Continuity of the tangential components of electric field across an interface

  • Level: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter hunt_mat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Boundary conditions
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 510 views
Homework Helper
Messages
1,818
Reaction score
33
TL;DR
How much can you get via natural boundary conditions?
Recently, I've gotten interested in applying Lagrangian mechanics to everything. I thought I would apply it to electrostatics. If I choose a Lagrangian of the form
[tex]L=\int_{\Omega}\frac{\epsilon}{2}|\nabla V|^{2}+\rho VdA[/tex]
For two different regions, the interfacial condition for the normal components of the electric field pop out as natural boundary conditions.

I see no way of obtaining the interfacial conditions for the tangential components of the electric field. Does anyone know how to do this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hunt_mat said:
[tex]L=\int_{\Omega}\frac{\epsilon}{2}|\nabla V|^{2}+\rho VdA[/tex]
Sorry, I have questions about how I should interpret your notation:
  1. Is ##dA## a 2-D area-element or a 3-D volume-element?
  2. Is your integration region ##\Omega## a 2-D area or a 3-D volume?
  3. Why is ##\frac{\epsilon}{2}|\nabla V|^{2}## not multiplied by ##dA##?
 
1) dA is an area element for simplicity.
2) [itex]\Omega[/itex] is an area.
3) I think you're a little confused to how integrals work. [itex]\frac{\epsilon}{2}|\nabla V|^{2}+\rho V[/itex] is the integrand.
 
hunt_mat said:
1) dA is an area element for simplicity.
2) [itex]\Omega[/itex] is an area.
Thanks for clarifying.
hunt_mat said:
3) I think you're a little confused to how integrals work. [itex]\frac{\epsilon}{2}|\nabla V|^{2}+\rho V[/itex] is the integrand.
Then you should use parentheses to avoid confusing your readers: ##L=\int_{\Omega}\left(\frac{\epsilon}{2}|\nabla V|^{2}+\rho V\right)dA##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DaveE, berkeman, WWGD and 1 other person
I believe that continuity of the component parallel to the interface is automatically satisfied, provided your variational formulation implicitly assumes continuity of the potential at the interface.
 
I may be missing something, but in electrostatics ##E_s = -\frac{\partial V}{\partial s}.## If the potential is continuous across the interface, doesn't the continuity of the tangential field (along the ##s##-direction) follow automatically?