pines-demon's latest activity

I thought that was clear, I did not wait until you found out, more like I was discussing without knowing that you got something off (I...

Are you saying that the original EPR does not work because particles are spinless (and indistinguishable)?

I proposed a state and some operators. You replied by saying that there is no interference in that case. I asked what interference, you...

Let's try, but I am not going to go point by point validating your arguments. (Of course, but) I was not sure where the 1/0 vs 1/-1...

Only if the result of measuring the particle is only consistent with one given result for the qubit. Whether that's the case will depend...

Check this article on how it has been hard to claim that toponium IS a thing: Don’t call it toponium

I’m not quoting (myself). I am quoting Jacob Barandes in a podcast. No. Imagine that the qubit is given by the spin of a neutron. Let’s...

The screen will measure the particle, but does that imply a given result for the qubit?

That isn't a quote from @pines-demon. It's @pines-demon quoting from the transcript of the podcast he linked to.

How many times has this been claimed before?

If we have ##\psi (0)= \sum_m c_m \psi_m## at ##t=0##, then ##\psi(t)=\sum_m c_m e^{\frac{-iE_m t }{\hbar}} \psi_m## so ##\langle H...

Oh so you want a dynamic state (changing in time) but with stationary expectation value? But then the issue is that you never measure...

This is not true, unless I am reading it wrongly.

Quantum mechanics

According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the...