How Would You Choose the Winning Number in This Game?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kaleidoscope
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Game Model
AI Thread Summary
In a game where 1000 players must choose a positive number greater than 0, the objective is to select the lowest non-repeated number to win. If any positive real number is allowed, an infinitesimal hyperreal number close to 0 is suggested as a strategic choice due to its uniqueness. However, if restricted to natural numbers, players must consider human psychology and the likelihood of others' choices, with some suggesting numbers like 63 to minimize repetition. The discussion highlights the potential for interesting patterns in number selection if the game were played multiple times, with considerations of probability distributions influencing choices. Ultimately, understanding both mathematical strategies and psychological factors is crucial for winning the game.
kaleidoscope
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
a group of 1000 players are asked to write a number greater than 0. the player who writes the lowest non-repeated number wins a prize.

how would you determine which number to pick?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
case A: if it can be any "type" of number (if the game is not limited to natural numbers- which is what I assume to be the case) just go for an infinitesimal hyperreal infinitely close to 0 (non-standard analysis thingie). not many will think of that one, and besides there is an infinity of such numbers so the chances of 2 people picking the same number are rather low. :P

B: if the game is limited to natural numbers between 0 and 1000... hmmm, that's tricky- I'm not sure.
is there any probabilities and human psychology expert around?

EDIT:
... ooops, I wasn't quite paying attention... 1000 players must choose a positive number... not a number between 0 and 1000... well, I guess case A is a good choice then. :D
 
Last edited:
If we can choose any positive real number, this is basically the same as trying to think of the largest number you possibly can, then take it's reciprocal.

This is interesting only if it is restricted to positive integers. Psychology is definitely involved, since you have to imagine what numbers the other 1000 might choose. I'm thinking I'd choose something fairly high to avoid repeating another's pick. Perhaps 63 or somewhere thereabouts?

It would be interesting to repeat this game a number of times and see what sort of distribution the numbers follow.
 
I like to argue that suppose a player chose numbers follow an exponential distribution. Positive skewed exponential mean incline to choose small number but not too small.

The 1000 chosen numbers is certainly an ordered finite set. Use binomial principle I can know the probability of X number of people chose numbers lower than me.
 
I was reading documentation about the soundness and completeness of logic formal systems. Consider the following $$\vdash_S \phi$$ where ##S## is the proof-system making part the formal system and ##\phi## is a wff (well formed formula) of the formal language. Note the blank on left of the turnstile symbol ##\vdash_S##, as far as I can tell it actually represents the empty set. So what does it mean ? I guess it actually means ##\phi## is a theorem of the formal system, i.e. there is a...

Similar threads

Back
Top