Why does inflation lead to a smaller universe at 380000 years?

In summary: Inflation simply means that the universe is expanding as a function of time, so during the early part of its history the universe was smaller than it would have been without inflation. In summary, inflation means that the universe was much smaller at 380000 years after the big bang than we would predict from the Big Bang model alone. This difference in size is very small, but it does matter.
  • #1
Thorslog
2
0
Why does inflation mean that the universe was much smaller at 380000 years after the big bang than we would predict from the Big Bang model alone? What would we expect the two sizes to be?
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #2
Inflation simply means the universe is expanding as a function of time. Go backwards in time and it gets smaller.

Try a Google search to answer to the other question.
 
  • #3
Thorslog said:
Why does inflation mean that the universe was much smaller at 380000 years after the big bang than we would predict from the Big Bang model alone? What would we expect the two sizes to be?
Well, I don't know about predicting a different size, but a universe that has an early period of inflation definitely takes longer to expand from the same seed size to the same late-time size. Not much longer, but some.

The reason is that with the classical big bang, where the only energy density that matters at very early times is radiation, the expansion rate is slowing down dramatically early-on. So the picture is one where at early times things are very hot, very dense, and with an incredibly fast expansion rate that is rapidly slowing.

With inflation, the opposite is happening. The dominant energy density is a form of dark energy that causes a very rapidly-accelerated expansion. So at very, very early times, the rate of expansion was actually quite slow, and was sped up to a high rate of expansion later. Because the early expansion was actually slower, it takes more time under an inflationary model for the same seed to expand the same amount.

However, the difference in expansion time is basically a tiny fraction of a second, so for all intents and purposes it does not matter. But it is an interesting conceptual statement.
 
  • #4
Many thanks Chalnoth and mathman. Really what puzzled me was a sentence in one of Marcus Chown's books where he says that if inflation did occur then 380000 years after the Big Bang the universe would have been far smaller than if we assume expansion alone (with no inflation). I'm still not really sure what he means here.
 
  • #5
Inflation occurred around E-36 seconds after the big event, not 380000 years.
 
  • #6
380,000 years is when the CMb was released. I think Chown has it wrong. This is an image that's in my textbook and a in a lot of textbooks:
http://www.physicsoftheuniverse.com/images/bigbang_inflation.jpg
youll see that the casual patch is much smaller at the onset of inflation , once inflaiton ends you have the same sizes as in standard big bang cosmology.
 
  • #7
Thorslog said:
Really what puzzled me was a sentence in one of Marcus Chown's books where he says that if inflation did occur then 380000 years after the Big Bang the universe would have been far smaller than if we assume expansion alone (with no inflation). I'm still not really sure what he means here.

It sounds like a typo, if it said "if inflation had not occurred ..." that would make sense, the region would have been many orders of magnitude smaller. Or perhaps it's the other way round, because of inflation, the material from which we receive the CMBR was much smaller (pre-inflation) than it would have been without inflation.
 
  • #8
mathman said:
Inflation simply means the universe is expanding as a function of time. Go backwards in time and it gets smaller.
That's not right. Inflation refers to a very specific kind of expansion, namely one that is exponential (accelerating), that occurred early on the history of the universe (prior to BBN and CMB.)
 
  • #9
During inflation, the Hubble scale barely grows (during de Sitter expansion, i.e. a CC, it does not grow at all.) So the Hubble scale, which marks the boundary of the observable universe, is roughly the about same just after inflation as it was just before. Had the universe otherwise been expanding through a radiation dominated epoch instead of inflating, the Hubble scale would have been growing. So, I think the key point here is that Chown appears to be referring to size of the *observable* universe.
 

Related to Why does inflation lead to a smaller universe at 380000 years?

1. Why does inflation occur in the first place?

Inflation is a period of rapid expansion in the early universe, which is thought to have occurred about 10^-36 seconds after the Big Bang. It is believed to be caused by a hypothetical field called the inflaton field, which is responsible for the rapid expansion of space.

2. How does inflation lead to a smaller universe at 380000 years?

During inflation, the universe expanded exponentially, causing the space between particles to increase at a faster rate than the speed of light. This rapid expansion stretched out the fabric of space, making it less dense and causing the universe to become larger. However, once inflation ended, the universe began to cool and the inflaton field decayed, causing the expansion to slow down. This eventually led to the formation of matter and the universe becoming smaller and denser.

3. What is the significance of the 380000 year mark?

The 380000 year mark is significant because it marks the end of the period known as the "dark ages" of the universe. This is when the universe became transparent, allowing light to travel freely for the first time. The light from this period, known as the cosmic microwave background radiation, is what we can observe today and provides evidence for the Big Bang theory.

4. How does inflation affect the overall structure of the universe?

Inflation is thought to have smoothed out irregularities in the early universe, creating a more uniform distribution of matter and energy. This is supported by observations of the cosmic microwave background radiation, which shows a nearly uniform temperature across the universe. Inflation also provides a mechanism for the formation of galaxies and other large-scale structures in the universe.

5. Is there any evidence for inflation theory?

While inflation is still a theoretical concept, there is strong evidence to support its existence. As mentioned before, the cosmic microwave background radiation provides one of the strongest pieces of evidence. Additionally, observations of the large-scale structure of the universe and the distribution of galaxies also support the predictions of inflation theory. However, more research and observations are needed to fully understand and confirm the role of inflation in the early universe.

Similar threads

  • Cosmology
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
37
Views
3K
  • Cosmology
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • Cosmology
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
259
Replies
7
Views
992
  • Cosmology
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
947
  • Cosmology
Replies
25
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top