Recent content by skrtic

  1. S

    Starting with the definition of the Dirac delta function,

    so assuming i made the substitution right and that was what i was supposed to do, i still don't see how i proved that it equals zero. is that supposed to say if i plug in zero for x i get zero? and even if i treat \delta(\sqrt{x}) as \delta(\sqrt{x}-0)...
  2. S

    Starting with the definition of the Dirac delta function,

    is this a valid assumption treat \delta(\sqrt{x}) as \delta(\sqrt{x}-0)
  3. S

    Starting with the definition of the Dirac delta function,

    let x= \sqrt{z} then dx=(1/2)z^(-1/2)dz and we get [SIZE="4"] \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dz z^{-1/2} f(z^{-1/2})\delta(z^{-1/2})
  4. S

    Starting with the definition of the Dirac delta function,

    from what i get out of the text. it is what replaces an inner product that vanishes if x doesn't equal x'. I also know that it's integral is unity.
  5. S

    Starting with the definition of the Dirac delta function,

    Homework Statement Starting with the definition of the Dirac delta function, show that \delta( \sqrt{x}) um... i have looked in my book and looked online for a problem like this and i really have no clue where to start. the only time i have used the dirac delta function is in an integral...
  6. S

    A triple integral involving deltas

    ok. that makes sense. and kinda looks familiar now that i see it and makes the problem a little better. thanks
  7. S

    A triple integral involving deltas

    SOLVEDHomework Statement evaluate the intergralHomework Equationssorry about how this is going to look don't know the language to display nicely and wouldn't take my copy and pasteall integrals are form -infinity to infinity (x^2+32*z^2)*cos(y)*e^(x-4*z) delta(x-1) delta (y-pi) delta(z-.25)...
  8. S

    How Can I Verify a Canonical Transformation Using the Poisson Bracket?

    Homework Statement Verify that q_bar=ln(q^-1*sin(p)) p_bar=q*cot(p) * represents muliplication sorry i don't know how to use the programming to make it look better 2. The attempt at a solution my problem is that i really have no clue what is going on. I have read...
  9. S

    Proving Determinant of Unitary Matrix is Complex Number of Unit Modulus

    thanks for the help. i think i have it now. i think i had it a while ago but didn't reason it to myself right. i tried to prove a little more than i had to.
  10. S

    Proving Determinant of Unitary Matrix is Complex Number of Unit Modulus

    this is my attempt i just thought about. call the matrix R abs(det(R x R*))=1 since R x R* is I and det(I) = 1 and then abs(det(R) x det(R*))=1 and i get to a^2d^2+b^2c^2=1 but i don't know if that does anything for me
  11. S

    Proving Determinant of Unitary Matrix is Complex Number of Unit Modulus

    well my problem gives the matrix of [[a,b][c,d]] and gives the det([[a,b][c,d]])=ad-bc then states the question i gave above. i read that the |det(unitary matrix)|=1, but isn't that what i am trying to solve for. and i am not sure if i have seen the definition of unitary matrices in the form...
  12. S

    What Deceleration Prevents a Train Collision?

    well first off we need to know the direction of the locomotive that is traveling at 27.2 km/h before we can do too much. but basically you are looking for a=? . what must the deceleration of the train be to stop before it hits the locomotive?
  13. S

    Proving Determinant of Unitary Matrix is Complex Number of Unit Modulus

    [FONT="Arial Black"][SIZE="7"]SOLVED 1. show that the determinant of a unitary matrix is a complex number of unit modulus 2. i know the equation for a determinant, but i guess to i am not sure what a complex number of unit modulus is either. I'm looking for...
Back
Top