Recent content by jensjakob

  1. J

    San Onofre steam generator tubes leaking - why?

    "The company has received overseas orders for 31 units, mainly from North America and Europe. " Hmmm - could be interesting to track those and compare corrosion.
  2. J

    San Onofre steam generator tubes leaking - why?

    Hi, San Onofre, menioned durring the Japan crisis, is leaking and corroding pipes fast: http://www.scpr.org/blogs/news/2012/03/22/5205/san-onofre-reactors-down-indefinitely/ http://sciencedude.ocregister.com/2012/02/02/nuclear-leak-damage-to-both-reactor-units/167503/ What is going on- any...
  3. J

    Japan Earthquake: Nuclear Plants at Fukushima Daiichi

    Pictures from when the Tsunami hit Fukushima: http://www.bt.dk/udland/her-rammer-tsunamien-atom-kraftvaerket A lot of new pictures I haven't seen - shows the extent of the flooding
  4. J

    Japan Earthquake: Nuclear Plants at Fukushima Daiichi

    Discovery has released a documentary, some of it can be seen here: http://ing.dk/artikel/118964-foelg-med-brandmaendene-ind-paa-fukushima-vaerket
  5. J

    Japan Earthquake: Nuclear Plants at Fukushima Daiichi

    130 Sv/h in no 2 torus - that is quite a lot? How can that be?
  6. J

    Japan Earthquake: Nuclear Plants at Fukushima Daiichi

    http://translate.google.dk/translate?js=n&prev=_t&hl=da&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&sl=da&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fing.dk%2Fartikel%2F118380-tepco-vil-fjerne-braendselsstave-med-kaempekranerhttp://www.asahi.com/english/TKY201104130196.html
  7. J

    Japan Earthquake: Nuclear Plants at Fukushima Daiichi

    <sarcasm>Wouldnt TEPCO report that?</sarcasm> Seriously - TEPCO has no possible way to state anything about the effect of the quake, since they don't have access to large parts of the plant due to radiation. They can claim "Not identified any immediate damage in the areas that we can monitor"...
  8. J

    Japan Earthquake: Nuclear Plants at Fukushima Daiichi

    Meltdown? "The fuel rods remain nearly half exposed as the coolant water inside the reactor has not yet risen high enough" http://www3.nhk.or.jp/daily/english/07_01.html
  9. J

    Japan Earthquake: Nuclear Plants at Fukushima Daiichi

    You are right. I have been searching for that post - can remember that someone mentioned that Fukushima engineers had begun storing fuel rods at the equipment pool, due to overcapacity of spent fuel pool. But I haven't found the post yet. But I do know that is has been stated (benefit of a...
  10. J

    Japan Earthquake: Nuclear Plants at Fukushima Daiichi

    Fred, TCups Great analysis - spot on I think.
  11. J

    Japan Earthquake: Nuclear Plants at Fukushima Daiichi

    BINGO! You are quite good. Respect and kudos for your stamina
  12. J

    Japan Earthquake: Nuclear Plants at Fukushima Daiichi

    Great stuff - thank you very much. What I wonder about, is that drywell is pretty radiating in all 3, and in #1 the Torus is also quite hot. Why is the Torus so active in #1 but not in #2 and #3?
  13. J

    Japan Earthquake: Nuclear Plants at Fukushima Daiichi

    TEPCO recruiting "jumpers" to go into highly radiated areas: http://uk.reuters.com/article/2011/04/01/uk-japan-quake-jumpers-idUKTRE7302OH20110401 This is turning nasty...
  14. J

    Japan Earthquake: Nuclear Plants at Fukushima Daiichi

    This picture worries me: http://english.kyodonews.jp/photos/2011/04/82781.html If the military takes these precautions - why do we still see workers on the ground in lot less protection?
  15. J

    Japan Earthquake: Nuclear Plants at Fukushima Daiichi

    Propably not. If it were - I guess they wouldn't have released that clip. But it could look like it...
Back
Top