Now we have a particle-antiparticle asymmetry problem.
But, if we define electron and neutrino as antiparticle, will there be a problem?
Original formula
Modified formula
Original formula
Modified formula
If the classification of electron and neutrino is changed to antiparticles, the...
Your argument(
) leads to:
\rho + \frac{{3P}}{{{c^2}}} = {\rho _{rad}} + \frac{{3(\frac{1}{3}{\rho _{rad}}{c^2})}}{{{c^2}}} = 2{\rho _{rad}}
Your argument leads to the claim that when matter and radiation have the same energy density ρ0, the radiation exerts twice the gravitational force than...
We know that mass density = energy density/c^2. The question is, when entering the expression (ρ+3P/c^2), which form is correct? When looking at the radiation term,
\rho + \frac{{3P}}{{{c^2}}} = {\rho _{rad}} + \frac{{3(\frac{1}{3}{\rho _{rad}}{c^2})}}{{{c^2}}} = 2{\rho _{rad}}
or
\rho +...
In the book(An Introduction to Modern Astrophysics - Bradley W. Carroll and Dale A.Ostile)
Pressure P = equivalent energy density of kinetic energy
P/c^2 = equivalent mass density of kinetic energy
Isn't the pressure P in the acceleration equation the equivalent energy density of kinetic energy?
Currently, dark energy is described as a being that exerts a negative pressure while having a positive energy density.
{\rho _\Lambda } + 3{P_\Lambda } = {\rho _\Lambda } + 3( - {\rho _\Lambda }) = - 2{\rho _\Lambda }
However, there seems to be a problem with the negative pressure assertion...