Is it Possible that 1 Equals -1: A Mathematical Inquiry?

  • Thread starter Thread starter olek1991
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a claim that 1 equals -1 through a series of mathematical manipulations involving complex numbers and square roots. The original proof attempts to equate 1 and -1 using the properties of imaginary numbers, but participants point out flaws in the reasoning, particularly regarding the principal square root definition. They clarify that the square root function is defined to yield only positive results, which invalidates the argument. The conversation emphasizes the importance of adhering to mathematical definitions and properties, especially when dealing with complex numbers. Ultimately, the assertion that 1 equals -1 is deemed incorrect based on established mathematical principles.
olek1991
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I think that I have proof of 1 being -1 and I can't find any flaw in it.
Could you please take a look?

-1=i² =>
(-1)²=(i²)² =>
1 = i^4 => take the square root both sides
1 = i²

i² = -1 v i² = 1

Thus proving
1 = -1
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
To confuse you a little more can you find the mistake: 2=\sqrt{4}=\sqrt{(-2)^2}=-2.
 
Yea I know those too xD
Does that mean that it is correct? (but just not used since it's crazy)

Edit: the √(-2)² is not -2, but 2 btw :P
You probably meant (-2)² = √4 = 2²
 
Last edited:
No I meant exactly what I wrote, the root cancelling the square. We can't do this because we have defined taking the square root of a real number to be a positive value. This is called the principal square root. For the complex numbers this principal root is defined as \sqrt{z}=\sqrt{|z|}e^{i \pi/2}. In general for complex numbers it is not even true that \sqrt{zw}=\sqrt{z}\sqrt{w}.
 
a^{bc}=\left(a^b\right)^c is not generally true. For example \left(\left(-1\right)^2\right)^{\frac 1 2}\neq-1. You should be careful with this rule when the base is not a positive real number and the exponent is not an integer.
 
Cyosis said:
No I meant exactly what I wrote, the root cancelling the square. We can't do this because we have defined taking the square root of a real number to be a positive value. This is called the principal square root. For the complex numbers this principal root is defined as \sqrt{z}=\sqrt{|z|}e^{i \pi/2}. In general for complex numbers it is not even true that \sqrt{zw}=\sqrt{z}\sqrt{w}.

I really don't get that O.o
Could you dumb it down a little? (I'm a collage student)
 
We can write every complex number z in the form z=|z|e^{i \theta} with |z| the distance between z and the origin and \theta the angle between the x-axis and |z| (polar coordinates). If you have had some complex numbers you should know this representation of a complex number. From this it follows that i=e^{i \pi/2} and i^4=e^{2 \pi i}. Now taking the square root of i^4 we get \sqrt{i^4}=e^{i \pi}=-1.
 
olek1991 said:
Yea I know those too xD
Does that mean that it is correct? (but just not used since it's crazy)

Edit: the √(-2)² is not -2, but 2 btw :P
You probably meant (-2)² = √4 = 2²

No that's not what it means, all of our mathematical foundations would be bogus if we ever said "it's true, but it's too crazy.. so it's pretty much false".
Sqrt(x) is a function (input/output relationships are unique), so given a number (perhaps 9), Sqrt(9) will map to 3.. never -3. If Sqrt(9) could be either -3 OR 3, it wouldn't be a function. Even though (-3)^2 = 9 = (3)^2, the root function is defined to take positive values and produce positive values.


Edit: the √(-2)² is not -2, but 2 btw :P
You probably meant (-2)² = √4 = 2²

This is exactly what you kind of said.. sqrt( (-2)^2 ) is indeed 2 since (-2)^2 gives us 4, and by the definition of the function, we will get the positive possible "root" only.

"You probably meant (-2)² = √4 = 2²" You probably made some typing mistake here.. (-2)^2 = sqrt(4) = 2^2?? 4 = 2 = 4? I don't know
 

Similar threads

Back
Top