Recent content by kokolovehuh

  1. K

    Introduction To Loop Quantum Gravity

    Just a quick question. I thought formulation of loop structure was based on the idea using Giles's theorem and defining different colors via dimensions of solution to the connection's algebra. Here, the author says it's due to vibrations as in QFT. Thoughts?
  2. K

    What is ℝ? Understanding Real Numbers

    Aha, there we go. Thanks a lot pwsnafu for the verification! as well as others for your time generous reply.
  3. K

    What is ℝ? Understanding Real Numbers

    @micromass, @pwsnafu, I see what you are saying. Overall, you have convinced me {ℝ} is possible. But, The notation with curly bracket is directly defining the single element in this set as the real space which is essentially another set. I was simply saying there is no necessity to put real...
  4. K

    What is ℝ? Understanding Real Numbers

    Thanks bjunniii, you have a good point. However, let me rephrase my doubt. We want to use a notation to represent a set of all real number, say X. It is immediately apparent that x \in X \subseteq ℝ for some real number x. In this case, we are not not considering any stronger set, for...
  5. K

    What is ℝ? Understanding Real Numbers

    What is {ℝ}? Hi, Someone I know tried to convey me the meaning of {ℝ}, stating it represents a set of real numbers. But using notation, {ℝ}, is implying that the real space is (improperly) contained in a set, and I don't think this makes any logical sense. On the other hand, we can say {x...
  6. K

    Do baryons only decay via the weak force?

    I am not so sure all baryon decay weakly. First, consider the classical example of positive pions scattering with protons which can produce neutral lambdas. Then, for instance, it has been experimentally proven that such lambda can decay strongly b/c we can trace its track within reasonable...
  7. K

    Number of neutrons & stability?

    I think it's also possible to look at the quark content of the neutrons and proton; if they are really confined such that you have to pick one or the other using Pauli's exclusion principle, you can have different colors of quarks which validates the statement of how proton and neutron can...
  8. K

    D Meson Decay: Neutral D-Meson Branching Ratios

    mfb, it does make whole lot more sense now; thanks a lot btw Vanadium 50, (correct me if I'm wrong) you don't need a particle decay to be in CP eigenstate to conserve charge conjugation/parity in any non-weak interactions.
  9. K

    D Meson Decay: Neutral D-Meson Branching Ratios

    Vanadium 50, it's probably because of some CP conservation; so we have pions as products. This is why the intermediate photons are only virtual and we need quarks to be produced.
  10. K

    D Meson Decay: Neutral D-Meson Branching Ratios

    Yea, I see how this works like that. But as I mentioned before, since 'positive pion + negative pion' can be produced through two photons why wouldn't it be produced more often than the ones from weak interaction? Also a stupid question, when do you take the Vxx to be negative? Vxx = any...
  11. K

    D Meson Decay: Neutral D-Meson Branching Ratios

    Hi all, I have a question regarding to the branching ratio of neutral D-meson decay. Give three decays: 1. D --> negative kaon + positive pion 2. D --> positive pion + negative pion 3. D --> positive kaon + negative pion The one with highest branching ratio is 1. due to its non-cross...
  12. K

    Mu-neutrino & tau-neutrino mixing/scattering

    Hi all, I was wondering, is this scattering process even possible? Since we cannot mix the two neutrinos on one side due to lepton number conservation, we need to convert one of the neutrino to its anti-neutrino by crossing symmetry. To conserve tau&mu number we have: tau-neutrino + anti...
  13. K

    Does hamiltonian/energy eigenstate always exist?

    So you are implying all time-independent ones do? including the non-normalizable ones
  14. K

    Does hamiltonian/energy eigenstate always exist?

    Hi all, This may seem silly but...do energy eigenstates always exist in terms of wave functions themselves? To me, it seems they do because they always contain quantized energies. How about any hypothetical non-normalizeable wave functions? Thanks O.
Back
Top