Recent content by skateboarding
-
S
Langevin equation in external potential
I am trying to solve the following equation. m\frac{du}{dt}=-\gamma u -\frac{dV}{dx} + A(t) Where u is the momentum, x is position, V is the external potential dependent on position, and A is the random stochastic force dependent on time. There is no initial condition in this problem, but...- skateboarding
- Thread
- Potential
- Replies: 1
- Forum: Advanced Physics Homework Help
-
S
Integral xsinx limits 0 to infinity
Homework Statement So I'm trying to evaluate the following integral: 4\pi r^2{\int_0}^\infty r^2\frac{\sin{sr}}{sr}dr which after canceling out one of the r's, gives an integral similar to that of xsinx. I need to show that this integral vanishes for all values of s that are not 0...- skateboarding
- Thread
- Infinity Integral Limits
- Replies: 1
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
S
Can Operators Be Divided in the Schrodinger Equation Derivation?
I had a math question about the following steps. The Shroedinger's equation can be written as follows. \LARGE i\hbar \frac{d}{dt}U(t) |\psi(0)> = HU(t)|\psi(0)> Where H is the hamiltonian and U is the time evolution operator. So U satisfies the Schrödinger equation. \LARGE...- skateboarding
- Thread
- Derivation Picture Schrödinger
- Replies: 1
- Forum: Advanced Physics Homework Help
-
S
Integral of e^iwt: Solving for \omega & t Values
fixed it For particle location, perturbation theory, etc, I see the following integral. \LARGE \int_0^t { e^{i\omega t^'}}dt^' Where \omega is some constant, or frequency. It says in my text that this is equal to 0 if \omega is not close to 0. My logic leads me to think that when...- skateboarding
- Post #4
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
S
Integral of e^iwt: Solving for \omega & t Values
Oops, forgot the denominator. I think that for large t, This integral becomes a delta function. Still working on it. Thanks.- skateboarding
- Post #3
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
S
Integral of e^iwt: Solving for \omega & t Values
For particle location, perturbation theory, etc, I see the following integral. \LARGE \int_0^t { e^{i\omega t^'}}dt^' Where \omega is some constant, or frequency. It says in my text that this is equal to 0 if \omega is not close to 0. My logic leads me to think that when \omega is...- skateboarding
- Thread
- Integral
- Replies: 3
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
S
Graduate Solving Integral of e^wix for Particle Location
For particle location, perturbation theory, etc, I see the following integral. \LARGE \int_0^t { e^{i\omega t^'}}dt^' Where \omega is some constant, or frequency. It says in my text that this is equal to 0 if \omega is not close to 0. My logic leads me to think that when \omega is...- skateboarding
- Thread
- Integral
- Replies: 1
- Forum: Calculus
-
S
Graduate Isothermal Compressibility always positive proof
I think I figured out the problem. Hopefully I didn't make any huge mistakes. Consider an isolated volume partitioned by a moveable impermeable membrane. \LARGE V_{total} = V_A + V_B since total volume is constant \LARGE (1) \hspace*{5mm} dV_A = -dV_B We can write the total...- skateboarding
- Post #5
- Forum: Thermodynamics
-
S
Graduate Isothermal Compressibility always positive proof
Yes, this is true for ideal gases, and probably in general that the negative of the compressibility is positive. But this is based on empirical evidence of positive pressure. Of course there are meta stable systems with negative pressure, but not for true equilibrium. This seems good enough...- skateboarding
- Post #3
- Forum: Thermodynamics
-
S
Graduate Isothermal Compressibility always positive proof
I have a question on the quantity -(dV/dP)T,N where V = volume, P = pressure, T = temp, N = number of moles and T, N are held constant. I see in textbooks that this quantity is always positive at equilibrium. It makes intuitive sense, as if it were negative, it would be unphysical. I've been...- skateboarding
- Thread
- Compressibility Isothermal Positive Proof
- Replies: 4
- Forum: Thermodynamics