Linear algebra and abstract algebra simultaneously?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the feasibility of taking an abstract algebra course without prior completion of linear algebra, especially for a sophomore interested in pursuing a major in pure mathematics and graduate studies. The individual expresses a desire to engage in advanced courses and research early in their academic career, despite scheduling conflicts that prevented them from taking linear algebra earlier. Participants highlight the importance of university guidelines regarding course prerequisites and co-requisites, emphasizing that the rigor and expectations of specific courses can vary significantly between institutions. They caution against relying solely on online opinions and stress the need to consult academic advisors or course syllabi to determine if concurrent enrollment in both courses is manageable.
interloper
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Is this a good idea (provided the university will allow it)? I'll be going into my sophomore year at my university. But I'm unfamiliar with exactly how much linear algebra an intro course in abstract algebra would require. In hindsight I probably should have taken linear last semester, but scheduling issues meant that I would have had to sacrifice a lot to do it. I'm interested in doing a major in pure math and maybe going to grad school, and thus I want to get involved with research as early as possible. For this reason I want to start taking advanced courses soon, and abstract felt like a good place to start.

There are other math courses I could take instead, but most of them seem to require linear algebra, and the ones that don't either interfere with my schedule or are only offered spring semester. Since abstract algebra seems to build from fundamentals, it felt like a good option. Thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Um...why are you asking us?

I think you hit a key point with "provided the university will allow it". Why would you take the recommendations of a bunch of folks on the internet over those of the university?

Courses in Linear vary from "a bag of computational tricks" all the way to "abstract lite". We can't tell how much rigor your particular university's version has, and we can't tell how much prior knowledge the abstract professor expects the students to walk in with. That's what prereqs and co-reqs are for. Taking them concurrently might work out, or you might get squashed like a bug.
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...

Similar threads

Back
Top