Why is confinement such an issue for fusion and not fission?

In summary, confinement is a major issue in fusion due to the difficulty of getting two nuclei to fuse together and release more energy than it took to fuse them. This is not the case in fission, where the process is initiated by an extra neutron and does not require high temperatures and densities. Additionally, the power density in fission is not as high as in fusion, which contributes to the lower risk of a shockwave. Overall, the fundamental differences between fusion and fission reactions make confinement a bigger problem in the former.
  • #1
nonequilibrium
1,439
2
Hello,

Why is confinement a big problem in fusion and not in fission? Is it simply due to the fact that in fission, we're injecting a neutron that is neutral, and in fusion we're pushing together charged particles? If so, why is that facet not taken care of by reaching the critical ignition temperature and density? Is there perhaps another reason why confinement issues are so heavy?

Thank you.

EDIT: another source states it's because the particles are blown apart once one fusion has gone through, due to the shockwave; but what would be different in a fission process?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
mr. vodka said:
Is it simply due to the fact that in fission, we're injecting a neutron that is neutral, and in fusion we're pushing together charged particles?
Partly - the fissioning atoms are also ready to split and just need a small 'nudge' of an extra slow neutron. There are also lots of spare neutrons flying around from the fission process and you only need just over one neutron per splitting atom to hit another one to give a chain reaction.
There is a much higher barrier to forcing a couple of hydrogen atoms together and it isn't a chain reaction in the same sense.

If so, why is that facet not taken care of by reaching the critical ignition temperature and density?
It is - you need the confinement to reach the density.
another source states it's because the particles are blown apart once one fusion has gone through, due to the shockwave; but what would be different in a fission process?
Unless you are having a really bad day there shouldn't be much shockwave in a fission reactor. The power density in a fission process isn't that high - you can work out how much energy you get from each fission U atom and the proportion of fissioning atoms in the fuel.
 
  • #3
Thanks a lot :)
 
  • #4
Its a fundamental difference in the two reactions. Heavy nuclei, such as Uranium, have already been fused together from hydrogen and other elements in stars, but they are so heavy that they are unstable due to the repulsive positive force of all those protons. (90+) This is why they are already radioactive. Similar to how providing a spark will cause a chain reaction in gasoline, providing a neutron or two will start a chain reaction in fissionable materials.

Fusing two nuclei together is much more difficult because we have to do what a star normally does and make two nuclei that repel each other get close enough to fuse. The problem isn't simply getting nuclei to fuse, but to get them to do it in a manner that will release more energy than it took to get them to fuse together in the first place. There are so many ways to lose energy while trying to do this that we have yet to overcome it.

Check out fusion power on wikipedia, it explains the issues and has links to other useful sites.
 

1. Why is confinement necessary for fusion to occur?

Confinement is necessary for fusion to occur because it involves bringing together atomic nuclei at extremely high temperatures and pressures, which can only be achieved through confinement. This allows the nuclei to overcome their natural repulsion and fuse together, releasing large amounts of energy.

2. What makes confinement more challenging for fusion compared to fission?

Fusion is more challenging to confine compared to fission because it requires much higher temperatures and pressures. In fusion, the nuclei must overcome their repulsion and fuse together, while in fission, the nuclei are naturally unstable and split apart on their own. This requires different types of confinement techniques and materials.

3. Can we use the same confinement techniques for both fusion and fission reactions?

No, the confinement techniques used for fusion and fission reactions are different. Fusion requires higher temperatures and pressures, so techniques such as magnetic or inertial confinement are used. Fission, on the other hand, can be achieved at lower temperatures and pressures, so techniques such as nuclear reactors and nuclear bombs are used.

4. How does confinement affect the efficiency of fusion and fission reactions?

The efficiency of fusion and fission reactions is highly dependent on the level and quality of confinement. In fusion, if the confinement is not strong enough, the reaction can fizzle out and not produce enough energy. In fission, if the confinement is too strong, it can lead to an uncontrolled chain reaction, resulting in a nuclear explosion.

5. What are the main challenges in achieving successful confinement for fusion reactions?

One of the main challenges in achieving successful confinement for fusion reactions is the extreme temperatures and pressures involved. These conditions can cause the confinement materials to break down or melt, making it difficult to maintain the reaction. Another challenge is the cost and complexity of building and maintaining the necessary confinement devices, such as tokamaks or laser-based inertial confinement systems.

Similar threads

  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
755
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
12
Views
10K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
10
Views
15K
  • Nuclear Engineering
2
Replies
46
Views
12K
Back
Top