Would you choose pain over non-existence?

  • Thread starter Holocene
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Pain
In summary: If you are thinking about it, you are alive. Otherwise, you would be dead.In summary, I feel that it is pointless to try and be happy when you know you will eventually die.
  • #1
Holocene
237
0
Knowing what you know now, do you feel a painful existence is still better than never being born?

I'm torn on where I stand. In some ways, just experiencing a small part of the univesre, even painfully or briefly, might be a privilege compared to never existing at all.

But then again, we all die, and in the end we'll never even know we had consciousness, so why put yourself through the pain?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Holocene said:
But then again, we all die, and in the end we'll never even know we had consciousness, so why put yourself through the pain?

Because death is so everlasting while this precious life is so fleeting. Why wouldn't you want to experience experience?
 
  • #3
Holocene said:
But then again, we all die, and in the end we'll never even know we had consciousness, ...

Knowing that you will with a very final absolute certainty cease to exist no matter your experiences, gives one the only reason needed to live in the face of any stimuli.

If you conclude that you will die anyway and wish to save ones self from a certain sense impression, then you must also conclude that the act of living in a more 'agreeable' state is just as pointless.

Frankly, I would lament my life having a point. I am glad that my cognitive experience has no reason or rhyme.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
I would choose non-existence..
I don't feel that being conscious is a privilege at all, at least not if it's a painful experience and then death.
That's just pointless.
How can you appreciate any gift you are given if it does nothing but hurt?
 
  • #5
Hmm, how much pain? I always have a sore muscle, a stiff joint, an itch, something or other. In other words, life is not constant bliss and we accept that. It's hard to imagine being born in pain and spending a lifetime in that same constant pain because then, would we even know that we are in pain? It might just feel like gravity: normal.
 
  • #6
Its like becoming a masochist. Enjoy the pain. It means you are alive.

And, since we have no clue what death entails... we shouldn't speculate it to be "everlasting" or anything to that effect. It might be hell. It could be heaven. It could be a loop back to living again... we don't know... though many profess to know.
 
  • #7
It would depend on the pain, on a scale of 1-10, a pimple being a 1, or crippling non-stop pain being a 10.

Anything above a 5 non-stop, I would say I'd go with non-existence.
 
  • #8
I can not see how the 'amount of pain' should matter at all in such a decision. It is the same as saying, "Well just how happy are we talking here?".

The ability to realize ones own existence even for a short (or long for that matter) blindingly unpleasant amount of time is, for me anyway, far to important to wish it away for any reason; much less for the existence of unpleasant perception of external stimuli.

I would, however, have to reconsider if the choice involved a loss of higher cognition along with the pain.


Edit: My statements are made under the assumption that by "...non-existence?" you mean to take any notion of afterlife out of the bargain; choosing between consciousness and black-out, coma, or a pre-birth type state.
 
  • #9
One type of pain that would make life not worth living has to be the pain experienced upon being cast into a fire where we must live for eternity. Any father who would prescribe such a fate for his children is by definition, the most evil father ever to exist.

I’ll pray I never have children. That should take care of it!
 
  • #10
Evo said:
It would depend on the pain, on a scale of 1-10, a pimple being a 1, or crippling non-stop pain being a 10.

Anything above a 5 non-stop, I would say I'd go with non-existence.

Of course pain generates a pretty pessimistic attitude. And I can see that one would be tempted by such an attitude to simply throw in the towel and die.

But, not many, even people in great pain, have the guts or the determination to kill themselves in any instance. Most suicides are silent pleas for help. No one hears the plea until the person is on a bridge about to jump or goes and sits in a hospital parking lot and attempts to shoot their brains out. Each of these cases shows that they are willing to be stopped because, genetically, the body does not voluntarily go to its death... no matter what powers of reasoning you have, the reaction and reflex is... not to die.

But, let's say you are successful in ending your "pain" and your dead body is laying on the carpet in the living room... and the clinic or the doctor phones with the answer to ending the pain... what a waste of a treatment.

EDIT: Then there's the other half of pain. Why does it occur? Well, as a matter of fact you would be dead without the sensation of pain. It warns you of an imbalance or injury or condition that needs attention. So, if the pain continues and persists, there is a reason.. there is something wrong that is begging to be corrected... and there is an answer to every puzzlement such as cancer, neurological disfunction, etc... so, the pain is urging you to find help or help yourself fix what the problem is in your body. Its not like its some amorphic demon creating the pain. It is physical and it can be corrected. So, just do it.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
there's pain, and then there's PAIN. longlasting PAIN might make life undesirable.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Throughout the ages there have been slaves and prisoners and victims of atrocities and other horribles where if you had to hypotheticly trade places with them you'd say I'd just do myself in and get it over with but they usually didn't, even when they had reason to expect that they would die soon anyway. It's interesting how some people who have it so bad can persist while others who have it realtively good will kill themselves. I think people have a "will to live" value hardcoded in their wiring that overrides rational thought when the situation finally presents itself.
 
  • #13
baywax said:
It is physical and it can be corrected. So, just do it.
Not always, I know people that died in excrutiating pain and there was nothing that could be done, they were at the point that the intravenous morphine no longer worked. You just hoped that they would die sooner than later because there was no chance of recovery. That's just a cold hard fact, you can't always stop the pain, unless you are knocked out, but they won't keep you knocked out just for the pain.
 
  • #14
Landru said:
Throughout the ages there have been slaves and prisoners and victims of atrocities and other horribles where if you had to hypotheticly trade places with them you'd say I'd just do myself in and get it over with but they usually didn't, even when they had reason to expect that they would die soon anyway. It's interesting how some people who have it so bad can persist while others who have it realtively good will kill themselves. I think people have a "will to live" value hardcoded in their wiring that overrides rational thought when the situation finally presents itself.
The book "Man's search for meaning" by Viktor Frankl explores this topic.
 
  • #15
Evo said:
Not always, I know people that died in excrutiating pain and there was nothing that could be done, they were at the point that the intravenous morphine no longer worked. You just hoped that they would die sooner than later because there was no chance of recovery. That's just a cold hard fact, you can't always stop the pain, unless you are knocked out, but they won't keep you knocked out just for the pain.

There are medically induced comas for reasons such as this. Then again, the cure for cancer, so far, has been death, leaving nothing to host the tumour(s).

edit. This is not to say I am a neurologist with years of study concerning pain and how to manage it. There are specialists who can do that. There are also so many different individuals among humans and each one tolerates their own level of pain and deals with the pain in different ways. Having worked with neurologists and neurolinquists in the field of oncology I can only say that pain is a difficult phenomenon to control, from what I've seen and discussed with those specialists. One promising area of pain control is or was relaxation therapy. But, attitudes toward airy fairy ideas of relaxation often negate the benefits of mediation and relaxation. As I've said many times on this forum the relaxation therapy program I was involved with ran for the 5 year clinical trial and showed a remarkable 20 percent higher survival rate among cancer patients as compared to those who did not participate. If you want stats I'll do the research to find them.
 
Last edited:

Related to Would you choose pain over non-existence?

What is the concept behind choosing pain over non-existence?

The concept behind choosing pain over non-existence is based on the idea that experiencing pain is better than not existing at all. It suggests that the desire to live, even if it means experiencing pain, is stronger than the idea of not existing.

Why would someone choose pain over non-existence?

There are a variety of reasons why someone might choose pain over non-existence. Some may believe that pain is a necessary part of life and that it helps us grow and learn. Others may have a strong will to live and would rather experience pain than not exist at all. Additionally, some may view pain as temporary and believe that it will eventually pass.

Is choosing pain over non-existence a rational decision?

This is a difficult question to answer definitively. Some may argue that it is rational to want to continue living, even if it means experiencing pain, as it is a natural survival instinct. Others may argue that choosing pain over non-existence is not rational as it goes against the instinctual desire to avoid pain and suffering.

What are the potential consequences of choosing pain over non-existence?

The consequences of choosing pain over non-existence can vary greatly depending on the individual and their circumstances. Some may find that choosing to live through pain leads to personal growth and resilience, while others may struggle with ongoing physical or emotional suffering. It is important for individuals to carefully weigh the potential consequences before making a decision.

Is choosing pain over non-existence a common belief?

The belief of choosing pain over non-existence is not necessarily common, but it is a thought-provoking concept that has been explored in philosophical and ethical discussions. It is a personal belief that varies from individual to individual and can change over time based on experiences and circumstances.

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
66
Views
3K
Writing: Input Wanted Can extreme pain cause paralysis?
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
62
Views
11K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
67
Views
5K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
4
Views
695
  • General Discussion
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top