PeroK's latest activity
-
PeroK reacted to syed's post in the thread I Could there be a non local theory without action at a distance? with
Skeptical.
Then you simply misunderstood, since the proposed influences obviously do not respect relativistic causality. The purpose of talking... -
PeroK reacted to PeterDonis's post in the thread I Could there be a non local theory without action at a distance? with
Like.
There is no generally accepted answer to this question. Read the last paragraph of my post #13. No, it isn't. Relativistic causality... -
PeroK reacted to syed's post in the thread I Could there be a non local theory without action at a distance? with
Sad.
I agree that the measurement operators commute, which means quantum theory doesn't assign a preferred time-ordering to them. But that’s... -
PeroK reacted to PeterDonis's post in the thread I Could there be a non local theory without action at a distance? with Like.
Because the measurements commute; it doesn't matter which one occurs first. The results are the same. In other words, when you think of...
-
PeroK reacted to syed's post in the thread I Could there be a non local theory without action at a distance? with Skeptical.
Let's look at a particular frame of reference. In a particular frame, measurement A occurs before measurement B. But before either...
-
PeroK reacted to PeterDonis's post in the thread I Could there be a non local theory without action at a distance? with Like.
No, this is not correct. Since the time ordering is frame-dependent, there cannot be any "determination" process involved such as you...
-
PeroK reacted to ARChohan's post in the thread A How do you convert the Pound–Rebka redshift into time variation? with
Wow.
Thank you for that. I appreciate it. Since I don't have a calculator capable of calculating exponents, I must also ask how much time... -
PeroK replied to the thread I Can entanglement swapping be explained without nonlocal influences?.By no longer thinking classically. And accepting that nature is described by states and not by particles at well-defined locations that...
-
PeroK reacted to FactChecker's post in the thread I Find f(z) given f(x, y) = u(x, y) + iv(x,y) with Like.
is analytic. Don't leave that part out. It is critical. Two analytic functions that are equal on the real line must be identical. So...
-
PeroK reacted to Nugatory's post in the thread I Could there be a non local theory without action at a distance? with Like.
The difficulty with any "travelling between measurement outcomes" model is that it implies a direction of travel: in any particular...
-
PeroK reacted to Demystifier's post in the thread I Is there any interpretation of QM that doesn't clash with intuition? with
Informative.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.05986 -
PeroK replied to the thread I Find f(z) given f(x, y) = u(x, y) + iv(x,y).Sorry, I haven't studied complex analysis properly since 1983!
-
PeroK replied to the thread B Work done when moving an object.If a force has a constant magnitude and direction, then a particle has constant acceleration (magnitide and direction). The motion, as...
-
PeroK replied to the thread I Is there any interpretation of QM that doesn't clash with intuition?.You can do the experiment in different directions. When you do experimental physics, you're allowed to be clever! Unless and until an...
-
PeroK replied to the thread I Is there any interpretation of QM that doesn't clash with intuition?.PS I like your posts, but a downside of learning QM this way is that you end up reading a lot of rubbish, like superdeterminism. Like...