Recent content by godzenon

You're right, i got what i wanted out of this thread and I'm grateful, i realize people don't like my theories because they're dumb etc.

Well time dilation makes things move slower, the LHC and the proton are not relative, so it doesn't apply, but for single objects like the proton it would (normally) if you have proton and an electron a meter apart with the same velocity moving relatively at 99.9999999% the speed of light...

Hm thanks that answers my main question, and i'll probably ask the Iron rod question in a different section, I guess i should've assumed it was proportional because that makes sense, i should have worded it better when i first wrote it I'm willing to bet that there's a difference depending on...

Couldn't you say that's the same thing in a matter of speaking? Yeah but that should not nearly be as effective as a damper when compared to the increase in magnetic force caused by Lorentz force so it's like if the protons are moving 99% the speed of light compared to the magnets accelerating...

Thanks for reading this As protons go faster and fast in the LHC they have a greater angular momentum (that's not at all the right term) to go around in circles faster and faster as they reach near the speed of light that greater inward attraction towards the magnet to rotate around in the LHC...

by lab frame, you mean for an outside observer i assume nothing should change relatively so i don't see why there would be an attraction force, when we don't see an attraction force at low speeds the link i gave suggested that moving charges which are not relative have different forces acting...

ok, what about colliding protons?

I meant to say fast moving "objects" in the title, my bad... my title kind of sucks https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relativistic_electromagnetism#The_field_of_a_moving_point_charge That section is basically what my questions are about. I want to know generally about the overall forces. Two...