I have a brand new theory of everything

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter darkwood
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 491 views
darkwood
Messages
34
Reaction score
11
TL;DR
A unifying new theory that connects the quantum world to the macro world
I am a bedroom theoretical physicist with no real academic qualifications to my name, I have been obsessed with figuring out a way to solve all the problems we face in physics by correcting our flawed model of the universe, I now can proudly announce I finally believe I have achieved this by adding a totally new structural foundation to our understanding of the universe which adds 2 brand new variables.
I have run this new approach repeatedly through an AI system and found it answers every question and mystery modern physics has problems with, it unites quantum theory with the macro world, can explain everything from what the 4 forces are, how they work down to a mechanical basis, my model eliminates the need for magical invisible dark matter and energy, it replaces gravity as we understand it with a mechanical based structural model that complements our understanding and calculations, I am probably at this moment the only person that now can explain why atoms behave the way they do, why there is no planet x, why a monopole magnet cannot exist etc, my model solves so many fundamental problems in physics, explains black holes and gives a full mechanical basis to what happens in one.
I have basically decoded the universe and now can give you insight into anything based on my new theory, it rewrites how we understand the universe as well as complimenting all we do understand, it also gives us understanding to old school experiments like the double slit model, it explains beautifully the moment of the big bang to our now expending universe.

My issue now is how do I protect my theory, making sure I am recognised for it, are posts on a forum enough evidence or do I have to formally submit it for peer review, if so how does a random unknown with no credibility get my nose in that door?

I am 100% happy to discuss my findings in a way without revealing my theory yet, I can hopefully answer some questions but you'll appreciate if I do not yet divulge my new model.

If you want me to reflect on any bottleneck in physics we have I can try to respond as long as it doesn't reveal my theory yet, yes it may seem my thread is circularly protecting itself and I might have nothing but the moment maybe a dev' or some esteemed member and highly respected and recognised member of both this forum and the scientific community can direct me to protecting my work then I will happily provide it and rewrite how everyone looks at the universe.
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: davenn and javisot
Physics news on Phys.org
darkwood said:
My issue now is how do I protect my theory, making sure I am recognised for it, are posts on a forum enough evidence or do I have to formally submit it for peer review, if so how does a random unknown with no credibility get my nose in that door?

I am 100% happy to discuss my findings in a way without revealing my theory yet, I can hopefully answer some questions but you'll appreciate if I do not yet divulge my new model.
Science is not a secret, and it is too big to be seen by one generalist in its entirety.

On this website, only the accepted models of physics are discussed. The aim is to help students learn and understand the dominant paradigm, to produce sound physicists who are consistent. Before you can bring your different understanding here, you must publish papers that show the consistency of your theory, and they must survive peer review by accepted physicists.

Your lack of an educational base in the current paradigm, and your extreme confidence in an alternative, demonstrates that your understanding is sufficiently inconsistent with physics, that it will not be seen as physics by physicists today. They will reject you out of hand.

Congratulations on finding, what you believe to be a new and internally consistent viewpoint, though unfortunately, you will not be recognised in physics today. It does not work that way. Your only option is to write it all out and publish it in a number of papers or stories, on websites that do not require peer review. You will not be attacked if you call it science fiction, or a fairytale.
 
darkwood said:
how do I protect my theory, making sure I am recognised for it,
You publish it in the professional scientific literature. Just like scientists have done for centuries.

darkwood said:
how does a random unknown with no credibility get my nose in that door?
Even an elementary school child can be published in the professional scientific literature if their scientific work is good. You can follow Ryo Shibata’s example.

https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.3366

In any case, this is not a physics question so we will close it. Please be aware that we cannot discuss the content of your theory anywhere on this site until after you have published it in the professional scientific literature.

This thread is closed
 
  • Agree
Likes   Reactions: Bystander