Why is Deuterium fusion so much easier than Hydrogen fusion?

In summary, the discussion on the Physics Forums thread revolves around the different temperature requirements for two fusion reactions involving hydrogen. The first reaction, H+H->D+e+, requires a temperature of >10,000,000 K while the second reaction, H+D->3He, only requires about 1,000,000 K. The reason for this difference is that the presence of a neutron in the second reaction affects the strong force, making it easier for the nuclei to overcome their positive charge repulsion and fuse together. The addition of the neutron also creates a deeper potential well, making the resulting He-3 state more stable. This difference in temperature requirements results in varying rates of fusion reactions, with pD at 107 K
  • #1
Buzz Bloom
Gold Member
2,519
467
This question occurred to me as a result of the discussion in the thread
Apparently
(1) H+H->D+e+
requires a temperature of >10,000,000 K
while
(2) H+D->3He requires only about 1,000,000 K.
I confess that the references for these temperatures are not high quality, but they are the best i could find.
Ref (1)
The threshold temperature for hydrogen fusion, sometimes referred to as the proton-proton chain, is 10-14 million K (Kelvin).
http://www.answers.com/Q/What_temperature_is_required_for_hydrogen_fusion
Ref (2)
Deuterium is the most easily fused nucleus available to accreting protostars,[1] and such fusion in the center of protostars can proceed when temperatures exceed 10^6 K.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deuterium_fusion

The role of a high temperature is to give the interacting nuclei sufficient energy/momentum that that they can overcome their positive charge repulsion to approach each other close enough for the strong force to have it's effect to complete the process of combining them together. What is puzzling is that the repulsive force is the same for (1) and (2).

My question is: Why does the presence of the neutron in D influence the strong force so much that only about 1/10 of the energy/momentum of the pair of interacting nuclei sufficient to allow for the fusion to happen?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I think it's just the matter of whether there is or isn't a need for a weak interaction to occur.

In the first case, once the parent nuclei are momentarily joined together, one of the protons must almost immediately undergo a beta plus decay into a neutron for the daughter nucleus to remain stable. The probability of such decay is low, so most p-p collisions end up in the two protons flying apart ag.

Higher temperature simply means that the rate of collisions goes up sufficiently, so that the number of beta plus decays occurring is significant despite low individual probability.

In the second case, once the electric potential barrier is broken and the two nuclei join, they tend to stay joined.
 
  • Like
Likes DrSteve
  • #3
Bandersnatch said:
In the first case, once the parent nuclei are momentarily joined together, one of the protons must almost immediately undergo a beta plus decay into a neutron for the daughter nucleus to remain stable. The probability of such decay is low, so most p-p collisions end up in the two protons flying apart ag.
To put this slightly differently, the diproton state is unstable and quickly disintegrates back into two protons. Had the diproton state been stable to disintegration, there would have been plenty of time for undergoing the beta decay, but as it is only a tiny fraction of diprotons actually have time to decay via beta decay to deuterium.
Buzz Bloom said:
Why does the presence of the neutron in D influence the strong force so much that only about 1/10 of the energy/momentum of the pair of interacting nuclei sufficient to allow for the fusion to happen?
The neutron provides a deeper potential well, enough to make the He-3 state stable against spontaneous separation of the charged protons.
 
  • Like
Likes Buzz Bloom
  • #4
Orodruin said:
The neutron provides a deeper potential well, enough to make the He-3 state stable against spontaneous separation of the charged protons.

Can you elaborate a bit? How does that relate back to the temperature? My first thought was that the addition of the neutron meant that the strength of the strong force was higher at a given distance, so the incoming proton didn't have to get as close in order to fuse. However, since this is the quantum scale, I know things are never that simple.
 
  • #5
The volume of a nucleus is roughly proportional to its mass number, He-3 has a larger nucleus than He-2 would have. A larger nucleus means the lowest energy states have a lower energy. In He-3 you have two protons and one neutron in a low-energetic state, while in He-2 you have two protons with a higher energy. Too high to be bound. To get a reaction, you need the weak interaction, and that makes the reaction very unlikely.Both fusion reactions happen at both temperatures, but the rates are different by many orders of magnitude.
pp at 106 K is negligible.
pD at 106 K is important -fast enough to support a small star.

pp at 107 K is important - fast enough to support a larger star.
pD at 107 K is extremely fast - so fast that deuterium nuclei just survive a few seconds.
 
  • Like
Likes Buzz Bloom and Drakkith

1. Why is Deuterium fusion considered easier than Hydrogen fusion?

Deuterium fusion is considered easier because deuterium, or heavy hydrogen, has one additional neutron compared to regular hydrogen. This extra neutron helps stabilize the nucleus and makes it easier for the nuclei to come together and fuse.

2. How does the extra neutron in Deuterium make fusion easier?

The extra neutron in Deuterium creates a stronger nuclear force between the two nuclei, making it easier for them to overcome their repulsive forces and fuse together.

3. Is Deuterium fusion more efficient than Hydrogen fusion?

Yes, Deuterium fusion is more efficient because it requires less energy to bring the nuclei together due to the extra neutron in Deuterium. This results in a higher success rate of fusion reactions.

4. Are there any downsides to using Deuterium fusion over Hydrogen fusion?

One downside to Deuterium fusion is that Deuterium is less abundant compared to regular Hydrogen. This means that Deuterium fusion reactors would require a larger supply of Deuterium, which could be more expensive to obtain.

5. Can Deuterium fusion be used to generate clean energy?

Yes, Deuterium fusion can be used to generate clean energy as it produces minimal waste products and does not emit harmful greenhouse gases. However, current technology is not yet advanced enough to harness Deuterium fusion for widespread energy production.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
6K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
6K
Back
Top