- #1
Joseph Wood
I am curious about a reverse wing sweep because it could be used on an aircraft for turning at high speeds at higher than Mach two.
FactChecker said:One that comes to mind in modern fighters is that the yaw stability is reduced.
You are right that you don't want too much stability because the plane will be slow to react. But that is mostly in the roll and pitch axes that are critical for maneuvering. I don't think that there is any benefit to having a low yaw stability margin (this is pushing the limits of my knowledge of the subject). Of course the plane must not be so unstable in any axis that the flight controls can not handle it. The Air Force will specify that the plane must have a certain minimal closed loop stability phase and gain margins. The margin allows for some safety, even with deterioration in the plane and controls, future modifications, and new weapons loaded.Borek said:I thought stability is the last thing you want in a modern fighter? I mean - aren't they designed to be unstable, as it allows fast maneuvering?
Just the bird I was thinking of.gleem said:Grumman X-29 tested this concept
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grumman_X-29
Noisy Rhysling said:Earlier concept.
Never flew.gleem said:Considering that Grumman need a computer to control the X-29 I wonder what the results of the test flight of the German prototype were.
A reverse wing sweep, also known as a forward swept wing, can potentially increase the speed of an aircraft above Mach 2 by reducing drag and improving maneuverability. However, it also comes with its own set of challenges and trade-offs.
The main advantage of a reverse wing sweep for supersonic flight is that it helps to delay the onset of shock waves, which can cause drag and reduce speed. This allows the aircraft to maintain higher speeds and maneuver more efficiently.
One drawback of a reverse wing sweep is that it can cause structural instability and flutter at high speeds. This is due to the increased bending and twisting forces on the wings. Additionally, the placement of engines and other components can be more difficult with a reverse wing sweep design.
A traditional swept wing is better suited for supersonic flight, as it has been extensively studied and optimized for high speeds. It also offers better stability and control. However, a reverse wing sweep may be more efficient for certain types of high-speed maneuvers.
While reverse wing sweep designs have been used in military aircraft, they have not yet been widely adopted for commercial aircraft. The complexities and challenges of this design make it less practical for large commercial planes. However, it may be more feasible for smaller, high-speed aircraft such as business jets and supersonic transports.