Recent content by SdogV

Revised: Errors revealed in re-reading first draft post above. Sorry, too impulsive. DIMENSION AND PROBABILITY by Ted Erikson R/E Unltd, Chicago What identifies a position or location but has no "dimension" and zero "probability" of measurement? Certainly this implies a point. But what are...

See first entry for what was found there and elsewhere!

So, what is a definitive definition of "dimension" and "probability" to use in Physics?

Anyone care to critique this talk abstract for the CSAAPT Meeting, 3/16/2013? DIMENSIONAL PROBABILITIES by Ted Erikson R/E Unltd, Chicago What identifies a position or location but has no "dimension" and zero "probability" of measurement? Certainly this implies a point. But what are...

Is this a dead end? I see the definition of active gravitational mass as having the units of cubic meters per seconds squared, i.e. squared velocity of light times lambda, a wavelength or a "communication" distance between two masses!)

Let’s try to change thinking. IF all is "space-time", as suggested in the Matsas et al paper... arXiv:0711.4276v2 [physics.class-ph] 4 Dec 2007 ... then everything can be described with directions, (say) X, Y, and Z and lengths of delta's x, y, and z PLUS time in directions, X, Y, and Z...

Trying, but little follow up so far. Printed out their revised Feb 2, 2008 (arXiv:0711.4276v2 [physics.class-ph] 4 Dec 2007) version. Clearly it's possible significance lies in unveiling a clue to a relation between inertial and "active" gravitational mass. (Note # 14 in references) So...

Fundamental constants are two, definitely. http://www.nature.com/news/2007/071220/full/news.2007.389.html

So, I just ran into the Matsas article and simply ignore his background as below the Equator and try to apply his concept to my background. So if I understand correctly, meters and seconds can define energy such that Kg-m^2/(sec^2 , with mass as m^3/sec^2 , becomes (m^5)/sec^4 , or simply...

So, now I look at a peculiar situation with light photon motion and growth.. Can anyone comment on this thought? Assume frequency is VERY important. Then, E=Mc^2 might imply E- M A'cf where (a) A' is meters squared per sec, i.e., m^2/t (lower case m is meters!) and (b) f is frequency...

I checked that link, but it looked like particles are being accelerated in order to produce photons, NOT playing with a controlled source of photons. In my old research days, I was impressed by the fact that crossing electrical discharges to make coronas at different frequencies in a low...

It seems reasonable to assume that "things" (mass, energy, space, etc.) have an awareness for their surroundings, i.e. like life, they respond as their constitution, composition, and conditioning permits. Light as photons requires (needs?) mass for validation. Mass requires (needs?) time for...

Panpsychism is becoming more prevalent in the literature. On a very, very primeaval level, isn't it possible that mass itself is conscious? That is, defining life as an ":awareness" (self to otherness, observer to observed, etc.) suggests water has an "awareness" to always boil at 100 degC...

Since the Planck Mass equals square root of (hc/G)... perhaps we SHOULD be considering the negative root in our model(s) somewhere.. Re: CompuChip comment: Aren't mass, distance (and time) measurements arbitrary, i.e. based on a scaled reference. Why make them transcendental, like pi and...