Recent claims by scientists about the best evidence for Bigfoot, including twisted trees in Siberia, have sparked skepticism and criticism. Many participants in the discussion express disappointment with the evidence presented, questioning its validity and relevance. The notion that twisted trees could indicate Bigfoot activity is met with ridicule, as some argue that more concrete evidence, such as DNA or physical remains, is necessary to support the existence of such a creature. The reporting by "The Sun" is also criticized for lacking depth and clarity, with participants expressing confusion over the claims made by biologist John Bindernagel regarding the trees and their potential connection to Bigfoot. Overall, the conversation highlights a broader skepticism about the scientific rigor behind Bigfoot research and the reliance on anecdotal evidence.
