I What kind of matter formed Primordial Blackholes?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Mlesnita Daniel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Blackholes Matter
AI Thread Summary
Primordial black holes (PBHs) are theorized to have formed from regions of higher density in the early universe, rather than from "space" itself collapsing. The early universe exhibited non-homogeneous density, meaning some areas were denser and hotter, allowing these regions to potentially collapse into black holes. The discussion clarifies that the misleading phrasing in the referenced article may imply that space itself is collapsing, which is not accurate; rather, it is the matter within space that varies in density. While the existence of PBHs has not been definitively detected, they are not ruled out by current understanding. The conversation emphasizes the importance of precise language when discussing complex concepts in cosmology.
Mlesnita Daniel
Messages
16
Reaction score
2
I read somewhere "space was not completely homogenous (the same at every point). Instead, some areas were denser and hotter than others, and these dense regions could have collapsed into black holes." and I was wondering what does it exactly means?

Did space itself fall into becoming PBHs (primordial black holes) or it means that the matter that WAS IN space was denser and it collapsed to form such objects?

Thank you!

Edit: Where I read it: https://astronomy.com/news/2019/07/primordial-black-holes
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Mlesnita Daniel said:
I read somewhere
Where? Please provide a reference - it helps us to know what you know when we're answering.

Mlesnita Daniel said:
Did space itself fall into becoming PBHs (primordial black holes) or it means that the matter that WAS IN space was denser and it collapsed to form such objects
The matter. "Space itself" isn't really a concept that makes sense in general relativity. The density of matter in the early universe wasn't completely uniform, and if it varied enough it's possible that the densest bits collapsed to form black holes. I don't believe that the signatures of such things have been detected, but I don't think they are ruled out.
 
  • Like
Likes Mlesnita Daniel
I put the reference in an edit now, thanks for pointing out and thank you for clarifying!:)
 
The article should answer your questions.
 
I agree with the OP that the article is misleadingly phrased. It says:
astronomy.com said:
in that fraction of a second after the universe itself began, space was not completely homogenous (the same at every point). Instead, some areas were denser and hotter than others, and these dense regions could have collapsed into black holes.
That does read (incorrectly) like space is collapsing to form black holes. This part isn't making a clear distinction between space being non-homogeneous (true, with a certain amount of glossing over complicated topics) and the matter in space being non-homogeneous (also true). The two facts are inextricably related, but aren't exactly the same statement.

Maybe they were trying to avoid saying "matter"? It wasn't matter in the colloquial sense of a bunch of atoms. But it was the stuff that eventually cooled down (the bits of it that didn't fall into these hypothetical primordial black holes, anyway) to form matter and radiation as we see it today.
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...
Back
Top