Where is my mistake? (Pure rolling and center of mass)

In summary, the frequency of the motion of the cylinder is 1/(2π)*√(3k/2m), which is the same as the frequency of pure rolling.
  • #1
Eitan Levy
259
11

Homework Statement


A cylinder with a mass of M and radius R is attached to a spring with a constant of k. The attachment always stays the same as described in the picture. The cylinder is moved to the right and the released, and it rolls without slipping (pure rolling). What will be the frequency of its movement? ICM=0.5MR^2 and the center of mass is at the middle.
o16aB3h.png


Homework Equations


ma=F
Iα=Sum of torques.

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to the following.
first I think that the forces relevant are the forces applied by the spring and the friction from the floor. Then I wrote these equations:
MaCM=-kx+f where f is the friction.
ICMα=r1×F1+r2×F2=-0.5Rkx-Rf.

Then when I tried to say that a=αR (pure rolling) I get that f=0, which is not possible and gives a wrong answer.

Where is my mistake?

EDIT: From what I understand by reading the solution, the problem is that for some reason αR=a is incorrect but 1.5αR=a is correct. I have absolutely no idea why.
 

Attachments

  • o16aB3h.png
    o16aB3h.png
    5.9 KB · Views: 412
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hi,

One cause is that f appears with a + sign in the first and with a - sign in the second equation. Subtract them and you get f = 0.

Now for the physics:
What is the axis of rotation ? Where is the spring attached to the cylinder ?
 
  • #3
The next step with such questions, after drawing the FBD, is to be very clear about which directions of displacement, acceleration, force, and rotation are positive.
Looks like you have right as positive for linear motion. Which way are taking as positive for rotation? Is that consistent with your a=αR equation? (Looks ok, just checking.)

Eitan Levy said:
Then when I tried to say that a=αR (pure rolling) I get that f=0,
Is that necessarily wrong?

BvU said:
One cause is that f appears with a + sign in the first and with a - sign in the second equation. Subtract them and you get f = 0.
The signs look ok to me.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes BvU
  • #4
haruspex said:
The next step with such questions, after drawing the FBD, is to be very clear about which directions of displacement, acceleration, force, and rotation are positive.
Looks like you have right as positive for linear motion. Which way are taking as positive for rotation? Is that consistent with your a=αR equation? (Looks ok, just checking.)Is that necessarily wrong?The signs look ok to me.
I thought it was consistent. First of all I can't understand how is it possible for pure rolling to occur without friction. Also, if we assume that those equation are correct I get ω=√(k/m) while the answer is ω=√(3k/2m) so obviously something is wrong.
 
  • #5
I'll try to translate the question again.

A cylinder with a mass of M and radius R is attached to a spring with a constant of K. The attachment always stays the same as described in the picture (the distance between the center of the cylinder and the attachment is always R/2). We move the center of the cylinder to the right and release it. The cylinder rolls without slipping (pure rolling). What is the frequency of the motion? ICM=0.5MR^2, the center of mass is at the center of the cylinder.

The answer is f=1/(2π)*√(3k/2m).

From what I understand by reading the solution, the problem is that for some reason αR=a is incorrect but 1.5αR=a is correct. I have absolutely no idea why.
 
  • #6
Eitan Levy said:
I can't understand how is it possible for pure rolling to occur without friction
Rolling just means there is no relative motion between the points in contact.
Think of just the wall, spring and cylinder, no floor, no gravity. In fact, replace the spring by some arbitrary constant force pushing or pulling on the cylinder at some point.
If the force is applied at the centre of the cylinder, it won't rotate at all. The further away from the centre, the greater the rotation, but the linear acceleration stays the same.
At some point, the rotation is so great that parts of the cylinder, on the side away from where the force is applied, move the opposite way to the cylinder's centre.
At exactly the right distance (R/2), the point of the cylinder furthest from the applied force has no linear acceleration in the force direction.
 
Last edited:
  • #7
Eitan Levy said:
The answer is f=1/(2π)*√(3k/2m).

From what I understand by reading the solution, the problem is that for some reason αR=a is incorrect but 1.5αR=a is correct. I have absolutely no idea why.
That's not the answer I get. Please post the whole solution if you can.
 
  • #8
I have problem understanding how the attachment of the spring to the cylinder remains always at that point and at that angle, while the cylinder moves and rotates.

There must be some sort of patented mechanism which of course is not shown, right?
 
  • #9
Delta2 said:
I have problem understanding how the attachment of the spring to the cylinder remains always at that point and at that angle, while the cylinder moves and rotates.

There must be some sort of patented mechanism which of course is not shown, right?
Small angle approximation.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2

1. What is pure rolling?

Pure rolling is a motion where an object, such as a wheel or a ball, moves without slipping or sliding along a surface. This means that the point of contact between the object and the surface is always at rest, while the rest of the object is in motion.

2. How is pure rolling related to center of mass?

Pure rolling is related to center of mass because the point of contact between the object and the surface is also the point where the object's center of mass lies. This is important because it allows us to analyze the motion of an object by considering only its center of mass instead of its entire body.

3. What is the significance of center of mass in pure rolling?

The center of mass is significant in pure rolling because it is the point that experiences no net force, allowing the object to maintain a constant velocity without slipping or sliding. It also determines the direction of the object's motion and the point of contact with the surface.

4. How is pure rolling different from sliding?

Pure rolling is different from sliding because, in pure rolling, the point of contact between the object and the surface is stationary, while the rest of the object is in motion. In sliding, the entire object is in motion and there is no stationary point of contact with the surface.

5. What are some common mistakes when analyzing pure rolling and center of mass?

Some common mistakes when analyzing pure rolling and center of mass include not considering the point of contact between the object and the surface, neglecting the effects of friction, and not accurately calculating the direction and magnitude of the object's motion. It is important to carefully consider all forces acting on the object and to accurately calculate the center of mass in order to correctly analyze pure rolling motion.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
35
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
3
Replies
97
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
924
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
979
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
1K
Back
Top