To keep a long story short, I'm confused.

In summary, you are a first time poster, and you are currently in your third year of undergraduate study. A lot about you- you have a terrible GPA from what you say is a lack of passion for the subjects, but is more likely because you are lazy. You have considered either dropping out or taking a break to get your head on straight, but you are afraid of being stuck in a sunk cost fallacy. You have read a wide range of literature on math without doing any math, and you have learned about Euclid to Gauss to Wiles to Perelman. You say that when you do math, you find yourself enjoying it. However, you are unsure if this is an isolated problem or if you have this
  • #1
DrDoom
4
0
And now for the long story.

I'm a first time poster, long time reader. A little bit about me, I am in my third year of undergrad studying way too many subjects yet not studying at all. I have jumped from philosophy, to physics, to bio, to economics, and now math. During this time, I've racked up a terrible GPA from what I want to say is a lack of passion for the subjects, (evident from all the switching) but is more likely because I am lazy. I have considered either dropping out or taking a break to get my head on straight, but a combination of being stuck in a sunk cost fallacy, parental pressure and a romanticized view of education won't let me.

I have this idea that mathematicians and scientist wake up every morning excited to unravel the mysteries of the universe. With math, I feel like that's what they do, as it is known as the "Queen of the Sciences". And yet I feel as though studying math is a bit too detached as a career choice. It's impersonal as all the concepts are so abstract and the act of discovery is usually done in seclusion. Whereas I would prefer something that if I could not at least do with others, I would be able to tell people about in casual conversation or apply to daily life. For instance, I also have an interest in evolutionary biology, stock investing, and fiction writing. And these all seem to have more of an element of understanding humanity to them.

Over the past couple of months I have read a wide range of literature about math without doing any actual math, minus the few courses I'm taking right now. I've learned about Euclid to Gauss to Wiles to Perelman, and I feel as though my envy towards the greats has left me delusional to what studying math actually entails. I can't seem to find the will power to open an actual math book, but when I do I find myself actually enjoying the work. I don't think this is an isolated problem I have with math, but with anything I would consider work.

So anyway, the academic questions to which I seek your guidance is, taking into account my story, what is required to study math at a higher level? Would a passion for it develop as I delved deeper in the subject? And most importantly, is math for me, or is it too late? Should I pursue something else? I feel like I'm just waiting for that one thing that completely captivates me to reveal itself, and when it does, I can wake up excited to do it and finally get my **** together. I know, too many movies. My apologies for all the rambling, I appreciate any help you can give me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You sound like a confused kid. I know I was once a confused kid. And I know taking more classes certainly did not help me figure any stuff out.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
DrDoom said:
I have this idea that mathematicians and scientist wake up every morning excited to unravel the mysteries of the universe. With math, I feel like that's what they do, as it is known as the "Queen of the Sciences". And yet I feel as though studying math is a bit too detached as a career choice. It's impersonal as all the concepts are so abstract and the act of discovery is usually done in seclusion. Whereas I would prefer something that if I could not at least do with others, I would be able to tell people about in casual conversation or apply to daily life. For instance, I also have an interest in evolutionary biology, stock investing, and fiction writing. And these all seem to have more of an element of understanding humanity to them.

Where did you get any of these ideas? Science is very much a collaborative effort. Also, remember, someone has to pay scientists to do science, so while scientists really do science at their place of work, they have the usual issues that any working person has. They have people overlooking their work, deadlines, obligations they couldn't care less about, and that kinda stuff can also be on their mind. So yes, it's quite romanticized. Of course, since every job is kind of like that, in the end you deal with the BS to find out the universe is expanding vs. a graphic designer dealing with the BS to... be able to create a video for a Chinese shoe manufacturer's website.

So anyway, the academic questions to which I seek your guidance is, taking into account my story, what is required to study math at a higher level? Would a passion for it develop as I delved deeper in the subject? And most importantly, is math for me, or is it too late? Should I pursue something else? I feel like I'm just waiting for that one thing that completely captivates me to reveal itself, and when it does, I can wake up excited to do it and finally get my **** together. I know, too many movies. My apologies for all the rambling, I appreciate any help you can give me.

I don't think there's a guarantee you'll develop a passion. You may or may not, but who cares? A vast majority of people don't have a passion for their job, but they still enjoy it. You can pursue math, but if you're lazy and can't sit down and do the work, you'll fail at it. In fact, you'll fail at everything if that's the case so the most important thing is to fix that problem first.
 
  • #4
I can relate. In my freshman year of college I even found myself in a literary theory seminar. I was confused in every way. Now I've found out more or less what I want to do. First, make sure that your confusion isn't a symptom of an underlying psychiatric problem. If you're sure it isn't, then I recommend trying to reverse engineer. Think about what you want you would be happy doing for 60+ years. Do you want to work in academia, healthcare, industry? It helped me to get a reality check and realize that college and graduate school would only take a fraction of my life, and that at some point I would enter the world as an x or a y and that what I studied would affect what I could do after school. Sure, I'm interested in philosophy and social theory, but I don't want to teach philosophy for the rest of my life or work in a publishing house. Sorry if this comes off as too pragmatic, but it really helped me get things straight.
 
  • #5
DrDoom said:
So anyway, the academic questions to which I seek your guidance is, taking into account my story, what is required to study math at a higher level?

Hard, concentrated work geared exactly to the syllabus - stop reading all those history books!

As you don't have much motivation, pretend it's a nine to five job, and work really hard at it for seven hours a day, even if you don't feel like it and don't enjoy the process. You may remain bored throughout the year, in which case Maths isn't for you. But at least you'll have learned something about having to work hard at a job you don't like - good preparation for the real world. And by working that hard you'll probably get a decent degree (if you don't then you *really* know Mathematics isn't for you!)

DrDoom said:
I feel like I'm just waiting for that one thing that completely captivates me to reveal itself, and when it does, I can wake up excited to do it and finally get my **** together.

I doubt something will just reveal itself. For now, why don't you just knuckle down and get that degree, at least you'll get a better job that way. You say you like finance and working with people. So why not be a bank teller or investment adviser? With a degree you'll start at a higher level, make more money, have more variety & opportunity. That would be better than just dropping the study and getting a really lowly job. If you work in a simple high-street 9 to 5 bank you'll have money & enough energy to try out different stuff in your spare time. Given your lack of interest in the academic science stuff why not try photography, poetry, cycling... who knows where you'll find something that really floats your boat (hmmm... sailing that's a good idea...)
 
  • #6
Here's a question:

Put yourself in a hypothetical scenario in which you are no longer in school, have 100% of your time to yourself, and also have an unlimited amount of money given you to for the purpose of purchasing books, textbooks, and also perhaps hiring private tutors; maybe you even have enough money to buy yourself a whole chem lab. Additionally, assume that you do not have to work to support yourself, and furthermore assume that you have enough money to keep this scenario going indefinitely.

What would you spend your time studying?
 
  • #7
Thanks for the great advice everyone. I've always envied those med school kids who knew exactly what they wanted since they were 5 for what ever reason, and now they just have to work hard to get it. I guess for me the hard work will have to come before the passion, if I ever find it. I suppose all I can do for now is knuckle down and get the degree.

And yet I can't help shake the feeling that I might be making the wrong choice. For instance, at one point during my schooling, I had decided I wanted to study physics. But then I read some Dawkins's books on evolutionary biology and decided that was what I really wanted to study. Even thinking about it now, I kind of want to switch back and do that. I guess what I'm trying to say is that I find a lot of things interesting and I'm afraid that by picking one of them, I could have done better at another.

As for what I want to do for the next 60+ years or what I would do with unlimited resources, I would be lying if I didn't say sipping Martinis on my yacht while studying human mating rituals. But seriously, I have no idea, I would probably do what I'm doing now, being very confused and reading a bit of everything without being able to commit to one thing. Maybe I should just get into the Chinese shoe manufacture video designing business.
 
  • #8
victor.raum said:
Here's a question:

Put yourself in a hypothetical scenario in which you are no longer in school, have 100% of your time to yourself, and also have an unlimited amount of money given you to for the purpose of purchasing books, textbooks, and also perhaps hiring private tutors; maybe you even have enough money to buy yourself a whole chem lab. Additionally, assume that you do not have to work to support yourself, and furthermore assume that you have enough money to keep this scenario going indefinitely.

What would you spend your time studying?

This is great advice. When I found myself on leave from college I drifted back to the things that I'd read and studied as a kid, before intense schooling really began. The way I thought about it was to pretend that society imploded, that I was sent off to some camp somewhere to live out the rest of my life, or that I was put in prison for the rest of my life. What would I spend my time doing or studying?
 
  • #9
DrDoom said:
As for what I want to do for the next 60+ years or what I would do with unlimited resources, I would be lying if I didn't say sipping Martinis on my yacht while studying human mating rituals. But seriously, I have no idea, I would probably do what I'm doing now, being very confused and reading a bit of everything without being able to commit to one thing. Maybe I should just get into the Chinese shoe manufacture video designing business.

Then you may want to consider a career in academia. You have more vacation and free time that most jobs, and in theory you have some say in what you dedicate your time to. If you work for a company you'll need to commit to whatever your boss feels you should commit to that day.

But maybe you need to stop thinking about this stuff and gain a broader perspective. Get a job if you don't have one already to at least get a sense of what you don't want to do.
 
  • #10
DrDoom said:
As for what I want to do for the next 60+ years or what I would do with unlimited resources, I would be lying if I didn't say sipping Martinis on my yacht while studying human mating rituals. But seriously, I have no idea, I would probably do what I'm doing now, being very confused and reading a bit of everything without being able to commit to one thing. Maybe I should just get into the Chinese shoe manufacture video designing business.

As someone who was in your shoes, I can guarantee you you're not going to figure it out by just chugging along. I was fortunate because I lucked into a really well paying job right after school that also gave me a lot of freedom to travel and get drunk and try to sleep around. It was only after doing that for a while that I realized it's not that great and I wanted to do something else. But I could have never learned that lesson without having actually been through it myself.

For you, I think I'd just recommend getting a degree in whatever and then going to do some mindless job like teach english in a foreign country. You'll probably get laid more and it'll give you a good chance to think about what you actually want to do. It seems like what you need right now more than anything is distance to gain perspective. If after that you still can't think of anything, then maybe you were just never meant to do anything that great, and just go ahead and settle to being whatever pays your bills. Your parents may not think this is the best plan ever, but in the end it's your life to live.
 
  • #11
mal4mac said:
Hard, concentrated work geared exactly to the syllabus - stop reading all those history books!

I know this was made somewhat in jest, however, you should keep reading the history books. However, you also have to work very hard in subjects like mathematics. Without context and history, any subject becomes an empty shell.
victor.raum said:
What would you spend your time studying?

Yes, this is an excellent post. We can't all spend our lives doing exactly what we want, but this kind of mental exercise can help guide you toward the right choices.

In the end, though, you have to develop a connection between your interests and your self-discipline. Without focus, you will get absolutely nowhere in life.
 
  • #12
DrDoom said:
And yet I can't help shake the feeling that I might be making the wrong choice. For instance, at one point during my schooling, I had decided I wanted to study physics. But then I read some Dawkins's books on evolutionary biology and decided that was what I really wanted to study. Even thinking about it now, I kind of want to switch back and do that. I guess what I'm trying to say is that I find a lot of things interesting and I'm afraid that by picking one of them, I could have done better at another.

I will tell you what seems to be a secret -- you can spend the rest of your life studying whatever you want. You can look at school as 'training' for some job, or you can look at it as 'training your mind.' Learn how to learn. The subject is immaterial. Spend the rest of your life learning more. You don't have to be one-dimensional.
 
  • #13
Thanks guys. I think all your advice has given me some real insight, the confusion seems less hazy.
A quick follow up question though, let's say I do get my act together and shoot for academia, will my prior lack of motivation and low gpa (I'm ashamed to say it's hovering around a 2.0) prohibit me from a realistic run at this? Any personal stories of similar situations or steps on how to proceed would be greatly appreciated. Thanks again.
 
  • #14
ander said:
Then you may want to consider a career in academia.

Don't consider a career in academia. The jobs aren't there.

You have more vacation and free time that most jobs, and in theory you have some say in what you dedicate your time to.

This isn't true. There is an interesting Catch-22 in academia. In academia there is a lot of theoretical freedom to do whatever you want, but you'll only get a job if given theoretical freedom you work yourself to the bone.

If you work for a company you'll need to commit to whatever your boss feels you should commit to that day.

Again. Not necessary true. My boss is usually too busy to give me detailed instructions, so most of the time it's a general goal in which I get to figure out how to get to the goal.
 
  • #15
DrDoom said:
A quick follow up question though, let's say I do get my act together and shoot for academia, will my prior lack of motivation and low gpa (I'm ashamed to say it's hovering around a 2.0) prohibit me from a realistic run at this?

Unless you get it up to a 3.0, you aren't going to get admitted into graduate school, and even if you get admitted you will not survive. Also the jobs aren't there so even if you do everything right, you are likely to end up doing something else.

One thing that might help is to get a job. If you are forced to do something (even it's menial) that will help you focus.
 
  • #16
DrDoom said:
I have this idea that mathematicians and scientist wake up every morning excited to unravel the mysteries of the universe.

No. It's more frustration that the latest effort to unravel the mysteries of the universe just aren't working. You have brief moments of excitement, but it's mostly drugery and frustration.

It's impersonal as all the concepts are so abstract and the act of discovery is usually done in seclusion.

It's not. You are always chatting with other people to see what is going on.

Would a passion for it develop as I delved deeper in the subject?

No clue. Take a few courses. See if you like if. If yes, go with it. If no, try something else. Also passion is overrated. One thing that made me a lot happier was when I stopped looking for a perfect life and just settled for one that was good enough.
 
  • #17
twofish-quant said:
Don't consider a career in academia. The jobs aren't there.

We don't know what field the OP would be applying to, we don't know how strong his application will be, and we don't know what the market will be in 7+ years, so I think it's premature to say that "the jobs aren't there." If as you say he ends up working the private sector anyway, then he may as well try if that's what he wants to do. There are too many variables to just dismiss an entire career in one sentence.
 
  • #18
DrDoom said:
Thanks guys. I think all your advice has given me some real insight, the confusion seems less hazy.
A quick follow up question though, let's say I do get my act together and shoot for academia, will my prior lack of motivation and low gpa (I'm ashamed to say it's hovering around a 2.0) prohibit me from a realistic run at this? Any personal stories of similar situations or steps on how to proceed would be greatly appreciated. Thanks again.

There's only one way to find out. And make sure you don't base any important life decisions on the advice you get from strangers on the internet.
 
  • #19
ander said:
We don't know what field the OP would be applying to, we don't know how strong his application will be, and we don't know what the market will be in 7+ years, so I think it's premature to say that "the jobs aren't there."

The science academic job market hasn't changed much since 1970, and there is a long term structural imbalance that makes rapid change impossible without a massive change in spending priorities which shows no signs of happening.

I can predict the position of Jupiter in 12 years with very good precision, and predictions of the academic job market over the next decade aren't that much more difficult.

If as you say he ends up working the private sector anyway, then he may as well try if that's what he wants to do. There are too many variables to just dismiss an entire career in one sentence.

No there aren't that many variables, and most of the variables are pretty well bounded. Ph.D. production rate is pretty constant, and the number of job openings over the next ten years is also pretty predictable. You can imagine a "game changer" but you can list the possible game changers. The big one is Federal funding for science, and if that goes in an unexpected direction, then it's likely to go in direction that makes things worse.

And also, this is what I do for a living. I mean when I wrote my dissertation proposal, I'd hardly get very far saying "nope, too many variables, can't figure out anything." The other cool thing about physics is that sometimes you can come up with a five to ten line argument as to why something won't work. If you assume X, then you have things whizzing faster than light so that won't work.
 
  • #20
twofish-quant said:
No there aren't that many variables, and most of the variables are pretty well bounded. Ph.D. production rate is pretty constant, and the number of job openings over the next ten years is also pretty predictable. You can imagine a "game changer" but you can list the possible game changers.

So the rate is constant and the number of openings are predictable. How does this equate to there being no jobs whatsoever?
 
  • #21
ander said:
So the rate is constant and the number of openings are predictable. How does this equate to there being no jobs whatsoever?

I said that the jobs aren't there, and you should plan on not getting a position. If you get a Ph.D. in physics there is a 90% change that you will not get a tenure track position.

It's great to dream about winning the lottery, but it's foolish to make that a part of your future planning.
 
  • #22
twofish-quant said:
I said that the jobs aren't there, and you should plan on not getting a position. If you get a Ph.D. in physics there is a 90% change that you will not get a tenure track position.

It's great to dream about winning the lottery, but it's foolish to make that a part of your future planning.

I agree with twofish here, and with what he said about settling for a good enough life instead of aggravatingly trying to pick out the "best" one for you. That's probably the best way for you to have a mental burnout. Believe me, I'm speaking from first-hand experience. Also, if you look at various published employment statistics , you will discover data that roughly corroborates what twofish is trying to say. I think the best bet is to reconcile your passions with what will also pay the bills.

Personally, I had to learn the hard way that waking up and "unraveling the mysteries of the universe" sounds fantastic from a theoretical standpoint and evokes a sense of responsibility as a seeker of truth, but that goal, no matter how romanticized or elegant from reading Brian Green's work or others, is almost unachievable by today's standards. The truth is that we just don't live in under an early 20th century education system anymore and the harsh reality we must face is that as the world population becomes more massive, economies rely on us to produce goods and services in industry-type fields to meet those expectations. Not to mention the intense graduate school competition coming from Asia and Eastern Europe, places whose history and culture strongly emphasize hard work and getting ahead.

I'm going to recommend Software Engineering as a field that pays very well (starting salary $70k+ in SIlicon Valley with a BS) and also requires high-level logical thinking, akin to that of physics.

Here's also a good read I found, written by a Harvard PhD student, that suggests that if Einstein were a graduate student today, even he would likely end up dropping out, basically thanks to our spoiled economy and where the government's priorities lie.

We simply live in a different time

www.chem.harvard.edu/herschbach/Einstein_Student.pdf
 
Last edited:
  • #23
CyberShot said:
I'm going to recommend Software Engineering as a field that pays very well (starting salary $70k+ in SIlicon Valley with a BS) and also requires high-level logical thinking, akin to that of physics.

Here's also a good read I found, written by a Harvard PhD student, that suggests that if Einstein were a graduate student today, even he would likely end up dropping out, basically thanks to our spoiled economy and where the government's priorities lie.

We simply live in a different time

www.chem.harvard.edu/herschbach/Einstein_Student.pdf

Thanks for the link. Despite trying to rally for a more idealistic approach to the career-search, I have to admit that I long ago gave up on the dream of dedicating my life to discovering the mysteries of the life and the universe when I realized that academia isn't so different from any other job. Just draped in more romantic clothes. I'll defer to two-fish and CyberShot's comments here, since my experience is only second-hand, as a kid from an all-academic family.
 
  • #24
I don't think I'm going to have a problem with mental burnout, at least not yet. My problem is that I can't even muscle up the will power to get started. I've gone through life with an aversion towards hard work and so far it hasn't gotten me in any short term trouble I can't handle. But I'm now starting to realize it's going to be a huge problem to my long term. I don't know if it's the reward punishment system of grades, the constant parental nagging or fear of failure (fear of success?), but I can't seem to put in the effort I know I can. I mean I enjoy learning for the sake of learning, but as soon as it becomes a 'go to class, get good grades' task or even a 'sit at my desk do some math exercises' chore, I find myself avoiding it at all costs. My apologies if I come off as a bit whiny. If I need to just suck it up and stop bullgarbageting, tell me, be blunt. Maybe some harsh words from strangers on the internet is what I need.
 

Related to To keep a long story short, I'm confused.

1. What does "To keep a long story short" mean?

"To keep a long story short" is an expression used to summarize a story or situation briefly, usually because it is too long or complicated to explain in full detail.

2. Why would someone say "To keep a long story short"?

People may say "To keep a long story short" to save time, avoid rambling, or to emphasize the main point of their story without getting into unnecessary details.

3. Is "To keep a long story short" considered impolite?

No, it is not considered impolite. It is a common phrase used in casual conversations or when trying to convey a message concisely.

4. Can "To keep a long story short" be used in formal settings?

Yes, it can be used in formal settings, but it is more commonly used in informal situations. In formal settings, it is better to phrase the statement as "In summary" or "To summarize."

5. How long should the story be when using "To keep a long story short"?

The length of the story can vary, but it is typically used when the story is too long to explain in its entirety. It is up to the speaker's discretion to determine how much detail to include in the shortened version.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
799
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
3
Views
696
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
16
Views
618
Replies
22
Views
934
Replies
22
Views
1K
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
2
Replies
45
Views
4K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
4
Views
986
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
11
Views
1K
Back
Top