berkeman's latest activity
-
berkeman reacted to PeroK's post in the thread I Quantum behaviour of an electron around a positively charged sphere with
Like.
How are you going to model a charged sphere in QM? If you replace the hydrogen nucleus with a greater positive charge, then the lowest... -
berkeman reacted to weirdoguy's post in the thread I Quantum behaviour of an electron around a positively charged sphere with
Like.
Why? Positively charged sphere is something way different than proton. Real world sphere would consist of milions of atoms itself! -
berkeman reacted to robphy's post in the thread Does it make sense to build new radio telescopes? with
Like.
https://public.nrao.edu/radio-astronomy/the-science-of-radio-astronomy/ How radio telescopes show us unseen galaxies | Natasha... -
berkeman replied to the thread It is an honor to be here with you.Not in this Introduction thread. That would be needed if he starts a thread in the technical forums. -
berkeman reacted to Alex A's post in the thread MCNP6 BURN Card Issue: Zero Burnup for Material in Fuel Assembly with
Like.
I'm assuming since you get answers both materials are on your MAT card. Can you show us what isn't working by renaming it to a .txt and... -
berkeman replied to the thread It is an honor to be here with you.This is the kind of claim that would need to be supported by links to mainstream journal articles or textbooks. If you want to discuss... -
berkeman replied to the thread Other Which branch of engineering is more physics heavy?.Say what? Lasers -- explain stimulated emission without using Physics. Semiconductors -- explain semiconductor action without... -
berkeman reacted to questions000's post in the thread Other Which branch of engineering is more physics heavy? with
Haha.
But these are devices not realy physics. I looked at the ECE curriculum and they teach some about these but just give the minimum...