Different ball weights down incline

  • Thread starter Thread starter gigglin_horse
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Incline
AI Thread Summary
When two balls of different weights are placed on the same incline, they theoretically roll down together due to gravity's uniform acceleration, which is independent of mass. However, if one ball is hollow, its inertia could affect the outcome, potentially causing it to roll differently. The discussion highlights the importance of considering whether the balls are rolling or sliding, as this impacts the analysis of forces and acceleration. If sliding, the acceleration equation simplifies and mass does not influence the rate of descent. In contrast, if rolling, a rotational analysis must be included to fully understand the dynamics involved.
gigglin_horse
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
"If two balls, of different weight where put on the same incline, would they roll down together? Explain using Newtons laws."

I tried it, and as I thought, the heavy one went faster, but why?


A=F/m

...but force is said to be "mass x gravity (9.8N) x sin (the angle)"
but divided by mass and its just gravity x sin angle...so they roll together?

I'm confused. Please help me ASAP!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gravity is 9.8m/s^2 not Newtons. Therfore if theta is 45 degrees the magnitude of acceleration =ma*sqrt(2)/2m the mass makes no difference until you get to terminal velocities. The inertia can make a difference however. Theoretically they would roll down together, unless these balls had different inetria( one was hollow).
 
Last edited:
this may be true, but you also need to consider the net force on the object and thus with an increased mass the force normal at that angle would be higher on the larger mass object resulting in an larger frictional force as long as the force applied are reasonalby the same. I would then have to think about the forces applied on ther masses to determine the rate of accleration of each mass. when we look at all of this our equation for each acceleration would be something like:

a= [ (sin 45(fg)) + -(cos 45(fg)) ] / m

where fg is the wieght of each ball. this will allow you to consider the rate of each as it rolls down a displacement.
 
Are the balls actually rolling, or are they simply sliding down the incline?

If they're simply sliding, your initial analysis is correct (not sure why it confused you!). The equation ends up being independent of the mass. Of course, this is for the case where there is no friction and a different analysis would be required if friction were present.

If they are actually balls rolling down the incline, then you need to do a rotational analysis of the situation as well. In physics, rolling has a special meaning, so if it is just referring to sliding, then the question is worded poorly.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Back
Top