- #1
jmjlt88
- 96
- 0
Let r and s be positive integers. Show that {nr + ms | n,m ε Z} is a subgroup of Z
Proof: ---- "SKETCH" -----
Let r , s be positive integers. Consider the set {nr + ms | n,m ε Z}. We wish to show that this set is a subgroup of Z.
Closure
Let a , b ε {nr + ms | n,m ε Z}. Then, a = n1r1 + m1s1 and b = n2r2 + m2s2. Computing a + b (since we are considering Z under additon?), we get
a + b = n1r1 + m1s1 + n2r2 + m2s2.
... All of these elements are integers and our result will again be an integer, and hence a+b will be in our set.
Identity
If we take n,m = 0, we will have 0 ε {nr + ms | n,m ε Z}... Thus, the identity exists.
Inverses
Let a = nr + ms. Take a-1= -nr+-ms since -n,-m ε Z
... Hence, inverses exist our set.
QED
Any huge mistakes?
Proof: ---- "SKETCH" -----
Let r , s be positive integers. Consider the set {nr + ms | n,m ε Z}. We wish to show that this set is a subgroup of Z.
Closure
Let a , b ε {nr + ms | n,m ε Z}. Then, a = n1r1 + m1s1 and b = n2r2 + m2s2. Computing a + b (since we are considering Z under additon?), we get
a + b = n1r1 + m1s1 + n2r2 + m2s2.
... All of these elements are integers and our result will again be an integer, and hence a+b will be in our set.
Identity
If we take n,m = 0, we will have 0 ε {nr + ms | n,m ε Z}... Thus, the identity exists.
Inverses
Let a = nr + ms. Take a-1= -nr+-ms since -n,-m ε Z
... Hence, inverses exist our set.
QED
Any huge mistakes?