I read somewhere "space was not completely homogenous (the same at every point). Instead, some areas were denser and hotter than others, and these dense regions could have collapsed into black holes." and I was wondering what does it exactly means?
Did space itself fall into becoming PBHs...
This study from Johns Hopkins University shows that even if we manage to nuke an asteroid and "destroy" it, it will have a core back, in almost 2 hours.
Nuking them was a bad idea before, but now seems worse.
More details here...
Can you give me some sources please? :)
My actual science resources are N.A.S.A.'s site (their youtube channels, and JPL's too) and Anton Petrov. A guy that makes videos about astronomy "news" and post the source of the research in the comments. Do you know any site or anything like this where...
yeah, I forgot to refer to it as a black hole, sorry.
I think this is what I tried to do. Because, as I mentioned before, I have low to 0 knowledge of quantum effects, I tried to make sense with the little that I knew.
really? It seems that I really have to dig more into it. I mean, it seemed...
First off, this is just an assumption. My knowledge of the field is extremely limited and I beg you to come and correct my mistakes, so I can learn.
So, I guess we all know how that space-time fabric is bended by gravity. When a star dies, all of the atoms are brought extremely close...
If I remember correctly, laser technology is not that powerful yet. I don't think it can cause any sort of damage to an asteroid. I have to mention that last time when I checked it was like a year ago. Some stuff may have changed.
Do you have any own idea, on a way to protect the Earth from a possible asteroid impact?
(You can not use technologies that are not invented yet, or imaginary. Those that can be invented in the next, let's say, 10 years, are allowed)
Wait are there more definitions for it? :)
I thought this is the only one "The multiverse is a hypothetical group of multiple universes including the universe in which humans live. Together, these universes comprise everything that exists: the entirety of space, time, matter, energy, the...
So, basically, multiverse make sense because we can't imagine our universe standing in nothing(or being everything that just expands itself).
If we take this principle, we should have a multi-multiverse, a multi-multi-multiverse and so on. (When the chain ends?).
Is it more evidence to support...