Why people float inside free falling airplane

In summary, the conversation discussed the concept of weightlessness in airplanes falling freely under gravity. It was mentioned that weightlessness occurs due to the lack of normal reaction between the floor and the person inside the plane. The reason for the relative separation between the floor and feet to increase was also questioned, with a possible explanation being the difference in initial velocity before free fall. The conversation also touched upon the use of a G meter on modern aircraft to measure and record the force of gravity during acrobatic maneuvers.
  • #1
hackhard
183
15
in science shows , an airplane made to fall freely under gravity has its passenger floating in mid air
i understand weightlessness is due to 0 normal reaction by floor on person
but since both passenger and plane have same aceleration due to gravity
what might be reason for relative separation bet floor and feet to increase.?
is this due to diff in initial velocity before free fall?
 
  • Like
Likes jerromyjon
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
hackhard said:
but since both passenger and plane have same aceleration due to gravity
Here you assume that the plane in the videos goes to exactly 1g downwards, and never slightly above.

hackhard said:
what might be reason for relative separation bet floor and feet to increase.?
is this due to diff in initial velocity before free fall?
Why would there be a difference in initial velocity, if you just sit in your seat? However, once in free fall, even small forces will cause you to drift around. Elastic objects that were compressed by the normal force, would restitute and "jump up" from the surface.
 
  • Like
Likes jerromyjon
  • #3
hackhard said:
since both passenger and plane have same aceleration due to gravity
The plane has air resistance, while the person inside is isolated from air resistance. But then the plane also has an engine, so it can dive faster than free fall... making sense yet?
 
  • #4
hackhard said:
in science shows , an airplane made to fall freely under gravity has its passenger floating in mid air
i understand weightlessness is due to 0 normal reaction by floor on person
but since both passenger and plane have same aceleration due to gravity
what might be reason for relative separation bet floor and feet to increase.?
is this due to diff in initial velocity before free fall?
Consider this: You have a spring standing upright on a surface. You compress it, and then suddenly release it. The spring suddenly decompresses and jumps a bit into the air. Now consider someone standing in a gravity field. Gravity is pulling down on him and slightly compresssing him, His muscles are exerting forces to keep his body from collapsing, etc. If you suddenly remove the gravity, the compression relaxes and the muscles are suddenly pushing against a downward force that is no longer there. The reaction is going to be the same as when you released the pressure on the spring. He will push away from the floor and drift.
 
  • Like
Likes jerromyjon
  • #5
hackhard said:
... an airplane made to fall freely under gravity has its passenger floating in mid air ...
Lol, take a ride in the "vomit comet" ...[COLOR=#black]..[/COLOR]:oldruck:
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes jerromyjon
  • #6
Also, the PIC (pilot in command), has a very sensitive G meter, prominently displayed in front of him , and has practiced this vomit comet maneuver, to perfection, least all the unharnessed occupants, be thrown to the rear bulkhead, to be bloodied and broken.
 
  • Like
Likes jerromyjon
  • #7
..and any slight deviation from the ideal path causes...
...relative separation between floor and feet to increase.

Try throwing two balls to friend at the same time. Can you keep them in contact for the whole flight path?
 
  • #8
i think I've got it
 
  • Like
Likes jerromyjon
  • #9
Well, I guess you really have it!

But, just because I have to stick my oar in, perhaps this is something that has not been addressed yet. Some people seem to think, perhaps because they always see pictures of people "floating" in the middle of the airplane, that there must be some force moving you away from the sides of the airplane. There aren't. You still have the acceleration due to gravity, downwards, but now the airplane has that same acceleration so is not pressing on you. But if, at the beginning of this "weightlessness", you were near the floor of the airplane, during it, you will stay near the floor.
 
  • Like
Likes jerromyjon
  • #10
Quickbobo said:
has a very sensitive G meter, prominently displayed in front of him
I wonder if they still use the metal nut on a string... :biggrin:
 
  • Like
Likes jerromyjon
  • #11
berkeman said:
I wonder if they still use the metal nut on a string...
Not even close. Should you care to view, what a modern, not quite as sensitive, "recording G meter" looks like, you can go to the Aircraft Spruce and Specialty Company website, and get an idea. These units are FAA requirements for all prop driven aerobatic crafts, whether flow in airshows, or for private "yanking, and banking".. A number of modern crafts in this category, have wings of complex wooden structure, design stressed to 9 G's ( aircraft grade Stitka spruce, or and FAA approved substitute) w/ "rib stitched" modern, FAA approved, polyester fabric covering. If during a flight session or airshow display, the recording G meter shows at or above the structured limit, ALL wing inspection covers must be removed, and w/ a flashlight, and mirror, all the structural components, spars, spar attach points, ribs, rib attach points, rib stitching, wing bay wire bracing and attach points, etc., must be inspected, and an entry made in the airframe logbook. The craft can't be legally flow again, under FAA rules, until that entry is noted in the logbook, OR, the wings are rebuilt/ replaced, and the appropriate entry made in the logbook... Them's the FARS, and their written in someone's life's blood. At some airshows like Oshkosh, there's an FAA rep on site, to check recording G meters, after each session of practice, and display, or sometime before the next take off, where the rep will reset the meter. Pheeew, a bit long, but I thought you might care for a bit more depth. Bob
 
  • Like
Likes jerromyjon
  • #12
Quickbobo said:
If during a flight session or airshow display, the recording G meter shows at or above the structured limit,
Interesting stuff, thanks.

I just remember from about 35 years ago when my then-girlfriend was working with the monkeys that were going to fly on the Space Shuttle, she got to ride with them on the Vomit Comet. The investigators wanted to see how the monkeys would respond to being in zero-g. My girlfriend told me that they all laughed when the got on the plane and the pilots showed them what they used for their "meter" to track zero-g in the dives -- it was a metal nut suspended from the cockpit ceiling with a string. They said they just pushed into the dive until the string wasn't taut anymore, and kept the nut floating for the rest of the dive.

BTW, just like people, about half of the monkeys got sick on the flight. :smile:
 
  • #13
berkeman said:
it was a metal nut suspended from the cockpit ceiling
Now, don't get me wrong, the nut might still be there to this day. Aviation has a long history of providing redundancies to crucial systems, especially when specific precision maneuvers are concerned, the nut, may be, and would be a realistic, back up, w/ the PIC watching the gauge, and the Co-pie watches the nut, and the gauge from an angle sitting right seat. If he should note any discrepancy, it time for the G meter, to head for the shop, for re-calibration
 
  • #14
berkeman said:
BTW, just like people, about half of the monkeys got sick on the flight. :smile:
It's even more cruel to cats, when their righting reflex kicks in and they start spinning like crazy:

 
  • Like
Likes jerromyjon and 256bits
  • #15
Ouch, brutal...
 
  • Like
Likes jerromyjon
  • #16
A.T. said:
It's even more cruel to cats
They would get used to it eventually, typically, and stop trying to react? Or is it like getting dizzy when you spin, it always happens and you will get just as dizzy every time? Most of my cats have adapted not to use their claws when they are falling against a human, it hurt, we yell in pain, all but one will not dig their claws in except Penny just can't stop herself. Some start to use claws and then retract them, others will not use their claws at all and will slide to a controlled crash instead, but only when human injury would result, otherwise its "claws to the wall". I wonder if it is directly wired to their balance system... and they can't disallow their reaction.
 
  • #17
jerromyjon said:
I wonder if it is directly wired to their balance system... and they can't disallow their reaction.
Reflex usually means that it is involuntary. Not sure what exactly triggers it though.
 
  • #18
in vomit comet will it be possible to create art floating in air (the paint itself floats ) using spraying can etc
 
Last edited:
  • #19
hackhard said:
create art floating in air (the paint itself floats ) using spraying can etc
I would think the spray drops would be more coherent in the lack of gravity and the spray would be more uniform and more consistently follow the inverse square law of diffusion... the "spray" is projecting the paint with velocity, in a linear manner rather than a group being perturbed by gravity. Think of how a sneeze travels in zero G straight across as far as the room goes, where in 1G there is a maximum distance your snot could travel before 1G brings it to Earth...
 
  • #20
jerromyjon said:
spray drops would be more coherent in the lack of gravity and the spray would be more uniform
suppose paint tubes are used for a thickened flow
although it may be messy
 
  • #21
hackhard said:
suppose paint tubes are used for a thickened flow
Slow motion globular painting? You could set up a video closed circuit and the pilot could steer the paper to adjust where the paint hits...
 
  • #22
is there any such video on youtube of painting at 0 G
 
  • #23
hackhard said:
is there any such video on youtube of painting at 0 G
did you search? I selected your text "painting at 0 G", right clicked, search google, 3rd on my list is quite mesmerizing:
 
  • #24
jerromyjon said:
You could set up a video closed circuit and the pilot could steer the paper to adjust where the paint hits...
I was picturing the canvas being vertical at the front of the plane and the paint being "flung" from the rear towards the front. Not as in the video I linked has it horizontal and it appears they are using minimal gravity, because the paint globs are coming up out of the bottle and falling down onto the canvas.
 
  • #25
hackhard said:
is there any such video on youtube of painting at 0 G
You might want to get a load of OK Go's latest music video...
 
  • Like
Likes mfb and jerromyjon
  • #26
DaveC426913 said:
OK Go's latest music video...
Absolutely love it! Best new unique video since Jamiroquai - Virtual Insanity! "defied" gravity...
 
  • #27
Quickbobo said:
(lest) all the unharnessed occupants, be thrown to the rear bulkhead, to be bloodied and broken.
This made me imagine an "extreme vomit comet"... What is the longest plane that can perform a hammerhead stall? LOL!
Now add padding around the interior of the fuselage and trampolines front and rear...
And like I always say, throw down, when you "throw up" it goes everywhere, in zero G, "down" is the closest surface... and reflection becomes a more significant factor... some "spewed" paint splats might rebound off the canvas... like the paint balls, in the video that Dave posted, near the end. That was actual physics in that video? I'm going to watch it again :-p
 
Last edited:
  • #28
will it be possible to create 0g condition on Earth (lasting forever)
a "smaller" giant wheel whose axis is rotated by another "larger" giant wheel.
by varying angular velocity of the two such that vertical projection of resultant acceleration of the seat is always 1g down
 
  • #29
hackhard said:
will it be possible to create 0g condition wthout freefall
You either fall towards the greatest source primarily or you get away from it. There is no other known way.
 
  • #30
can freefall be made to continue forever in park rides
hackhard said:
will it be possible to create 0g condition on Earth (lasting forever)
a "smaller" giant wheel whose axis is rotated by another "larger" giant wheel.
by varying angular velocity of the two such that vertical projection of resultant acceleration of the seat is always 1g down
 
  • #31
hackhard said:
can freefall be made to continue forever in park rides
Only simulated by reducing gravity briefly. Most of rollercoaster rides are flipping, rocking, twisting, etc. of drawn out redirected use of gravity for propulsion.
 
  • #32
hackhard said:
will it be possible to create 0g condition on Earth (lasting forever)
a "smaller" giant wheel whose axis is rotated by another "larger" giant wheel.
by varying angular velocity of the two such that vertical projection of resultant acceleration of the seat is always 1g down
Set up a giant free fall elevator.

Free-fall calculator

A 500m elevator with a contained falling capsule would give you a mere 10s of zero-G, not including the deceleration.
You'd need another 90m to declerate at 2(+1)gs in 3.5 seconds.

If you wanted 30s of free-fall, the elevator would have to fall about 4.4km and you'd be doing over 1000km/h.
You'd need to endure 3gs for an additional 10s to decelerate to 0 over 1.4km.

No that would suck.
 
  • #33
hackhard said:
can freefall be made to continue forever in park rides
Would NASA waste money on jet fuel, if that was possible?
 
  • #34
hackhard said:
can freefall be made to continue forever in park rides
Actually there is another way... imagine you were launched into a hollow cavity in the center of a large solid body out in space in microgravity. You could oscillate through the center for quite some time. Oh, wow, that's the piece I've looking for, for something different entirely! :-p
 
  • #35
jerromyjon said:
Actually there is another way... imagine you were launched into a hollow cavity in the center of a large solid body out in space in microgravity. You could oscillate through the center for quite some time. Oh, wow, that's the piece I've looking for, for something different entirely!
:-p
If you were in orbit then you would certainly be in microgravity, yes.

But you'd need 20 million 'good for one ride' coupons. And the lineup wait time would out Disneyworld to shame.
 

Similar threads

Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
591
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Mechanics
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
24K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top