Verify Stokes' Theorem for F across a paraboloid

In summary, Homework Equations state that Stokes' Theorem is ∫F*ds=∫∫scurl(F)*ds. Projecting the surface of the paraboloid z=9-x2-y2 onto the xy-plane yields (2x,2y,1) / sqrt(4x2+4y2+1), which simplifies to (2x,2y,1) / sqrt(4x2+4y2+1). The flux integral over the surface is given by \pm\iint_{(u,v)}-8x+12y-3\ dydx.
  • #1
jerzey101
15
0

Homework Statement


Verify Stokes' Theorem for F(x,y,z)=(3y,4z,-6x) where S is part of the paraboloid z=9-x2-y2 that lies above the xy-plane, oriented upward.


Homework Equations


Stokes' Theorem is ∫F*ds=∫∫scurl(F)*ds
Where curl(F)=∇*F


The Attempt at a Solution


I got curl(F)=(-4,6,-3)
then I'm not sure what to do. my notes say to parameterize s and then compute the normal vector n, then compute ∫∫curl(F)*n. I'm not sure how to parameterize z=9-x2-y2.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Since [itex]\hat n[/itex] is the outward normal unit vector, directed upwards, above the plane z=0, the [itex]\vec k[/itex] vector component must be positive. Hence: [itex]\phi (x,y,z)=x^2+y^2+z-9[/itex]

Now, to find [itex]\hat n[/itex], just use the formula:
[tex]\frac{∇\vec \phi}{|∇\vec \phi|}[/tex]
You have found [itex]∇\times \vec F=-4\hat i+6\hat j-3\hat k[/itex]
Now, all you have to do, is just project the surface S onto the x-y plane and find the area.
 
  • #3
So (2x,2y,1) / sqrt(4x2+4y2+1)

how do you go about simplifying this?
 
  • #4
jerzey101 said:
So (2x,2y,1) / sqrt(4x2+4y2+1)

how do you go about simplifying this?

You can't simplify the square root at this point. Just proceed by multiplying with Curl F and find the surface area.
 
  • #5
so -8x + 12y - 3 all over [itex]\sqrt{4x2+4y2+1}[\itex]
I'm sorry, I am so lost with this one.

And I am doing battle with the formatting. I don't get why it's not working
 
Last edited:
  • #6
jerzey101 said:
so -8x + 12y - 3 all over [itex]\sqrt{4x2+4y2+1}[/itex]
I'm sorry, I am so lost with this one.

And I am doing battle with the formatting. I don't get why it's not working

To close the itex tag, always use backslash \ instead of /

Your expression is correct. Now, project the surface to find the surface area.
 
  • #7
Meaning integrate it over the paraboloid?
 
  • #8
jerzey101 said:
Meaning integrate it over the paraboloid?

Read the last line of post #2.
 
  • #9
When you are calculating a flux integral over a surface ##S##$$
\iint_S \vec F\cdot d\vec S=\iint_S\vec F \cdot \hat n dS$$you parameterize the surface in convenient variables ##u## and ##v## (which may be just ##x## and ##y##)$$
\vec R = \vec R(u,v)$$The normal to the surface is ##\pm \vec R_u\times \vec R_v##, with the sign chosen to agree with the orientation. Then to get a unit normal you have$$
\hat n =\pm \frac{\vec R_u\times \vec R_v}{|\vec R_u\times\vec R_v|}$$The scalar ##dS\ ##is given by$$
dS=|\vec R_u\times \vec R_v|dudv$$When you put these in the formula for the flux integral you get$$
\iint_S \vec F\cdot d\vec S=\iint_S\vec F \cdot \hat n dS=
\pm\iint_{(u,v)}\vec F\cdot \frac{\vec R_u\times \vec R_v}{|\vec R_u\times\vec R_v|}
|\vec R_u\times \vec R_v|dudv
=\pm \iint_{(u,v)}\vec F\cdot \vec R_u\times \vec R_vdudv$$where the limits are for the region in the ##u-v## plane. Note that you never have to calculate ##|\vec R_u\times\vec R_v|##. In your problem what he means by parameterizing the surface is writing it as ##\vec R(x,y) = \langle x,y,9-x^2-y^2\rangle##. If you calculate ##\vec R_x\times \vec R_y## you will get ##\langle 2x,2y,1\rangle##, which happens to have ##z## positive so agrees with your orientation, and agrees with your gradient. You have calculated ##\nabla \times \vec F = \langle -4,6,-3\rangle##, which is the ##\vec F## to put in the formula above:$$
\iint_S \langle -4,6,-3\rangle\cdot d\vec S = +\iint_{(x,y)}\langle -4,6,-3\rangle\cdot
\langle 2x,2y,1\rangle dydx=\iint_{(x,y)}-8x+12y-3\ dydx$$where the ##x-y## limits are over the region in the ##xy\ ##plane. That is where ##z=0## and gives the region enclosed by ##x^2+y^2=9##. At this point, you might want to work the integral in polar coordinates.

Then, of course, you still have to work the other side of the Stokes Theorem equation and see you get the same answer.
 
  • #10
Thanks LCKurtz, that is similar to what we were doing in my class. I was getting confused by what sharks was doing.
 
  • #11
If you had continued from what my suggestion, you would have ended up with the same double integral:
[tex]\iint_{(x,y)}-8x+12y-3\ dydx[/tex]
But it's indeed easier for you to understand if you can relate directly to what you're doing in class.
 
  • #12
Ok I'm starting to get it. Thank sharks!
 

1. What is Stokes' Theorem?

Stokes' Theorem is a fundamental theorem in vector calculus that relates the surface integral of a vector field over a closed surface to the line integral of the same vector field around the boundary of the surface.

2. What is a paraboloid?

A paraboloid is a three-dimensional surface that is shaped like a bowl or a dish. It can be described as a surface generated by rotating a parabola around its axis.

3. How do you verify Stokes' Theorem for a paraboloid?

To verify Stokes' Theorem for a paraboloid, you need to first calculate the line integral of the vector field around the boundary of the paraboloid. Then, you need to calculate the surface integral of the same vector field over the paraboloid's surface. If these two values are equal, then Stokes' Theorem is verified for the paraboloid.

4. What is the significance of verifying Stokes' Theorem for a paraboloid?

Verifying Stokes' Theorem for a paraboloid allows us to apply this theorem to solve various problems in physics and engineering that involve vector fields. It also helps us to better understand the relationship between line integrals and surface integrals.

5. What are some real-world applications of Stokes' Theorem for a paraboloid?

Stokes' Theorem for a paraboloid is commonly used in fluid dynamics, electromagnetism, and other fields of physics and engineering. It allows us to calculate the flow of fluids through different surfaces and to analyze the behavior of electric and magnetic fields around curved surfaces.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
820
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
878
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top