Gentelmen/ladies,
I did not mean to cause this, I do not have the luxury to participate in this as I would like.
Bottom line is, dealing with the 'renormaliztion group' it is just a way of re-calibrating your search, that was so aptly said above ^^, and in this case the Higgs. You cannot...
Happy New Year,
I understand the concern above with renormalizability , when working on our degrees we are encouraged to take paths that have been proven, this is not said but assumed & we all know that when working on the paper it must be outside the perimeters of the ordinary for us to...
Good question.
ernie,
It is hard to read the emotion dealing with correspondence, unless you put it all in upper case. I think you are just asking why?
I am not sure this is to be proactive in the search or just frustration in what we are dealing with in the Higgs.
It is a very hot...
Higgs
Thank you Hans,
I am aware of the papers, it is greatly appreciated. [Drs. R. L. Mills & C. N. Yang / Drs. Glashow, A. Salam & Weinberg in the award pointing the way].
I am in a discussion of the GeV needed, some believe it will be
115 GeV/c^2, I believe more in the 250 GeV/c^2...
Hello,
For clarification because of the ambiguous situation in searching for & concerning the Higgs Field. It is with 95% confidence that the Higgs Field exists.
Yet it has not been seen as of the end of 2005. I hope LHC/CERN will shed light on the subject. Anyone dealing or knowledge...