How does the curvature of the universe evolve in cyclic models?

AI Thread Summary
The curvature of the universe, denoted as \Omega_k, is currently observed to be nearly flat, a condition influenced by inflation that drove it close to zero. Before inflation, the exact value of \Omega_k is largely unknown, as inflation significantly diluted curvature due to its energy density being nearly constant during that period. As the universe expands, the curvature becomes more significant in matter-dominated phases, while it diminishes during inflation. In cyclic models, which propose a finite universe, there is potential for understanding curvature changes, as discussed in the book "The Endless Universe" by Paul Steinhardt and Neil Turok. Overall, the evolution of the universe's curvature remains a complex topic with many unknowns, particularly regarding pre-inflation conditions.
zeebo17
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
How has the curvature of the universe changed with time?

I know that the universe is observed to nearly flat at the present time and that inflation was proposed (one of the reasons) to drive the universe to be almost perfectly flat. Do we have any idea what \Omegak could have been like before inflation and how it changed during inflation?

Thanks!
 
Space news on Phys.org
zeebo17 said:
How has the curvature of the universe changed with time?

I know that the universe is observed to nearly flat at the present time and that inflation was proposed (one of the reasons) to drive the universe to be almost perfectly flat. Do we have any idea what \Omegak could have been like before inflation and how it changed during inflation?

Thanks!
Basically, the curvature portion \Omega_k changes with the energy density as 1/a^2. So if, for instance, you are matter dominated, as matter dilutes as 1/a^3, as the universe expands curvature becomes more and more important. By contrast, during inflation, our universe was dominated by some stuff that acted much like a cosmological constant, which means its energy density was nearly independent of the expansion. So as the expansion progressed during inflation, the curvature diluted away as 1/a^2. As a result, we can't really know what it was before inflation began, as inflation set it to be nearly identically zero due to the massive increase in a during that time.
 
That remains mostly in the realm of the unknowable. Our best effort to probe beyond the surface of last scattering is WMAP. The evidence is still tenuous. If we assume the universe arose from a 'big bang', we are forced to assume something prevented it from either immediately collapsing, or expanding out of view.
.
 
In a one time big bang model, as noted, so far we know little if anything before inflation, as things were apparently infinite or at least our models break down there.

But in cyclic models of the universe, where the bang is finite and mathematically consistent, such information is available. One such model is the subject of a recent book: THE ENDLESS UNIVERSE, BY Paul Steinhardt and Neil Turok, 2007. I don't recall them specifically mentioning omega in the book.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...

Similar threads

Back
Top