- #1
jeremyfiennes
- 323
- 17
- TL;DR Summary
- The two seem contractory. How are they reconciled?
The GR predictions for the universe's size are those of fig.a. Whereas the Hubble expansion is exponential, fig.b. How are the two reconciled?
Where are you getting that figure from?jeremyfiennes said:The GR predictions for the universe's size are those of fig.a.
What "Hubble expansion" are you talking about? Where are you getting that figure from?jeremyfiennes said:the Hubble expansion is exponential
Need I point out that this means they are not valid references?jeremyfiennes said:I don't know. My memory doesn't go back that far.
General Relativity (GR) is a theory that describes how gravity works in the universe, while Hubble's Law is an observation that states the further away a galaxy is, the faster it appears to be moving away from us.
According to GR, the expansion of the universe is caused by the curvature of space-time due to the presence of matter and energy. This curvature causes objects to move away from each other, leading to the expansion of the universe.
Hubble's Law provides observational evidence for the expansion of the universe. It shows that galaxies are moving away from each other at a rate proportional to their distance, which supports the idea of an expanding universe.
Yes, they can. While GR and Hubble's Law may seem to contradict each other, they are actually complementary. GR provides the theoretical framework for understanding the expansion of the universe, while Hubble's Law provides observational evidence for this expansion.
The reconciliation of these two theories has greatly enhanced our understanding of the universe. It has allowed us to better explain the expansion of the universe and has led to the development of the Big Bang theory, which is currently the most widely accepted explanation for the origin and evolution of the universe.