Photoelectric Effect: Explaining Cutoff Potential

  • Thread starter Thread starter dmitrip
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Potential
dmitrip
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Cutoff potential?

hello, in the photoelectric effect what is the cutoff potential? the official definition in my textbook is that it is the "smallest potential difference sufficient to reduce the photo current to zero" you guys will probably laugh but that doesn't really make sense to me and I would really appreciate it if somebody could clarify it to me in simpler language.

thanks a lot.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If I remember correctly, one shines light on a piece of metal and, if the frequency is high enough, electrons come out of the metal and their currect can be detected. The electrons come out of the metal at point 'A' with some kinetic energy and they travel to the detection point 'B'. If you put a voltage (potential difference) between A and B you can slow the electrons down. At some point you will eventually get the electrons to stop altogether and there will be no current measured. You can use this type of experiement to measure the work function of the metal.
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Back
Top