Recent content by bedi
-
B
Graduate Construct an explicit isomorphism
$\Bbb{R}P^1$ bundle isomorphic to the Mobius bundle I'm trying to construct an explicit isomorphism from ##E = \{([x], v) : [x] ∈ \Bbb{R}P^1, v ∈ [x]\}## to ##T = [0, 1] × R/ ∼## where ##(0, t) ∼ (1, −t)##. I verified that ##\Bbb{R}P^1## is homeomorphic to ##\Bbb{S}^1## which is homeomorphic to...- bedi
- Thread
- Explicit Isomorphism
- Replies: 1
- Forum: Topology and Analysis
-
B
Have you tried GR by Hobson? Share your thoughts!
The best book you can ever find on GR is Gravitation by Wheeler but I am sure you have heard of it (in fact you might have read it).- bedi
- Post #2
- Forum: Science and Math Textbooks
-
B
Graduate Open sets and cartesian products
Yes, this is why I said R x {something} doesn't work. I think I should write these in latex, it may be the case that you think I wrote U as a set but it is the union operation.- bedi
- Post #10
- Forum: Topology and Analysis
-
B
Graduate Open sets and cartesian products
(1) A={{x: f(x)=-y^2>-1}x{y'<-1: y' is a real}}U{{x: f(x)=-y^2>-2}x{y'<-2: y' is a real}}U{{x: f(x)=-y^2>-sqrt2}x{y'<-sqrt2: y' is a real}}U... (2) is similar, I just substitute random real values for y.- bedi
- Post #8
- Forum: Topology and Analysis
-
B
Graduate Open sets and cartesian products
Actually you can ignore my last reply above. Alright so write {x:f(x)>y} instead. We know this is open because f is continuous. y is defined as an arbitrary real number such that y<sup f so that y<f(x) could make sense. And if we put y'<y we get an open subset of real numbers consisting of y'...- bedi
- Post #6
- Forum: Topology and Analysis
-
B
Graduate Open sets and cartesian products
But this doesn't contain those y's. If we add them manually to A will that change something? Edit: If f has a max, say f(D), then add (f^-1(D), y) to A. If not then there exists an f(x') such that f(x')>y so add (f^-1(x'), y) to A. What do you think?- bedi
- Post #4
- Forum: Topology and Analysis
-
B
Graduate Open sets and cartesian products
Let A=U_y {{f^-1(x):f(x)>y}x{y':y<maxf(R) is there is such a max and y'<y}}. Does that work?- bedi
- Post #3
- Forum: Topology and Analysis
-
B
Graduate Open sets and cartesian products
Let f be a continuous function from R to R and let A be a subset of R^2. Define A={(x,y): y<f(x)}. Can you express A as a cartesian product of two open sets? I tried RxU alpha_x where alpha_x = {y:y<f(x)}. But that didn't work, i need to change something about R.- bedi
- Thread
- Cartesian Sets
- Replies: 9
- Forum: Topology and Analysis
-
B
Graduate Is S a closed subset of ℝ^n if it is compact?
Of course I did not assume that S is closed. So it is wrong in general that if we subtract (complement) any type of set (closed, open, clopen) from an open set, in this case A, the result is open, yes?- bedi
- Post #7
- Forum: Topology and Analysis
-
B
Graduate Is S a closed subset of ℝ^n if it is compact?
Theorem: Let S be a compact subset of ℝ^n. Then S is closed. Before looking at the book I wanted to come up with my own solution so here is what I've thought so far: Fix a point x in S. Let Un V_n (union of V_n's...) be an open covering of S, where V_n=B(x;n). We know that there is a...- bedi
- Thread
- Closed Compact Sets
- Replies: 13
- Forum: Topology and Analysis
-
B
Radius of convergence and 2^1/2
Homework Statement Suppose c_n is the digit in the nth place of the decimal expansion of 2^1/2. Prove that the radius of convergence of \sum{c_n x^n} is equal to 1. Homework Equations The Attempt at a Solution What I want to show is that limsup |c_n|^1/n = 1. Clearly for any...- bedi
- Thread
- Convergence Radius Radius of convergence
- Replies: 1
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
B
Can the size of any E-class be either 9 or 99?
Alright, that can happen right? Why not?- bedi
- Post #14
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
B
Can the size of any E-class be either 9 or 99?
Thank you, you are so helpful!- bedi
- Post #12
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
B
Can the size of any E-class be either 9 or 99?
On the other hand, mfb asked that "if you want to define an equivalence relation where each class has 9 members, how many equivalence classes do you get?" and since equivalence classes are also a partition on A, we have to have 2^99/9 classes in this case, which is not possible. Correct?- bedi
- Post #10
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
B
Can the size of any E-class be either 9 or 99?
Yes I think this is an equivalence relation on A. And the equivalence classes are: [1]={{1}}, [2]={{2},{3}}, [3]={{3}}. Actually I'm not sure if an equivalence relation on any given set must say something about all the elements of the set. For instance in this eq. relation we do not have [4], is...- bedi
- Post #8
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help