Has the Hawking-Penrose Debate Shaped Modern Physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter RJ Emery
  • Start date Start date
RJ Emery
Messages
114
Reaction score
6
In 1994, Stephen W. Hawking and Roger Penrose gave a series of lectures which culminated in a debate about how universal and applicable the theories of quantum mechanics and relativity are. (Their lectures and debate were published in book form in 1996 under the title The Nature of Space and Time, Hawking and Penrose, Princeton Univ. Press.)

Since that was more than a decade ago, I was wondering what advances or discoveries were made since then that might have changed their views or positions.

What now is the current thinking of mainstream physicists who work in these areas?

Have either Hawking or Penrose changed their minds? I do believe, for example, that Penrose has more or less stopped research on his twistor theory.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since then, Hawking has changed his mind about information and black holes.

This year, Hawking turns 65 amd Penrose 76.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top