{a} [/itex]

where [itex] Tr(T_{a}, T_{b}) = - \frac {1}{2} \delta_{ab} [/itex]

where [itex] \sigma_{a} [/itex] are pauli matrices, and a general group element [itex] g = exp (\alpha^{a} T_{a} ) [/itex] with [itex] \alpha^a [/itex] real. Whence,

[itex] (D_{\mu} \phi)^{a} = \partial_{\mu} \phi^{a} - \epsilon^{abc} A^{b}_{\mu} \phi^{c} [/itex] and [itex] F^{a}_{{\mu} v} = \partial_{\mu} A^{a}_{v} - \partial_{v}A^{a}_{\mu} - \epsilon^{abc}A^{b}_{\mu}A^{c}_{v} [/itex]

when [itex] D+1=4 [/itex] is a gauge theory in Minkowski space [itex] M [/itex], and [itex] A [/itex] is the gauge potential,

[itex] ( \ast F)_{{\mu}v} = \frac{1}{2} \epsilon_{{\mu}v{\alpha}{\beta}}F^{{\alpha}{\beta}} [/itex]

A two form [itex] F= \frac{1}{2} F_{{\mu}v}dx^{\mu} \wedge dx^{v} [/itex] is self dual or ASD when [itex] \ast F = F [/itex] and [itex] \ast F = - F [/itex] respectively

[itex] -Tr ( F \wedge \ast F) = - \frac{1}{2} Tr (F_{{\mu}v}F^{{\mu}v}) d^{4}x = \frac{1}{4}F^{a}_{{\mu}v}F^{{\mu}va} d^{a}x [/itex]

[itex] d^{4}x = \frac{1}{24} \epsilon_{{\mu}v{\alpha}{\beta}}dx^{\mu} \wedge dx^{v} \wedge dx^{\alpha} \wedge dx^{\beta} [/itex]

with identities

[itex] \epsilon_{{\mu}v{\alpha}{\beta}}dx^{4} = - dx^{4} \wedge dx^{v} \wedge dx^{\alpha} \wedge dx^{\beta} [/itex]

and [itex] \epsilon_{{\alpha}{\beta}{\rho}{\sigma}} \epsilon^{{\mu}{v}{\rho}{\sigma}} = - 4 (\delta^{\mu}_{\alpha} \delta^{v}_{\beta}) [/itex]

Instantons are non-singular solutions of classical equations of motion in Euclidean space whose Action is finite.

[itex] F_{{\mu}v} (x)[/itex] ~ [itex] O (\frac{1}{r^3}) [/itex]

[itex] A_{\mu} [/itex] ~ [itex] \partial_{\mu} gg^{-1} + O \frac{1}{r^2} [/itex] as [itex] r \rightarrow \infty [/itex]

note: I understand that the gauge transformations g(x) needs to be defined only asymptotically, so [itex] g: \mathbb{S}^{3}_{\infty} \rightarrow SU(2) [/itex] is extended to [itex] \mathbb{R}^4 [/itex] if its degree vanishes:

For example:

If [itex] M_{1} [/itex] and [itex] M_{2} [/itex] are oriented, compact, D-dimensional manifolds without boundary, and [itex] w [/itex] is a volume-form on [itex] M_{2} [/itex]. where [itex] deg (f) [/itex] of a smooth map [itex] f: M_{1} \rightarrow M_{2} [/itex] is given by

[itex] \int_{M_{1}} f\ast w = [ deg(f) ] \int_{M_{2}} w [/itex]

let [itex] y \in M_{2} [/itex] when [itex] f^{-1}(y) = {x; f(x) = y} [/itex] is finite, and the Jacobian [itex] J(f) [/itex] is not zero (if [itex] x \in U [/itex] with local coordinates [itex] x^{i} [/itex] and [itex] y \in f(u) [/itex] with local co-ordinates [itex] y^{i} [/itex], then we can assume:

[itex] \mathbb{J} = det \frac{\partial y^{i}}{\partial x^{J}} [/itex] if [itex] y^{i} (x^{1}, ... x^{D}) [/itex]

deg (f) is an integer given by

[itex] deg (f) = \Sigma_{x \in f^{-1} (y)} sign [ \mathbb{J} (x) ][/itex]

(proof withheld)

therefore:

[itex] f: X \rightarrow SU(2) = S^{3} [/itex] where X is closed.

[itex] deg(f) = \frac{1}{24\pi^2} \int_{X} Tr[(f^{-1} df)^3] [/itex]

the boundary conditions are understood in terms of one-point compactifications [itex] S^4 = \mathbb{R}^4 \cup {\infty} [/itex] which has a conformally equivalent metric to that of a flat metric in [itex] \mathbb{R}^4 [/itex]

A solution of YM equations on [itex] S^4 [/itex] project stereographically to a connection on [itex] \mathbb{R}^4 [/itex] with a curvature which vanishes at infinity.

Scaling Argument:

A Field(s) [itex] (A, \phi) [/itex] given by a potential one-form and a scalar higgs-field:

[itex] E = \int_{\mathbb{R}} d^{D}x [|F|^{2} + |D \phi |^{2} + U(\phi) [/itex]

[itex] = E_{F} + E_{D_{\phi}} + E_{U} [/itex]

if [itex] A(x) [/itex] and [itex] \phi (x) [/itex] are critical points:

[itex] \phi_{c} (x) = \phi (cx) [/itex]

[itex] A_{c} (x) = cA(cx) [/itex]

[itex] F_{c} = C^{2} F(cx) [/itex]

[itex] D_{c} \phi_{c} = c D\phi (cx) [/itex]

which leads to

[itex]E_{(c)} = \frac{1}{C^{D-4}}E_{F} + \frac{1}{C^{D+2}}E_{D_{\phi}} + \frac{1}{C^{D}}E_{U} [/itex]

[itex] (D-4) E_{F} + (D-2) E_{D_{\phi}} + DE_{U} = 0 [/itex]

note: I believe I am looking for a solution where [itex] E_{D_{\phi}} = E_{U} = 0 [/itex] in D=4

The Attempt at a Solution



A YM action S within a given topological sector

[itex] c_{2} = \frac{1}{8 \pi^2} \int_{\mathbb{R}} Tr( F \wedge F) > 0 [/itex]

bounded from below by [itex] 8\pi^2c_{2} [/itex]

[itex] F \wedge F = \ast F \wedge \ast F [/itex]

[itex] \mathbb{S} = - \frac{1}{2} \int_{\mathbb{R}^4} Tr[(F + \ast F) \wedge (F + \ast F)] + \int_{\mathbb{R}^4} Tr (F \wedge F) = - \frac{1}{2} \int_{\mathbb{R}^4} Tr [(F + \ast F) \wedge \ast (F + \ast F) + 8 \pi^2c_{2} \geq 8 \pi^2c_{2} [/itex]

when [itex] F = - \ast F [/itex] hold

some bib: Atiyah, M.F and Ward, R.S (1977) Instantons and Algebraic Geometry, Commun. Math. Phy. 55, 117-124

Sacks, L. and uhlenbeck, K (1981) The existence of minimal immersions of 2-spheres, Ann. Math 113, 1-24
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
nonsense
 
Last edited:
  • #3
more nonsense.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
ok, i see it now...derive the euler-lagrange equations from the action that leads to gauge potential. Assume we could derive a solution of pure YM IN R^4 from the Vector Potential by defining invariance along any coordinate of our choosing.
 
Last edited:
  • #5
This is meant to be much simpler than you're making it out to be.

Charles_Henry said:
Derive the pure SU(2) YM theory on [itex] \mathbb{R}^4 [/itex] from the action.

Literally use the Euler-Lagrange equations to obtain the equation of motion for the gauge potential.

Let [itex] A_{\mu} (x) [/itex] be a solution to these equations. Show:

[itex]\tilde{A}_{\mu} (cx) [/itex] is also a solution (with the same action).

This is meant to follow from the scale-invariance of pure YM. Assume [itex] A_{\mu} (x) [/itex] is a solution. Consider [itex] A_{\mu} (cx) [/itex] and make a change of coordinates, taking into account that [itex]A_\mu[/itex] scales like a tensor of the appropriate degree.
 

1. What is SU(2) Pure YM on R^4?

SU(2) Pure YM on R^4 refers to a specific mathematical model used in theoretical physics, specifically in the study of quantum field theory and gauge theory. It involves the use of the special unitary group SU(2) to describe the behavior of a non-Abelian gauge field on a four-dimensional space.

2. What is the significance of studying SU(2) Pure YM on R^4?

Studying SU(2) Pure YM on R^4 allows for a better understanding of the behavior of non-Abelian gauge fields, which are fundamental to the Standard Model of particle physics. This model also has applications in other areas of physics, such as condensed matter physics and cosmology.

3. How is SU(2) Pure YM on R^4 derived?

The derivation of SU(2) Pure YM on R^4 involves using mathematical techniques such as Lie algebra, group theory, and differential geometry. It is a complex process that requires a strong background in mathematics and physics.

4. What are the solutions to SU(2) Pure YM on R^4?

The solutions to SU(2) Pure YM on R^4 are known as instantons, which are topologically non-trivial solutions to the Yang-Mills equations. These solutions play a crucial role in understanding the behavior of non-Abelian gauge fields and have important implications in particle physics and cosmology.

5. What are some current research areas related to SU(2) Pure YM on R^4?

Some current research areas related to SU(2) Pure YM on R^4 include the study of instanton solutions in different dimensions, the application of this model to other areas of physics, such as superstring theory, and the investigation of its implications for the behavior of particles and fields in the early universe.

Similar threads

  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
0
Views
663
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
0
Views
295
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
805
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
863
Back
Top