pines-demon's latest activity
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread A What is the connection between entanglement and the no-cloning theorem?.Maybe start by telling us WHY you think there is a connection. There are many connections that could be made but knowing the context may...
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons.This is not possible. If the classical and quantum set ups give similar results then neither of them violates Bell inequalities. Most...
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread Predictions for the Nobel Prize in Physics 2025 (results: John Clarke, Michel H. Devoret and John M. Martinis).Maybe this year an economist will win the physics prize: (Jokes aside Hopfield deserved the prize, the connection of his work with spin...
-
Ppines-demon reacted to Haborix's post in the thread Predictions for the Nobel Prize in Physics 2025 (results: John Clarke, Michel H. Devoret and John M. Martinis) with
Haha.
OP seems to assume it will be awarded for work related to Physics. Recent practice shows that isn't a safe assumption o0) -
Ppines-demon reacted to Golden hunter's post in the thread Predictions for the Nobel Prize in Physics 2025 (results: John Clarke, Michel H. Devoret and John M. Martinis) with
Informative.
Hau and Harris revolved mainly around electromagnetically induced transparency and slow / stopped light (in ultracold gases) ... -
Ppines-demon replied to the thread Predictions for the Nobel Prize in Physics 2025 (results: John Clarke, Michel H. Devoret and John M. Martinis).She has often been nominated for the Nobel with Stephen E. Harris (Clarivate 2012).
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons.Who is being cryptic? 1) Please be explicit on what is the calculation to perform to check if there is interference. 2) Why is it needed?
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons.This is getting very cryptic. I take ##S_\theta=S_x\cos\theta+S_p\sin\theta=\alpha S_x+\beta S_p##, I do what then? ##S_\theta^2## or...
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons.Isn’t ##\alpha\beta=\cos\theta\sin\theta## different than 0 for most angles?
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons.Is this related to the state? to the observables or to what? I am lost here. There are clearly interference terms in whatever you are...
-
Ppines-demon reacted to PeterDonis's post in the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons with
Like.
How does it even make sense to combine position and momentum eigenkets? I don't understand what you're doing here. -
Ppines-demon reacted to PeterDonis's post in the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons with
Like.
Fair enough, replace my minus sign with a plus sign and make them bosons. :oops: -
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons.I think you misunderstood, see the edit to post #37, are you telling me that you can write $$|\psi\rangle=\int \mathrm d x |x\rangle...
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons.Can you be more explicit? What do you mean that it does not contain interferences?
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons.We were writing in short form, the initial state has an integral ##\int \mathrm d x\, |x\rangle |\pm x\rangle##. (I will edit it) Also...
