Understanding Integration by Parts in Quantum Field Theory

In summary, the conversation discusses the use of integration by parts in obtaining the Klein-Gordon equation from the free particle Lagrangian density. The derivative of the product of the field and its derivative results in two terms, one of which is replaced by the integration by parts substitution. This is justified by the assumption that the fields decay rapidly at infinity.
  • #1
looseleaf
24
1
Hello, I'm just starting Zee's QFT in a Nutshell, I'm a bit confused about what he means by "integate by parts under the d4x". Can someone explain what he means by this? I understand how to obtain the Klein-Gordon equation from the free particle Lagrangian density, but not sure why he invokes integration by parts.
Thanks!
Screen Shot 2019-03-22 at 7.57.24 PM.png
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2019-03-22 at 7.57.24 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2019-03-22 at 7.57.24 PM.png
    22 KB · Views: 714
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Well, you have a ##(\partial \varphi)(\partial \varphi)## term, but ##\varphi\partial ^2 \varphi## is more useful later.

Both arise from the derivative of ##(\varphi)(\partial \varphi)## and that should go to zero for large ##\phi##.
 
  • Like
Likes DarMM
  • #3
To expand on what @mfb said.

We have:
$$\partial_{\mu}\left(\phi\partial^{\mu}\phi\right) = \partial_{\mu}\phi\partial^{\mu}\phi + \phi\partial^{2}\phi$$
Under the integral:
$$\int{\partial_{\mu}\left(\phi\partial^{\mu}\phi\right)d^{4}x} = \int{\partial_{\mu}\phi\partial^{\mu}\phi \hspace{1pt} d^{4}x} + \int{\phi\partial^{2}\phi \hspace{1pt} d^{4}x}$$
So assuming the left-hand side vanishes we'd have:
$$\int{\partial_{\mu}\phi\partial^{\mu}\phi \hspace{1pt} d^{4}x} = - \int{\phi\partial^{2}\phi \hspace{1pt} d^{4}x}$$
which is exactly the replacement made in Zee.

Since the LHS term is just a surface term it should vanish if the fields decay rapidly. They do, but proving so is a good bit beyond a text like Zee. Basically you'd have to prove a randomly selected field decays at infinity with probability ##1##.
 
  • Informative
Likes mfb

1. What is integration by parts in Zee?

Integration by parts in Zee is a mathematical technique used to evaluate integrals involving products of functions. It is a method of integration that involves choosing one function to be differentiated and another function to be integrated.

2. How is integration by parts in Zee different from traditional integration by parts?

Integration by parts in Zee follows the same basic principles as traditional integration by parts, but it uses a specific set of rules and notation developed by physicist A. Zee. This notation is designed to make the integration process more efficient and easier to understand for scientists and mathematicians.

3. When should I use integration by parts in Zee?

Integration by parts in Zee is most useful when evaluating integrals involving products of functions that cannot be easily integrated using other methods, such as substitution or trigonometric identities. It is also helpful when dealing with integrals that involve logarithmic or exponential functions.

4. What are the steps for using integration by parts in Zee?

The steps for using integration by parts in Zee are as follows: 1) Identify the two functions in the integral that will be differentiated and integrated. 2) Use the Zee notation to rewrite the integral. 3) Apply the Zee integration by parts formula to evaluate the integral. 4) Simplify the result if possible.

5. Can integration by parts in Zee be used for definite integrals?

Yes, integration by parts in Zee can be used for definite integrals. The Zee notation and formula can be applied in the same way as for indefinite integrals, but the limits of integration must also be taken into account when evaluating the integral.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Physics
Replies
13
Views
759
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
5
Views
985
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top