Recent content by Vereinsamt

  1. V

    When can we ignore the delta function in th Feynman rules?

    in peskin-schroeder and http://www.hep.phy.cam.ac.uk/batley/particles/handout_04.pdf" the amplitude for e^-e^+\rightarrow \mu^- \mu^+ is written using feynman rules as follows -iM=[\bar{v}(p_2)(-ie\gamma^\mu )u(p_1)] \frac{-ig_{\mu\nu}}{q^2}[\bar{u}(k_1)(-ie\gamma^\nu )v(k_2)] but what...
  2. V

    A question about trace technology

    i'll try to prove it to make sure i got it.. thanks nrqed!
  3. V

    A question about trace technology

    ok, i have another question that should have came earlier (p'\!\!\!\!\!/ \ -m)_{da}\gamma^\mu_{ab}(p\!\!\!\!\!/ \ +m)_{bc}\gamma^\nu_{cd} =\operatorname{Tr}[(p'\!\!\!\!\!/ \ -m)\gamma^\mu(p\!\!\!\!\!/ \ +m)\gamma^\nu] where the trace came from here?
  4. V

    A question about trace technology

    thanx for help Glenn! i'll give it another shot
  5. V

    A question about trace technology

    i didn't know that we can commute p with gamma and put it out of the trace! would you tell me why we can do this?
  6. V

    A question about trace technology

    \operatorname{tr}(8p'^\nu p^\mu) - \operatorname{tr}(2mp'^\mu \gamma^\nu) + \operatorname{tr}(2m\gamma^\mu p^\nu) + \operatorname{tr}(2m^2g^{\mu\nu}) am i on the right way?
  7. V

    A question about trace technology

    ok tell me please how to trace this thing \operatorname{tr}(\gamma^\nu\gamma^\mu p'_\mu\gamma^\mu\gamma^\nu p_\nu)? why it can't show \operatorname{tr}(\gamma^\nu\gamma^\mu p'_\mu\gamma^\mu\gamma^\nu p_\nu)? the last is what i want to ask
  8. V

    A question about trace technology

    yes, i just want to know how to get from the left hand side to the right hand side. the problem mabye is thas i am not familiar with traces of gamma matrices. i'll try to learn it then come with a more concrete question.. but if anybody can give some hints that helps i'll be grateful.
  9. V

    A question about trace technology

    Hi everybody! While reading Peskin-Schroeder, i stuck in the in equation 5.4 about the unpolarized cross section of the e^- e^+ \rightarrow \mu^- \mu^+ annihilation. i didn't understand how this relationof the electron trace came to be, and where the indices came from...
  10. V

    If the second equation is correct, then the volume is infinite.

    Volume between two surfaces? hi guys, i hope you can help with this, how to find the volume between those surfases: x^2+y^2+z^2=0 z=\sqrt{x^2+y^2} thanks in advance
  11. V

    The fundemental forces: four or three?

    thank you Javier, but sorry, I know nothing about group theory! did you mean they are unified under another theory that doesn't describe the other interactions?
  12. V

    The fundemental forces: four or three?

    The fundamental forces: four or three? They still counting them as four though the the elctromagnatic and the weak have been unified. so why not three? thanks
  13. V

    Solve Integral: Nightmare | x*ln(x+sqrt{1+x^2})

    yes. there was an error in deffirentiating ln. I appiciate ur help arildno :) anyway what about other interesting methods? thanx alot
  14. V

    Solve Integral: Nightmare | x*ln(x+sqrt{1+x^2})

    I am a self-study and new to calculus and have no experience, so I hope u explain more about ur point
  15. V

    Solve Integral: Nightmare | x*ln(x+sqrt{1+x^2})

    by doing this I got \int{udv}=ln(x+t)t-\int\frac{(2t+1)xdx} {x+t} where t=\sqrt{1+x^2} is it right? and how then?
Back
Top