Recent content by Tangent87

  1. T

    B The Universe vs Observable Universe

    Thanks all. Think it makes sense to me now.
  2. T

    B The Universe vs Observable Universe

    After reading the wikipedia article and looking at many other threads on this forum I am still having a hard time understanding the difference between the Observable universe and the entire universe... Why is the entire universe not observable to us? The Big Bang happened 13.8 billion years...
  3. T

    General Relativity - Killing Vectors and Geodesics

    Ah I see thanks. I've worked it through now and it does come out, the key is to not try and differentiate out the brackets but just deduce that the stuff inside the brackets must be a constant.
  4. T

    General Relativity - Killing Vectors and Geodesics

    Hmm okay, so now on the next line I get: \left(\frac{dv}{du}u^2\dot{u}\right)_{,u}\dot{u} + \left(\dot{v}u^2\right)_{,v}\dot{v}=\frac{d^2v}{du^2}u^2\dot{u}^2 + 2\frac{dv}{du}u\dot{u}^2 + \frac{dv}{du}u^2\ddot{u} + \ddot{v}u^2=0 Is that correct? Have you worked through it to the end sgd37?
  5. T

    General Relativity - Killing Vectors and Geodesics

    It is, I got it from 2010 Part II paper 2 page 22: http://www.maths.cam.ac.uk/undergrad/pastpapers/2010/Part_II/PaperII_2.pdf [Broken]
  6. T

    General Relativity - Killing Vectors and Geodesics

    Thank you for replying. Ok so when we put k^c=(0,1) in we get: 0=\left(\dot{x}^ag_{av}\right)_{,b}\dot{x}^b=\left(\dot{v}g_{vv}\right)_{,b}\dot{x}^b=\left(\dot{v}u^2\right)_{,b}\dot{x}^b=\left(\dot{v}u^2\right)_{,u}\dot{u}+\left(\dot{v}u^2\right)_{,v}\dot{v} So now are you saying that...
  7. T

    General Relativity - Killing Vectors and Geodesics

    Hi, I'm stuck on the last bit the attached question where we're given the metric ds^2=-du^2+u^2dv^2 and have to use equation (*) to find the geodesic equations. They tell us to use V^a=\dot{x}^a the tangent vector to the geodesic and presumably we use the three killing vectors they gave us, so...
  8. T

    Schrodinger picture derivation

    If you're not happy with separating variables you can always use an integrating factor: \LARGE \frac{d}{dt}\left(U(t)e^{iHt/{\hbar}}\right) = 0 So then: \LARGE U(t)e^{iHt/{\hbar}} = U(0) U(0) can be normalised to 1 therefore \LARGE U(t) = e^{-iHt/\hbar}
  9. T

    Quantum Mechanics - Identical and Non-Identical Spin 1 particles

    Ah okay, that clears everything up, thanks again.
  10. T

    Quantum Mechanics - Identical and Non-Identical Spin 1 particles

    So in order to have the wavefunction being antisymmetric would I need to have something like \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\psi_1(A)\psi_2(B)-\psi_2(A)\psi_1(B))? The only trouble I have with this is that the wavefunction now involves terms from the second energy level whilst we're only dealing with the...
  11. T

    Quantum Mechanics - Identical and Non-Identical Spin 1 particles

    Hi, I am doing question 32D on page 18 here: http://www.maths.cam.ac.uk/undergrad/pastpapers/2005/Part_2/PaperII_3.pdf [Broken] and I am stuck on the second paragraph where we have to explain how to construct the two-particle states of lowest energy for (i). identical spin-1 particles with...
  12. T

    General Relativity - Riemann Tensor and Killing Vector Identity

    Ahhh thanks, done it now. It seems I was definitely going about it the wrong way.
  13. T

    General Relativity - Riemann Tensor and Killing Vector Identity

    Can anybody help me out with deriving the identity V_{a;b;c}=V_eR^e_{cba}? Forget about the EM stuff I don't care so much about that but I'd be very grateful for some help in deriving that identity. Thanks
  14. T

    Stuck with an Integral

    Because the residue should be pi, not 2pi because when you close the semi-circular contour in the upper half plane you only go round the origin on an infinitesimal semi-circle so it's pi, it would be 2pi if we went all around the origin on a full circle but we don't in this case. (It might help...
  15. T

    General Relativity - Riemann Tensor and Killing Vector Identity

    The problem is part of a larger question (see page 59 here http://www.maths.cam.ac.uk/undergrad/pastpapers/2004/Part_2/list_II.pdf [Broken]) and I'm having trouble with the last bit as well where it goes into the EM stuff, I know it must obviously somehow relate to everything we've done above...
Top