This is sort of SF in the sense that it's not scientifically accepted or reviewed.
The "idea" comes from other people and it is that a usually round light beam of a certain diameter, like 30-50-100-similar cm diameter, extends slowly and even stops midair. It's flat at the end.
Like a straight...
If you want really long lasting data use M-Disc.. It's a type of CD/DVD which don't use the classic painted reflective layer but a carbon layer.
Is advertised as 1000 years... Yes thousand. The military did stress tests with it and various other brands and stuff it is really that good.. It's...
OK here's the ver 2.0
The field is now continuous as is not only a beam but a full planar slice.
Now let's say that at the walls surface there's some penetration... Like 1 cm.
So now the disk of magnetic pole or whatever you want to call it is encompassing 1 cm of solid material while moving at...
Well not laser like but flashlight style.
So you're saying that a 11m long match's head , rotating at 300k rpm on a mount, isn't brushing against a wall at 345575 m/s ?
Work still has to be done...aka the wall's static particles are moving at 345575 m/s AGAINST the magnetic beam.
No ?
I mean you can have a magnet on a table and move particles through it with your hand OR pick up the magnet and move it over the particles... But in this design we keep everything...
Hi. I was browsing Wikipedia on a topic, went to magnetic bearings, etc etc...ended up on synchrotron radiation then the phrase about how a moving or accelerat/ing/ed particle passing through a magnetic field generates electromagnetic radiation.
Then I has a revelation.
How to get a particle...
I understand that, I guess my question is what the minimum scientific or metallurgically accepted value to declare that one is doped and the other is not? 20ppm, 5ppm?
At which point natural impurities are ruled out and deliberate doping is declared?
Something to do with new post Feynman formalisms...
On the page below there are 3 links that present it better than I can in this post.
http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=33838.0
Interesting stuff... anisotropic behavior in gravitational field anyone ? :woot:
Yeah I might be mixing the 2 a little bit cause when I first heard that notion ( nothing lasts forever, there's no perpetual motion) it was at a very small age, maybe 5, and it stuck with me in the sense that it was like the definition of unachievable... Like just the notion itself, that it...
I'm not going to read that cause it's above my pay grade(shhh-education).
I initially found out about the Josephson junction while browsing Wikipedia where it says :
" The Josephson effect is the phenomenon ofsupercurrent—i.e. a current that flows indefinitely long without any voltage...
Well it seems like one of those "Did you know that..." type thingy... As I see it it's motion, of electricity, without any end in sight... Sure it's not scalable or of any real use but it is like a very rare thing which laughs in the face of the notion that there is no such thing as a perpetual...