What is the Lagrangian for geodesics in Schwarzschild coordinates?

Demon117
Messages
162
Reaction score
1
For pure interest I have been trying to solve for the geodesics of the Schwarzschild metric. To do so I know I need to find the explicit Lagrangian for the variational principle for geodesics in this spacetime in Schwarzschild coordinates. How do I derive this lagrangian?

I know that the proper time along a timelike world line between two points in spacetime is

\sqrt {[-g_{{\alpha \beta }} \left( x \right) {{\it dx}}^{\alpha}{{<br /> \it dx}}^{\beta}]} \left( B-A \right)

But how do I use this and what does it end up telling me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can certainly do it that way, but why not skip a few steps and write down the geodesic equations immediately using Christoffel symbols, as described in any GR textbook.
 
A good explanation of this variational process can be found in Carroll (free online), ch3 I think although not 100% sure. It's not a Lagrangian your after here, it's just that the geodesics are "shortest distance", or as Carroll does maximize proper time...so you want to use Calculus of variations techniques to extrematise the functional you have written. You often get the Christoffel symbols by doing this process too.
 
You can solve the euler lagrange equations for the geodesics as extremal paths using the line element with factors of 1/2 which give you the geodesic equations or you can just find the Christoffel symbols based on its definition in terms of the derivatives of the metric tensor. Its up to you really but the first method is less time consuming for me at least.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top