Recent content by Deeviant

  1. D

    Is the Universe's Expansion Rate Truly Accelerating?

    Thank you for your replies. It seems my general understanding of the matter is at least somewhat close to the currently accepted knowledge. I think my confusion comes from talk of the acceleration of the expansion, particularly in the idea of the "Big Rip". If the rate is constant and only the...
  2. D

    Is the Universe's Expansion Rate Truly Accelerating?

    It is well accepted that the universe is expanding at an increasing rate. Looking at the evidence, I certainly accept the universe is expanding as well, but is it expanding at an increasing rate? I also understand it as an expansion of fabric of space, no simply a trait of motion between...
  3. D

    Non constant accelleration equation(s)

    lol! And thanks guys.
  4. D

    Non constant accelleration equation(s)

    Hey guys, it's been awhile since I've been in the class room and I'm a bit fuzzy on non-constant acceleration problems. This actually started with a something of an amorous note sent to a lady friend, with the general idea that there is always a (small) gravitational force experienced between...
  5. D

    Does physics forbid such a device; a heat destroyer

    I already agreed I am not going to try to use a black-body pumped laser, but merely radiate it out as directionally as possible. Where is the 2nd law being broken?
  6. D

    Does physics forbid such a device; a heat destroyer

    Star Trek is "soft sci-fi", they can make up whatever they want, and they are not at all bound to our laws of physics. I am constraining myself to what is at least possible (hard sci-fi) because I want to get to the core of what sci-fi means to me: looking into our future and taking a best guess...
  7. D

    Does physics forbid such a device; a heat destroyer

    The point is not to create a infinitely small beam of destruction, it is to simply avoid a omni-directional profile that average black-body radiation would generate and act as a "here I am" beacon in space.
  8. D

    Does physics forbid such a device; a heat destroyer

    Yes, it wouldn't be coherent but it would at least be directional, somewhat controlled and far more efficient...
  9. D

    Does physics forbid such a device; a heat destroyer

    As far as my best research can dig up, matter/antimatter annihilation does indeed conserve momentum but not in the way in which you describe. Any particle/anti-particle pair will have the exact behavior you describe but photon's conserve momentum in the form of photon pairs traveling in equal...
  10. D

    Does physics forbid such a device; a heat destroyer

    You right, I redid the math with the relativistic kinetic equation. It would be 1503.3 megatons for a 1 kilogram at .9999C projectile and 128.9 megatons for a 1 kilogram at .99C. But that is only the KE. The actual amount of energy released could be more. For one, the projectile could be made...
  11. D

    Does physics forbid such a device; a heat destroyer

    I haven't, I'll take a look at The Gods Themselves, thanks.
  12. D

    Does physics forbid such a device; a heat destroyer

    A relativistic projectile would initiate a fusion reaction on contact. It would literally hit with the force of a hydrogen bomb... Your gravitation defense is an interesting angle though. I think the biggest problem I foresee is that most defensive systems seem to amount to a huge amount of of...
  13. D

    Does physics forbid such a device; a heat destroyer

    I would love to hear a physics abiding defense against a relativistic projective.
  14. D

    Does physics forbid such a device; a heat destroyer

    Right, because we have never heard of a laser before, that's totally crazy. And it would be foolish to even think a few thousand years of human advancement could yield a serviceable relativistic mass-driver, which funny enough is just about lowest tech "high-tech" weapon in common sci-fi use...
Back
Top