Insights Blog
-- Browse All Articles --
Physics Articles
Physics Tutorials
Physics Guides
Physics FAQ
Math Articles
Math Tutorials
Math Guides
Math FAQ
Education Articles
Education Guides
Bio/Chem Articles
Technology Guides
Computer Science Tutorials
Forums
Trending
Log in
Register
What's new
Latest activity
Register
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
More options
Style variation
System
Light
Dark
Contact us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
javisot's latest activity
J
javisot
reacted to
Greg Bernhardt's post
in the thread
Insights
Why Entangled Photon-Polarization Qubits Violate Bell’s Inequality
with
Like
.
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem...
Sep 29, 2025
J
javisot
reacted to
RUTA's post
in the thread
I
Question about discussions around quantum interpretations
with
Like
.
Here is a 2023 paper relevant to this thread Many-Worlds: Why Is It Not the Consensus? Abstract: In this paper, I argue that the...
Sep 28, 2025
J
javisot
reacted to
Filip Larsen's post
in the thread
Is AI hype?
with
Like
.
Yes, for base models, i.e. for "pure" LLM that do no fact checking, but as noted in the paper it is in principle easy to establish fact...
Sep 24, 2025
J
javisot
replied to the thread
Is AI hype?
.
I highlight two paragraphs from this interesting paper: "Hallucinations are inevitable only for base models. Many have argued that...
Sep 24, 2025
J
javisot
reacted to
Greg Bernhardt's post
in the thread
Is AI hype?
with
Like
.
Hallucinations are a mathematical inevitability and impossible to reduce to zero according to their own paper...
Sep 24, 2025
J
javisot
reacted to
Herman Trivilino's post
in the thread
I
Is there a bad intuition or bad explanation in quantum entanglement?
with
Like
.
My point is that in the phrase "objectively true" the adverb objectively adds no meaning to the phrase. The entire concept of truth is...
Sep 23, 2025
J
javisot
replied to the thread
I
Is there a bad intuition or bad explanation in quantum entanglement?
.
I've never heard those terms used in physics. Perhaps "physical reality" was once used as the regime of reality that can be described by...
Sep 23, 2025
J
javisot
reacted to
Peter Morgan's post
in the thread
I
A very interesting paper on orthodox quantum mechanics
with
Like
.
Certainly QFT as we have it is effective to an extraordinary degree and I have no problem with discussing asymptotic states, but I think...
Sep 22, 2025
J
javisot
replied to the thread
I
A very interesting paper on orthodox quantum mechanics
.
A very interesting article. I've been wondering about this for a while. Personally, I've noticed that physicists sometimes talk about...
Sep 22, 2025
J
javisot
reacted to
A. Neumaier's post
in the thread
I
A very interesting paper on orthodox quantum mechanics
with
Like
.
Beck, G. (2025). How to be an orthodox quantum mechanic. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.20597 From the abstract: From the conclusion:
Sep 22, 2025
J
javisot
reacted to
Jaime Rudas's post
in the thread
B
Rutgers finds a transparent Einstein Cross - apparently a dark matter "halo".
with
Like
.
I think you underestimate the enormous retrospective adaptability that these "theories" have always demonstrated.
Sep 22, 2025
J
javisot
replied to the thread
I
Question about discussions around quantum interpretations
.
Having a good map helps us explore the territory more effectively, but we shouldn't confuse the map with the territory. Both are...
Sep 18, 2025
J
javisot
reacted to
A. Neumaier's post
in the thread
I
Question about discussions around quantum interpretations
with
Like
.
Good theories (of which good models are anintegral part) have a high explanatory power, revealed by appropriate computations (that...
Sep 18, 2025
J
javisot
reacted to
Demystifier's post
in the thread
I
Question about discussions around quantum interpretations
with
Like
.
You mean a local hidden-variable theory cannot reproduce all of QM's predictions. A non-local hidden-variable theory can.
Sep 17, 2025
J
javisot
reacted to
A. Neumaier's post
in the thread
I
Question about discussions around quantum interpretations
with
Like
.
Yes. The evolution of the radiated system in a homogeneous medium is generally assumed to be unitary, with an effective dynamics...
Sep 17, 2025
Forums
Back
Top